OBJECTIVE: To review inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval practice at our institution, the Royal London Hospital, and measure changes following a quality improvement intervention. IVC filters are a preventive treatment for pulmonary embolism when anticoagulation is ineffective/contraindicated. Unless permanent filtration is required, all filters should undergo attempted retrieval within manufacturer's recommendations with a success rate of ≥80 %. METHODS: Retrospective audit of filters inserted between 2011 and 2014, followed by a quality improvement intervention and a second audit between 2015 and 2017. Clinical-radiological data were analysed using the Picture Archiving and Communication System and electronic patient records. RESULTS: During the first audit, filter retrieval was attempted in 92% of cases, of which 82% underwent the procedure within manufacturer's recommendations and 86% were successful. During the second audit, an improvement across indicators was seen. Retrieval increased by 3% and was attempted in 95% of cases (92% of which were within manufacturer's guidelines). Rate of retrievals within manufacturer's guidelines increased by 10%. Filter retrieval success rate increased by 11% - to 97%. CONCLUSIONS: IVC filter retrieval practice at a single institution can be improved by implementing a simple audit intervention. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Filter retrieval practice has clinical and medicolegal implications. A simple quality intervention can substantially improve overall practice.
OBJECTIVE: To review inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval practice at our institution, the Royal London Hospital, and measure changes following a quality improvement intervention. IVC filters are a preventive treatment for pulmonary embolism when anticoagulation is ineffective/contraindicated. Unless permanent filtration is required, all filters should undergo attempted retrieval within manufacturer's recommendations with a success rate of ≥80 %. METHODS: Retrospective audit of filters inserted between 2011 and 2014, followed by a quality improvement intervention and a second audit between 2015 and 2017. Clinical-radiological data were analysed using the Picture Archiving and Communication System and electronic patient records. RESULTS: During the first audit, filter retrieval was attempted in 92% of cases, of which 82% underwent the procedure within manufacturer's recommendations and 86% were successful. During the second audit, an improvement across indicators was seen. Retrieval increased by 3% and was attempted in 95% of cases (92% of which were within manufacturer's guidelines). Rate of retrievals within manufacturer's guidelines increased by 10%. Filter retrieval success rate increased by 11% - to 97%. CONCLUSIONS: IVC filter retrieval practice at a single institution can be improved by implementing a simple audit intervention. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Filter retrieval practice has clinical and medicolegal implications. A simple quality intervention can substantially improve overall practice.
Authors: Luis F Angel; Victor Tapson; Richard E Galgon; Marcos I Restrepo; John Kaufman Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Chinmaya Shelgikar; Jahan Mohebali; Mark R Sarfati; Michelle T Mueller; Daniel V Kinikini; Larry W Kraiss Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: C J Hammond; D R Bakshi; R J Currie; J V Patel; D Kinsella; R G McWilliams; A Watkinson; A A Nicholson Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Patrick D Sutphin; Stephen P Reis; Angie McKune; Maria Ravanzo; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Anil K Pillai Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Joel S Marquess; Charles T Burke; Ashley H Beecham; Robert G Dixon; Joseph M Stavas; Alan A Sag; Gary G Koch; Matthew A Mauro Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2008-07-21 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Raman Uberoi; Charles Ross Tapping; Nicholas Chalmers; Victoria Allgar Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Salah D Qanadli; Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari; Laurence Crivelli; Francesco Doenz; Anne-Marie Jouannic; David C Rotzinger Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 4.379