Truong Manh Dung1, Vo Truong Nhu Ngoc1, Truong Dinh Khoi1, Dinh-Toi Chu1,2, Dao Thi Dung1, Luong Ngoc Khue3, Le Quynh Anh1, Chinh Bkrong Nguyen4, Mohammed Imran Khan5, Amol Ramchandra Gadbail6, Shailesh Madhukar Gondivkar7, Vu Thi Nga8. 1. School of Odonto Stomatology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Viet Nam. 2. Faculty of Biology, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, Viet Nam. 3. Medical Services Administration, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam. 4. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 5. Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Western University, Ontario, Canada. 6. Department of Dentistry, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440018, India. 7. Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Government Dental College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440003, India. 8. Institute for Research and Development, Duy Tan University, 03 Quang Trung, Danang, Viet Nam.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Dental arch dimensions are important not only in dentistry (e.g. orthodontists and prosthodontists, and forensic odontology), but also other medical fields, biology, biometrics, painting or sculpture. This study aimed to determine these dimensions in Vietnamese children and compare these measurements across four ethnic groups and genders. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 3204 Vietnamese children at 7 years of age from four major ethnic groups in Vietnam (Kinh, Tay, Thai and Muong). RESULTS: The means variables in study subjects were 33.72 ± 2.16 mm for upper inter-canine width (UCW); 52.74 ± 2.55 mm for upper inter-molar width (UMW); 8.69 ± 1.79 mm for upper anterior length (UAL); 29.59 ± 1.97 mm for upper posterior length (UPL); 26.94 ± 2.49 mm for lower inter-canine width (LCW); 45.89 ± 2.59 mm for lower inter-molar width (LMW); 5.04 ± 1.53 mm for lower anterior length (LAL); and 26.22 ± 2.07 mm for lower posterior length (LPL). The UCM, UMW, and LMW of Muong were significantly wider in males, but narrower in females compared with other ethnic groups. The Kinh, Tay and Thai groups had no significant differences between genders in all dimensions, but these sizes were significantly larger in males than females of Muong group. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the means of dental arch dimensions in 7 year-old Vietnamese children, and there is no statistical differences in these dimensions between genders of almost studied groups, except Muong group. Ethnic differences are observed only in UCW, UMW and LMW of Muong vs other groups. Furthermore, Vietnamese children have dental arch width similar to the African and Caucasian.
PURPOSE: Dental arch dimensions are important not only in dentistry (e.g. orthodontists and prosthodontists, and forensic odontology), but also other medical fields, biology, biometrics, painting or sculpture. This study aimed to determine these dimensions in Vietnamese children and compare these measurements across four ethnic groups and genders. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 3204 Vietnamese children at 7 years of age from four major ethnic groups in Vietnam (Kinh, Tay, Thai and Muong). RESULTS: The means variables in study subjects were 33.72 ± 2.16 mm for upper inter-canine width (UCW); 52.74 ± 2.55 mm for upper inter-molar width (UMW); 8.69 ± 1.79 mm for upper anterior length (UAL); 29.59 ± 1.97 mm for upper posterior length (UPL); 26.94 ± 2.49 mm for lower inter-canine width (LCW); 45.89 ± 2.59 mm for lower inter-molar width (LMW); 5.04 ± 1.53 mm for lower anterior length (LAL); and 26.22 ± 2.07 mm for lower posterior length (LPL). The UCM, UMW, and LMW of Muong were significantly wider in males, but narrower in females compared with other ethnic groups. The Kinh, Tay and Thai groups had no significant differences between genders in all dimensions, but these sizes were significantly larger in males than females of Muong group. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the means of dental arch dimensions in 7 year-old Vietnamese children, and there is no statistical differences in these dimensions between genders of almost studied groups, except Muong group. Ethnic differences are observed only in UCW, UMW and LMW of Muong vs other groups. Furthermore, Vietnamese children have dental arch width similar to the African and Caucasian.