Literature DB >> 31202572

Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Dong Woo Shin1, Jong-Chan Lee1, Jaihwan Kim1, Sang Myung Woo2, Woo Jin Lee2, Sung-Sik Han2, Sang-Jae Park2, Kui Son Choi3, Hyo Soung Cha3, Yoo-Seok Yoon4, Ho-Seong Han4, Eun Kyung Hong2, Jin-Hyeok Hwang5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) contains several significant changes. This study aimed to validate the AJCC 8th edition staging system of PDA.
METHODS: We analyzed patients with resected PDA between 2001 and 2017 using the Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) registry. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared via the log-rank test.
RESULTS: In total, 701 resected PDA patients were identified. During a median follow-up of 24.5 months, the median OS was 21.7 months. Meanwhile, the median OS of each stage according to the AJCC 8th edition was 73.5 months (stage IA), 41.9 months (stage IB), 24.2 months (stage IIA), 18.3 months (stage IIB), and 16.8 months (stage III). However, the new N-category (pN1 vs. pN2) did not subdivide prognosis, although the lymph node ratio (i.e., the ratio of the number of LN involved to the number of examined LN) did. Although pT3 and pN2 belong under stage III, pN2 has a significantly longer median OS than pT3 (16.9 months vs 11.2 months; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The AJCC 8th edition staging system appropriately stratifies the prognosis of PDA patients. However, the cutoff of the N-category is not statistically valid, and the new stage III includes a heterogeneous category (pN2 and pT4). Therefore, we propose that stage III be divided into stage IIIA (Tany N2 M0) and stage IIIB (T4 Nany M0).
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American joint committee on cancer; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Staging; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31202572     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  10 in total

1.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is it better than the 7th edition?

Authors:  Dong Woo Shin; Jaihwan Kim
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Tumour Size and T-Stage in Pancreatic Cancer Resection Specimens Depend on the Pathology Examination Approach.

Authors:  My Linh Tran; Maia Blomhoff Holm; Caroline Sophie Verbeke
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Multi-Phase, Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography-Based Radiomic Prognostic Marker of Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Woo Shin; Jaewon Park; Jong-Chan Lee; Jaihwan Kim; Young Hoon Kim; Jin-Hyeok Hwang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Contrast-enhanced CT radiomics for predicting lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ke Li; Qiandong Yao; Jingjing Xiao; Meng Li; Jiali Yang; Wenjing Hou; Mingshan Du; Kang Chen; Yuan Qu; Lian Li; Jing Li; Xianqi Wang; Haoran Luo; Jia Yang; Zhuoli Zhang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Radiomics-Assisted Presurgical Prediction for Surgical Portal Vein-Superior Mesenteric Vein Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fangming Chen; Yongping Zhou; Xiumin Qi; Rui Zhang; Xin Gao; Wei Xia; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Construction and Validation of Novel Nomograms for Predicting Prognosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Surgery According to Different Primary Cancer Locations.

Authors:  Ge Li; Cheng-Yu Liao; Jiang-Zhi Chen; Long Huang; Can Yang; Yi-Feng Tian; Yi-Ting Wang; Qiang Du; Qian Zhan; Yan-Ling Chen; Shi Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Validation and modification of the AJCC 8th TNM staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a Chinese cohort: A nationwide pancreas data center analysis.

Authors:  Hao Hu; Chang Qu; Bingjun Tang; Weikang Liu; Yongsu Ma; Yiran Chen; Xuehai Xie; Yan Zhuang; Hongqiao Gao; Xiaodong Tian; Yinmo Yang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  SLC1A5 Prefers to Play as an Accomplice Rather Than an Opponent in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fangshi Xu; Hai Wang; Honghong Pei; Zhengliang Zhang; Liangliang Liu; Long Tang; Shuang Wang; Bin-Cheng Ren
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-28

9.  Nationwide Validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System and Five Proposed Modifications for Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Thijs J Schouten; Lois A Daamen; Galina Dorland; Stijn R van Roessel; Vincent P Groot; Marc G Besselink; Bert A Bonsing; Koop Bosscha; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Olivier R Busch; Ronald M van Dam; Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta; Sebastiaan Festen; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Erwin van der Harst; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Martijn Intven; Geert Kazemier; Vincent E de Meijer; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; G Mihaela Raicu; Daphne Roos; Jennifer M J Schreinemakers; Martijn W J Stommel; M F van Velthuysen; Robert C Verdonk; Joanne Verheij; Helena M Verkooijen; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; I Quintus Molenaar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.339

10.  Evaluation of the 8th Edition AJCC Staging System for the Clinical Staging of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Huapyong Kang; Seung-Seob Kim; Min Je Sung; Jung Hyun Jo; Hee Seung Lee; Moon Jae Chung; Jeong Youp Park; Seung Woo Park; Si Young Song; Mi-Suk Park; Seungmin Bang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.575

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.