Literature DB >> 31206223

Rural-Urban Differences in In-Hospital Mortality Among Admissions for End-Stage Liver Disease in the United States.

Katherine H Ross1, Rachel E Patzer1,2, David Goldberg3, Nicolas H Osborne4, Raymond J Lynch1,2.   

Abstract

Access to quality hospital care is a persistent problem for rural patients. Little is known about disparities between rural and urban populations regarding in-hospital outcomes for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients. We aimed to determine whether rural ESLD patients experienced higher in-hospital mortality than urban patients and whether disparities were attributable to the rurality of the patient or the center. This was a retrospective study of patient admissions in the National Inpatient Sample, a population-based sample of hospitals in the United States. Admissions were included if they were from adult patients who had an ESLD-related admission defined by codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, between January 2012 and December 2014. The primary exposures of interest were patient-level rurality and hospital-level rurality. The main outcome was in-hospital mortality. We stratified our analysis by disease severity score. After accounting for patient- and hospital-level covariates, ESLD admissions to rural hospitals in every category of disease severity had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality than patient admissions to urban hospitals. Those with moderate or major risk of dying had more than twice the odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] for moderate risk, 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-3.59; OR for major risk, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.97-3.14). There was no association between patient-level rurality and mortality in the adjusted models. In conclusion, ESLD patients admitted to rural hospitals had increased odds of in-hospital mortality compared with those admitted to urban hospitals, and the differences were not attributable to patient-level rurality. Our results suggest that interventions to improve outcomes in this population should focus on the level of the health system.
Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31206223     DOI: 10.1002/lt.25587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  4 in total

1.  Rural-Urban Differences in Esophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph G Brungardt; Omar A Almoghrabi; Carolyn B Moore; G John Chen; Alykhan S Nagji
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2021-12-02

2.  Neighborhood poverty is associated with failure to be waitlisted and death during liver transplantation evaluation.

Authors:  Kawthar A Mohamed; Marwan Ghabril; Archita Desai; Eric Orman; Kavish R Patidar; John Holden; Susan Rawl; Naga Chalasani; Chandra Shekhar Kubal; Lauren D Nephew
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 6.112

3.  County Differences in Liver Mortality in the United States: Impact of Sociodemographics, Disease Risk Factors, and Access to Care.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Katherine Ross-Driscoll; Raymond Lynch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Liver Transplantation in the Time of a Pandemic: A Widening of the Racial and Socioeconomic Health Care Gap During COVID-19.

Authors:  Malcolm MacConmara; Benjamin Wang; Madhukar S Patel; Christine S Hwang; Lucia DeGregorio; Jigesh Shah; Steven I Hanish; Dev Desai; Raymond Lynch; Bekir Tanriover; Herbert Zeh; Parsia A Vagefi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 13.787

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.