Literature DB >> 31203738

Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes After Aortic Valve Repair Surgery.

Eilon Ram1, Boris Orlov1, Ami Shinfeld1, Alexander Kogan1, Leonid Sternik1, Ehud Raanani1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess early and late clinical outcomes in patients who underwent aortic valve repair surgery for aortic valve insufficiency, and to investigate predictors for recurrence.
METHODS: Of 151 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve repair surgery for varying degrees of aortic insufficiency (AI) in our department between 2004 and 2018, 60 (40%) underwent aortic root replacement, 71 (47%) aortic cusp plication, 31 (20%) subcommissural annuloplasty, 29 (19%) circular annuloplasty, and 28 (18%) autologous pericardial patch augmentation.
RESULTS: One patient died in the hospital (0.7%). Mean clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 62±43 months (range 1 to 159) and 50 ± 40 months (range 1 to 158), respectively. The overall survival rate was 99.3% at 1 year and 98% at 5 years of follow-up. Seventeen patients (11.3%) had recurrent severe AI, and all of them underwent reoperation with a mean duration to reoperation of 35 ± 39 months. Risk factors for the development of recurrent significant AI (≥3) or reoperation, by univariable analysis, were unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve (AV) (P = 0.018), the use of subcommissural annuloplasty (P = 0.010), the need for cusp repair (P = 0.001), and the use of pericardial patch augmentation (P < 0.001). By multivariable analysis only the use of pericardial patch augmentation emerged as a significant independent predictor for the development of recurrent significant AI (≥3) or reoperation (P = 0.020).
CONCLUSION: AV repair can be performed with low morbidity and mortality, with good early and late clinical outcomes. However, in our experience there was a significant rate of recurrent AI especially in patients who underwent cusp augmentation using glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic cusp repair; aortic valve sparing surgery; pericardial patch augmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31203738     DOI: 10.1177/1556984519845657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innovations (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-9845


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Radosław Gocoł; Jarosław Bis; Marcin Malinowski; Joanna Ciosek; Damian Hudziak; Łukasz Morkisz; Marek Jasiński; Marek A Deja
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.191

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.