Literature DB >> 31203759

Ecological pressures and the contrasting scaling of metabolism and body shape in coexisting taxa: cephalopods versus teleost fish.

Hanrong Tan1, Andrew G Hirst2, Douglas S Glazier3, David Atkinson4.   

Abstract

Metabolic rates are fundamental to many biological processes, and commonly scale with body size with an exponent ( bR) between 2/3 and 1 for reasons still debated. According to the 'metabolic-level boundaries hypothesis', bR depends on the metabolic level ( LR). We test this prediction and show that across cephalopod species intraspecific bR correlates positively with not only LR but also the scaling of body surface area with body mass. Cephalopod species with high LR maintain near constant mass-specific metabolic rates, growth and probably inner-mantle surface area for exchange of respiratory gases or wastes throughout their lives. By contrast, teleost fish show a negative correlation between bR and LR. We hypothesize that this striking taxonomic difference arises because both resource supply and demand scale differently in fish and cephalopods, as a result of contrasting mortality and energetic pressures, likely related to different locomotion costs and predation pressure. Cephalopods with high LR exhibit relatively steep scaling of growth, locomotion, and resource-exchange surface area, made possible by body-shape shifting. We suggest that differences in lifestyle, growth and body shape with changing water depth may be useful for predicting contrasting metabolic scaling for coexisting animals of similar sizes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Physiological diversity, biodiversity patterns and global climate change: testing key hypotheses involving temperature and oxygen'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body shape; body size; energetics; metabolic scaling; respiration

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31203759      PMCID: PMC6606467          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  22 in total

1.  Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth.

Authors:  L VON BERTALANFFY
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Shifts in metabolic scaling, production, and efficiency across major evolutionary transitions of life.

Authors:  John P DeLong; Jordan G Okie; Melanie E Moses; Richard M Sibly; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Metabolic ecology.

Authors:  Murray M Humphries; Kevin S McCann
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 4.  A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants.

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2009-11-06

5.  Shape shifting predicts ontogenetic changes in metabolic scaling in diverse aquatic invertebrates.

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier; Andrew G Hirst; David Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Body shape shifting during growth permits tests that distinguish between competing geometric theories of metabolic scaling.

Authors:  Andrew G Hirst; Douglas S Glazier; David Atkinson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 7.  Relationship between growth and standard metabolic rate: measurement artefacts and implications for habitat use and life-history adaptation in salmonids.

Authors:  Jordan Rosenfeld; Travis Van Leeuwen; Jeffrey Richards; David Allen
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Resource Supply and Demand Both Affect Metabolic Scaling: A Response to Harrison.

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  The influence of the cost of growth on ectotherm metabolism.

Authors:  G D Parry
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1983-04-07       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Ecophysiological influence on scaling of aerobic and anaerobic metabolism of pelagic gonatid squids.

Authors:  Rui Rosa; Lloyd Trueblood; Brad A Seibel
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.247

View more
  5 in total

1.  Physiological diversity, biodiversity patterns and global climate change: testing key hypotheses involving temperature and oxygen.

Authors:  John I Spicer; Simon A Morley; Francisco Bozinovic
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Activity alters how temperature influences intraspecific metabolic scaling: testing the metabolic-level boundaries hypothesis.

Authors:  Douglas Stewart Glazier
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Linking species traits and demography to explain complex temperature responses across levels of organization.

Authors:  Daniel J Wieczynski; Pranav Singla; Adrian Doan; Alexandra Singleton; Ze-Yi Han; Samantha Votzke; Andrea Yammine; Jean P Gibert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  High resolution respirometry of isolated mitochondria from adult Octopus maya (Class: Cephalopoda) systemic heart.

Authors:  Ana Karen Meza-Buendia; Omar Emiliano Aparicio-Trejo; Fernando Díaz; Claudia Caamal-Monsreal; José Pedraza-Chaverri; Carolina Álvarez-Delgado; Kurt Paschke; Carlos Rosas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  How Metabolic Rate Relates to Cell Size.

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.