Jesse Elliott1, Sasha van Katwyk2, Bláthnaid McCoy3,4, Tammy Clifford2, Beth K Potter2, Becky Skidmore5, George A Wells2,6, Doug Coyle2. 1. School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. jcrai065@uottawa.ca. 2. School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Division of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Independent Information Specialist, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 6. Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant epilepsy affects about one-third of children with epilepsy and is associated with high costs to the healthcare system, yet the cost effectiveness of most treatments is unclear. Use of cannabis-based products for epilepsy is increasing, and the cost effectiveness of such strategies relative to conventional pharmacologic treatments must be considered. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to identify economic evaluations of cannabis-based treatments for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy. We also sought to identify and appraise decision models that have been used in economic evaluations of pharmacologic treatments (i.e., antiepileptic drugs) in this population. METHODS: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library, as well as a targeted grey literature search, were undertaken (11 June 2018). Model-based full economic evaluations involving cannabis-based treatments or pharmacologic treatments for drug-resistant epilepsy in children were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, and study quality was assessed by use of the Drummond and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklists. Study findings, as well as model characteristics, are narratively summarized. RESULTS: Nine economic evaluations involving children with drug-resistant epilepsy were identified; however, none involved cannabis-based treatments. All studies involved pharmacologic treatments compared with other pharmacologic treatments or non-pharmacologic treatments (i.e., ketogenic diet, epilepsy surgery, vagus nerve stimulation). Few studies have assessed the cost effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments in specific drug-resistant epilepsy syndromes, including Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes. Five included studies involved use of Markov models with a similar structure (i.e., health states based on seizure frequency relative to baseline). There was a wide range of methodological quality, and few studies fully addressed context-specific issues such as weight gain and treatment switching. CONCLUSION: Whether cannabis-based treatments for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy represent good value for money has yet to be investigated. Economic evaluations of such treatments are needed and should address issues of particular importance in pediatric epilepsy, including weight gain over time, switching or discontinuation of treatments, effectiveness of interventions and comparators, and long-term effectiveness beyond the duration of available clinical studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42018099591.
BACKGROUND:Drug-resistant epilepsy affects about one-third of children with epilepsy and is associated with high costs to the healthcare system, yet the cost effectiveness of most treatments is unclear. Use of cannabis-based products for epilepsy is increasing, and the cost effectiveness of such strategies relative to conventional pharmacologic treatments must be considered. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to identify economic evaluations of cannabis-based treatments for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy. We also sought to identify and appraise decision models that have been used in economic evaluations of pharmacologic treatments (i.e., antiepileptic drugs) in this population. METHODS: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library, as well as a targeted grey literature search, were undertaken (11 June 2018). Model-based full economic evaluations involving cannabis-based treatments or pharmacologic treatments for drug-resistant epilepsy in children were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, and study quality was assessed by use of the Drummond and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklists. Study findings, as well as model characteristics, are narratively summarized. RESULTS: Nine economic evaluations involving children with drug-resistant epilepsy were identified; however, none involved cannabis-based treatments. All studies involved pharmacologic treatments compared with other pharmacologic treatments or non-pharmacologic treatments (i.e., ketogenic diet, epilepsy surgery, vagus nerve stimulation). Few studies have assessed the cost effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments in specific drug-resistant epilepsy syndromes, including Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes. Five included studies involved use of Markov models with a similar structure (i.e., health states based on seizure frequency relative to baseline). There was a wide range of methodological quality, and few studies fully addressed context-specific issues such as weight gain and treatment switching. CONCLUSION: Whether cannabis-based treatments for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy represent good value for money has yet to be investigated. Economic evaluations of such treatments are needed and should address issues of particular importance in pediatric epilepsy, including weight gain over time, switching or discontinuation of treatments, effectiveness of interventions and comparators, and long-term effectiveness beyond the duration of available clinical studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42018099591.
Authors: Orrin Devinsky; J Helen Cross; Linda Laux; Eric Marsh; Ian Miller; Rima Nabbout; Ingrid E Scheffer; Elizabeth A Thiele; Stephen Wright Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Orrin Devinsky; Anup D Patel; J Helen Cross; Vicente Villanueva; Elaine C Wirrell; Michael Privitera; Sam M Greenwood; Claire Roberts; Daniel Checketts; Kevan E VanLandingham; Sameer M Zuberi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Janna Riechmann; Adam Strzelczyk; Jens P Reese; Rainer Boor; Ulrich Stephani; Cornelia Langner; Bernd A Neubauer; Bettina Oberman; Heike Philippi; Michael Rochel; Jürgen Seeger; Peter Seipelt; Wolfgang H Oertel; Richard Dodel; Felix Rosenow; Hajo M Hamer Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Paul MacMullin; Nathaniel Hodgson; Ugur Damar; Henry Hing Cheong Lee; Mustafa Q Hameed; Sameer C Dhamne; Damon Hyde; Grace M Conley; Nicholas Morriss; Jianhua Qiu; Rebekah Mannix; Takao K Hensch; Alexander Rotenberg Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 5.357