Literature DB >> 31202043

Public exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in everyday microenvironments: An updated systematic review for Europe.

Hamed Jalilian1, Marloes Eeftens2, Mansour Ziaei3, Martin Röösli2.   

Abstract

Communication technologies are rapidly changing and this may affect public exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). This systematic review of literature aims to update a previous review on public everyday RF-EMF exposure in Europe, which covered publications until 2015. From 144 eligible records identified by means of a systematic search in PubMed, Embase and Web of Knowledge databases, published between May 2015 and 1 July 2018, 26 records met the inclusion criteria. We extracted quantitative data on public exposure in different indoors, outdoors and transport environments. The data was descriptively analyzed with respect to the exposure patterns between different types of environments. Mean RF-EMF exposure in homes, schools and offices were between 0.04 and 0.76 V/m. Mean outdoor exposure values ranged from 0.07 to 1.27 V/m with downlink signals from mobile phone base stations being the most relevant contributor. RF-EMF levels tended to increase with increasing urbanity. Levels in public transport (bus, train and tram) and cars were between 0.14 and 0.69 V/m. The highest levels, up to 1.97 V/m, were measured in public transport stations with downlink as the most relevant contributor. In line with previous studies, RF-EMF exposure levels were highest in the transportation systems followed by outdoor and private indoor environments. This review does not indicate a noticeable increase in everyday RF-EMF exposure since 2012 despite increasing use of wireless communication devices.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Electromagnetic fields; Microenvironment; Public exposure; Radiofrequency; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31202043     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  6 in total

1.  Exposure to radiofrequency radiation increases the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Shih; Anthony Paul O'Brien; Chin-Sheng Hung; Kee-Hsin Chen; Wen-Hsuan Hou; Hsiu-Ting Tsai
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Modelling the Influence of Electromagnetic Field on the User of a Wearable IoT Device Used in a WSN for Monitoring and Reducing Hazards in the Work Environment.

Authors:  Patryk Zradziński; Jolanta Karpowicz; Krzysztof Gryz; Leszek Morzyński; Rafał Młyński; Adam Swidziński; Konrad Godziszewski; Victoria Ramos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on human self-reported symptoms: A protocol for a systematic review of human experimental studies.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch-Capblanch; Ekpereonne Esu; Stefan Dongus; Chioma Moses Oringanje; Hamed Jalilian; John Eyers; Gunnhild Oftedal; Martin Meremikwu; Martin Röösli
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 4.  Three Quarters of a Century of Research on RF Exposure Assessment and Dosimetry-What Have We Learned?

Authors:  Kenneth R Foster; Marvin C Ziskin; Quirino Balzano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on biomarkers of oxidative stress in vivo and in vitro: A protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Bernd Henschenmacher; Annette Bitsch; Tonia de Las Heras Gala; Henry Jay Forman; Athanassios Fragoulis; Pietro Ghezzi; Rupert Kellner; Wolfgang Koch; Jens Kuhne; Dmitrij Sachno; Gernot Schmid; Katya Tsaioun; Jos Verbeek; Robert Wright
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  The effect of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cognitive performance in human experimental studies: A protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Blanka Pophof; Jacob Burns; Heidi Danker-Hopfe; Hans Dorn; Cornelia Egblomassé-Roidl; Torsten Eggert; Kateryna Fuks; Bernd Henschenmacher; Jens Kuhne; Cornelia Sauter; Gernot Schmid
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 9.621

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.