Literature DB >> 31201780

Association Between Performance on an Interdisciplinary Stroke Assessment Battery and Falls in Patients With Acute Stroke in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Megan Eikenberry1, Kathleen J Ganley2, Nan Zhang3, Carolyn L Kinney3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between demographic factors and functional performance measures of patients with acute stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) and falls during the IRF stay and to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of functional outcome measures in identifying fallers.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation facility. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with acute stroke admitted to hospital-based IRF (N=139).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios were used to examine the relationship between fall frequency and functional outcome measures (National Institute of Stroke Scale, neglect [Item #11], Berg Balance Scale, Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement mobility and Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement lower extremity subscales [STREAM-LE], Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Dynamic Gait Index, and Stroke Impact Scale). Receiver operator characteristic analysis with area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each functional outcome measure to distinguish patients who fell vs those who did not fall in the IRF.
RESULTS: A total of 23 patients (16.2%) fell during the IRF hospitalization. Patients who did and did not fall did not differ in terms of age, sex, stroke type, or stroke location. Only the STREAM-LE was associated with falls (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99). Area under the curve was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51-0.82). With a positivity cutoff point of 12, sensitivity and specificity were 73.3% (95% CI, 54.6%-92.2%) and 50.0% (95% CI, 39.9%-59.2%), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 3.4.
CONCLUSIONS: The STREAM-LE score at admission to IRF may identify patients with acute stroke who are more likely to fall during their stay. However, the search for measures with greater diagnostic accuracy should continue.
Copyright © 2019 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accidental falls; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31201780     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  2 in total

1.  Utility of an obstacle-crossing test to classify future fallers and non-fallers at hospital discharge after stroke: A pilot study.

Authors:  Jody A Feld; Adam P Goode; Vicki S Mercer; Prudence Plummer
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.746

2.  Determinants of falls after stroke based on data on 5065 patients from the Swedish Väststroke and Riksstroke Registers.

Authors:  Carina U Persson; Per-Olof Hansson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.