Literature DB >> 31206498

Fuel Use during Exercise at Altitude in Women with Glucose-Fructose Ingestion.

John P O'Hara1, Lauren Duckworth1, Alistair Black1, David R Woods1,2,3, Adrian Mellor1,2,4, Christopher Boos1,5, Liam Gallagher1, Costas Tsakirides1, Nicola C Arjomandkhah6, Douglas J Morrison7, Thomas Preston7, Roderick F G J King1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the coingestion of glucose and fructose on exogenous and endogenous substrate oxidation during prolonged exercise at terrestrial high altitude (HA) versus sea level, in women.
METHOD: Five women completed two bouts of cycling at the same relative workload (55% Wmax) for 120 min on acute exposure to HA (3375 m) and at sea level (~113 m). In each trial, participants ingested 1.2 g·min of glucose (enriched with C glucose) and 0.6 g·min of fructose (enriched with C fructose) before and every 15 min during exercise. Indirect calorimetry and isotope ratio mass spectrometry were used to calculate fat oxidation, total and exogenous carbohydrate oxidation, plasma glucose oxidation, and endogenous glucose oxidation derived from liver and muscle glycogen.
RESULTS: The rates and absolute contribution of exogenous carbohydrate oxidation was significantly lower at HA compared with sea level (effect size [ES] > 0.99, P < 0.024), with the relative exogenous carbohydrate contribution approaching significance (32.6% ± 6.1% vs 36.0% ± 6.1%, ES = 0.56, P = 0.059) during the second hour of exercise. In comparison, no significant differences were observed between HA and sea level for the relative and absolute contributions of liver glucose (3.2% ± 1.2% vs 3.1% ± 0.8%, ES = 0.09, P = 0.635 and 5.1 ± 1.8 vs 5.4 ± 1.7 g, ES = 0.19, P = 0.217), and muscle glycogen (14.4% ± 12.2% vs 15.8% ± 9.3%, ES = 0.11, P = 0.934 and 23.1 ± 19.0 vs 28.7 ± 17.8 g, ES = 0.30, P = 0.367). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in total fat oxidation between HA and sea level (66.3 ± 21.4 vs 59.6 ± 7.7 g, ES = 0.32, P = 0.557).
CONCLUSIONS: In women, acute exposure to HA reduces the reliance on exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during cycling at the same relative exercise intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31206498     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  5 in total

1.  Normobaric Hypoxia Exposure on Substrate Oxidation Pattern: Sex Differences.

Authors:  M Camacho-Cardenosa; A Gonzalez-Custodio; P Tomas-Carus; R Timon; G Olcina; A Camacho-Cardenosa
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

2.  Response: Commentary on the effects of hypoxia on energy substrate use during exercise.

Authors:  Alex Griffiths; Oliver Shannon; Jamie Matu; Roderick King; Kevin Deighton; John P O'Hara
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Metabolomic profiles are reflective of hypoxia-induced insulin resistance during exercise in healthy young adult males.

Authors:  Lee M Margolis; J Philip Karl; Marques A Wilson; Julie L Coleman; Arny A Ferrando; Andrew J Young; Stefan M Pasiakos
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  The influence of carbohydrate ingestion on peripheral and central fatigue during exercise in hypoxia: A narrative review.

Authors:  Hunter L Paris; Erin C Sinai; Ren-Jay Shei; Alexandra M Keller; Timothy D Mickleborough
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Carbohydrate supplementation and psychophysiological responses during moderate exercise in hypoxia.

Authors:  E Tavares-Silva; F F Donatto; R M V Medeiros; S A Santos; A V Caris; R V Thomatieli-Santos
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.150

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.