Purpose/ Objectives:Family caregivers of individuals living with cancer are often highly involved in communication with healthcare teams, yet little is known about their experiences, needs, and preferences in this role. To address this gap in the knowledge base, researchers sought to explore family caregivers' perspectives on communication with oncology care providers. Design and Methods: Researchers conducted a secondary inductive thematic analysis of qualitative interviews originally collected as part of a randomized clinical trial of a supportive intervention for family caregivers of patients with cancer (N = 63). Participants: Participants were family caregivers of adult patients with cancer. Most were patients' spouses/long-term partners (52.3%) or adult children/grandchildren (29.2%). Caregivers of patients with all cancer types and stages of disease progression were eligible for study enrollment. Findings: Caregivers valued communication with healthcare providers who were attentive, genuine, broadly focused on patients and caregivers' experiences, sensitive to unmet information needs, and responsive to the potentially different communication preferences of patients and caregivers. Interpretation: Family caregivers expressed a strong preference for person-centered communication, conceptualized as communication that helps healthcare providers meet the needs of patients and caregivers both as individuals and as an interdependent unit of care, and that acknowledges individuals' experiences beyond their prescribed roles of "cancer patient" and "caregiver." Implications for Psychosocial Oncology Practice: Psychosocial oncology providers' strong orientation to the biopsychosocial and spiritual aspects of cancer care delivery make them uniquely positioned to support family caregivers. Findings suggest that providers should explicitly communicate their commitment to both patient and family care, involve family caregivers in psychosocial assessment activities and subsequent intervention, and strive to honor patients and caregivers' potentially different communication preferences.
RCT Entities:
Purpose/ Objectives: Family caregivers of individuals living with cancer are often highly involved in communication with healthcare teams, yet little is known about their experiences, needs, and preferences in this role. To address this gap in the knowledge base, researchers sought to explore family caregivers' perspectives on communication with oncology care providers. Design and Methods: Researchers conducted a secondary inductive thematic analysis of qualitative interviews originally collected as part of a randomized clinical trial of a supportive intervention for family caregivers of patients with cancer (N = 63). Participants: Participants were family caregivers of adult patients with cancer. Most were patients' spouses/long-term partners (52.3%) or adult children/grandchildren (29.2%). Caregivers of patients with all cancer types and stages of disease progression were eligible for study enrollment. Findings: Caregivers valued communication with healthcare providers who were attentive, genuine, broadly focused on patients and caregivers' experiences, sensitive to unmet information needs, and responsive to the potentially different communication preferences of patients and caregivers. Interpretation: Family caregivers expressed a strong preference for person-centered communication, conceptualized as communication that helps healthcare providers meet the needs of patients and caregivers both as individuals and as an interdependent unit of care, and that acknowledges individuals' experiences beyond their prescribed roles of "cancerpatient" and "caregiver." Implications for Psychosocial Oncology Practice: Psychosocial oncology providers' strong orientation to the biopsychosocial and spiritual aspects of cancer care delivery make them uniquely positioned to support family caregivers. Findings suggest that providers should explicitly communicate their commitment to both patient and family care, involve family caregivers in psychosocial assessment activities and subsequent intervention, and strive to honor patients and caregivers' potentially different communication preferences.
Entities:
Keywords:
caregiver; communication; family; oncology; qualitative research
Authors: Susan Eggly; Louis A Penner; Meredith Greene; Felicity W K Harper; John C Ruckdeschel; Terrance L Albrecht Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2006-09-07 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Emily Cherlin; Terri Fried; Holly G Prigerson; Dena Schulman-Green; Rosemary Johnson-Hurzeler; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Sally Thorne; T Gregory Hislop; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Valerie Oglov; John L Oliffe; Kelli I Stajduhar Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ravishankar Jayadevappa; J Sanford Schwartz; Sumedha Chhatre; Alan J Wein; S Bruce Malkowicz Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Karla T Washington; George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; David L Albright; Kevin W Craig; Paul Tatum Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Augusta Silveira; Teresa Sequeira; Joaquim Gonçalves; Pedro Lopes Ferreira Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2022-05-21 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Beatrice Riccò; Claudia Fiorani; Leonardo Ferrara; Leonardo Potenza; Alessia Saviola; Norma Malavasi; Gloria Acquaviva; Chiara Carboni; Laura Scarabelli; Massimo Dominici; Mario Luppi; Giuseppe Longo Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 3.603