Frederik T Pitter1, Martin Lindberg-Larsen2, Alma B Pedersen3, Benny Dahl4, Martin Gehrchen5. 1. Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9-2100, København Ø, Denmark. Electronic address: Frederik.taylor.pitter@regionh.dk. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløvsvej 4-5000, Odense C, Denmark. 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45-8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital & Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 5. Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9-2100, København Ø, Denmark.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To report the two-year revision risk following primary adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, describe reasons for revisions, and assess risk factors for revision surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Revision risk following primary ASD surgery has been reported to vary between 7% and 26%, but with loss to follow-up as a considerable challenge. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing primary instrumented surgery for ASD in Denmark during 2006-2014 were identified by procedure and diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Complete two-year follow-up on revision surgery for each patient was achieved. Medical records were reviewed to determine reasons for revisions. Overall comorbidity was summarized using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) based on DNPR data; low comorbidity (CCI 0); medium comorbidity (CCI 1-2); and high comorbidity (CCI ≥3). Risk factors for revision were assessed in a Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 553 patients were identified. Of these, 19.9% were revised within the two-year follow-up and 7.2% of patients were revised more than once. Median time to revision was 308 days (interquartile range 105-508). The most common reason for revision was implant failure (38.2%) followed by infection (11.8%). Increased age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.26, per 10 years increment) and high comorbidity burden (HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.16-3.79) were associated with increased revision risk. Risk of revision increased from 2006 to 2014; hence, year of primary surgery (with 2006 as reference) was associated with increased revision risk (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: The revision risk within 2 years after primary ASD surgery was 19.9% nationwide in Denmark, and implant failure was the most common reason for revision. Increased comorbidity and age were separately associated with increased risk of revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To report the two-year revision risk following primary adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, describe reasons for revisions, and assess risk factors for revision surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Revision risk following primary ASD surgery has been reported to vary between 7% and 26%, but with loss to follow-up as a considerable challenge. METHODS:Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing primary instrumented surgery for ASD in Denmark during 2006-2014 were identified by procedure and diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Complete two-year follow-up on revision surgery for each patient was achieved. Medical records were reviewed to determine reasons for revisions. Overall comorbidity was summarized using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) based on DNPR data; low comorbidity (CCI 0); medium comorbidity (CCI 1-2); and high comorbidity (CCI ≥3). Risk factors for revision were assessed in a Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 553 patients were identified. Of these, 19.9% were revised within the two-year follow-up and 7.2% of patients were revised more than once. Median time to revision was 308 days (interquartile range 105-508). The most common reason for revision was implant failure (38.2%) followed by infection (11.8%). Increased age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.26, per 10 years increment) and high comorbidity burden (HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.16-3.79) were associated with increased revision risk. Risk of revision increased from 2006 to 2014; hence, year of primary surgery (with 2006 as reference) was associated with increased revision risk (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: The revision risk within 2 years after primary ASD surgery was 19.9% nationwide in Denmark, and implant failure was the most common reason for revision. Increased comorbidity and age were separately associated with increased risk of revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.