Kenneth S Kendler1, Henrik Ohlsson2, Jan Sundquist3, Kristina Sundquist4. 1. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond VA, USA. Electronic address: Kenneth.Kendler@vcuhealth.org. 2. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. Electronic address: Henrik.Ohlsson@med.lu.se. 3. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA; Center for Community-based Healthcare Research and Education (CoHRE), Department of Functional Pathology, School of Medicine, Shimane University, Japan. Electronic address: Jan.Sundquist@med.lu.se. 4. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA; Center for Community-based Healthcare Research and Education (CoHRE), Department of Functional Pathology, School of Medicine, Shimane University, Japan. Electronic address: Kristina.Sundquist@med.lu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Can we validate a contagion model for drug abuse (DA) in Propinquity-of-Rearing Defined Acquaintances (PRDAs)? METHODS: PRDAs were defined as pairs of same-age males born 1975-1990 who grew up within 2 km of each other, one of whom (PRDA1) being first registered for DA in national registries. Using adult residential location, we predicted, using regression splines, proximity-dependent risk for DA first registration in a second PRDA (PRDA2) within 3 years of PRDA1's registration. RESULTS: In 181,743 PRDA pairs, the best-fit model, controlling for age and PRDA2 community risk, included 2 slopes of proximity-risk relationships in childhood and three in adulthood. Risk for DA in PRDA2 was strongly predicted by childhood proximity to PRDA1: 0 to 0.5 km - Hazard ratio (HR) per kilometer 0.52 and 0.6-2 km 0.78. HRs for PRDA2 as a function of adult proximity to PRDA1 were: 0-1 km 0.887, 1-75 km 0.996 and >75 km 0.9997. Proximity-dependent PRDA2 risk was moderated by age, familial risk and educational attainment, attenuated by increasing PRDA1-PRDA2 age differences and stronger for older to younger versus younger to older pairs. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of DA risk between acquaintances growing up together was attenuated by increasing distance in adulthood. Strength of the acquaintance, indexed by childhood propinquity and age difference, modified transmission strength. The impact of adult proximity on transmission was reduced in acquaintances with higher resistance to DA due to older age, higher educational attainment or lower familial risk. Our results support the validity of DA contagion models.
BACKGROUND: Can we validate a contagion model for drug abuse (DA) in Propinquity-of-Rearing Defined Acquaintances (PRDAs)? METHODS: PRDAs were defined as pairs of same-age males born 1975-1990 who grew up within 2 km of each other, one of whom (PRDA1) being first registered for DA in national registries. Using adult residential location, we predicted, using regression splines, proximity-dependent risk for DA first registration in a second PRDA (PRDA2) within 3 years of PRDA1's registration. RESULTS: In 181,743 PRDA pairs, the best-fit model, controlling for age and PRDA2 community risk, included 2 slopes of proximity-risk relationships in childhood and three in adulthood. Risk for DA in PRDA2 was strongly predicted by childhood proximity to PRDA1: 0 to 0.5 km - Hazard ratio (HR) per kilometer 0.52 and 0.6-2 km 0.78. HRs for PRDA2 as a function of adult proximity to PRDA1 were: 0-1 km 0.887, 1-75 km 0.996 and >75 km 0.9997. Proximity-dependent PRDA2 risk was moderated by age, familial risk and educational attainment, attenuated by increasing PRDA1-PRDA2 age differences and stronger for older to younger versus younger to older pairs. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of DA risk between acquaintances growing up together was attenuated by increasing distance in adulthood. Strength of the acquaintance, indexed by childhood propinquity and age difference, modified transmission strength. The impact of adult proximity on transmission was reduced in acquaintances with higher resistance to DA due to older age, higher educational attainment or lower familial risk. Our results support the validity of DA contagion models.
Authors: Catalina Lopez-Quintero; José Pérez de los Cobos; Deborah S Hasin; Mayumi Okuda; Shuai Wang; Bridget F Grant; Carlos Blanco Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kenneth S Kendler; Sara Larsson Lönn; Hermine H Maes; Paul Lichtenstein; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 2.805