| Literature DB >> 31200719 |
Alexis L Gale1, Renata M Mammone1, Michael E Dodson1, Renata L Linardi1, Kyla F Ortved2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Joint injury is extremely common in equine athletes and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), a progressive and debilitating disease, is estimated to affect 60% of horses in the USA. The limited potential for intrinsic healing of articular cartilage has prompted intense efforts to identify a cell-based repair strategy to prevent progression of PTOA. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have the potential to become an ideal source for cell-based treatment of cartilage lesions; however, full chondrogenic differentiation remains elusive. Due to the relatively low oxygen tension in articular cartilage, hypoxia has been proposed as a method of increasing MSC chondrogenesis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of hypoxic culture conditions on chondrogenesis in equine synovial membrane-derived MSCs (SM-MSCs) and bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs). MSCs were isolated from synovial membrane and bone marrow collected from 5 horses. Flow cytometric analysis was used to assess cell surface marker expression including CD29, CD44, CD90, CD105, CD45, CD-79α, MHCI and MHCII. MSC pellets were cultured in normoxic (21% O2) or in hypoxic (5% O2) culture conditions for 28 days. Following the culture period, chondrogenesis was assessed by histology, biochemical analyses and gene expression of chondrogenic-related genes including ACAN, COL2b, SOX9, and COL10A1.Entities:
Keywords: Bone marrow; Chondrogenesis; Equine; Hypoxia; Mesenchymal stem cell; Normoxia; Synovial membrane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31200719 PMCID: PMC6567476 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1954-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Characterization of BM-MSCs and SM-MSCs using flow cytometric quantification of cell surface marker expression. a Expression of cell surface markers expected to be positive in MSC populations and b expression of cell surface markers expected to be negative in MSC populations. The white histograms represent isotype controls and black histograms represent respective cell surface marker staining. The mean ± SEM percentage of positive cells is in the corner of each histogram. Each histogram is a representative result of 5 horses
Fig. 2Photomicrographs of BM-MSC and SM-MSC pellets cultured in normoxic (21% O2) and hypoxic (5% O2) conditions for 28 days. Pellets were stained with H&E and toluidine blue (scale bar = 100 μm)
Fig. 3Mean ± SEM a) GAG, b) DNA, and c) GAG:DNA content in BM-MSC and SM-MSC pellets cultured in normoxic (21% O2) and hypoxic (5% O2) conditions for 28 days
Fig. 4Relative expression (mean ± SEM) of chondrogenic-related genes including SOX9, ACAN, COL2b and COL10A1 for BM-MSC and SM-MSC pellets cultured in normoxic (21% O2) and hypoxic (5% O2) conditions for 28 days. Expression is relative to normoxic BM-MSC pellets. 18S was used as a reference gene in all analyses. * p < 0.05
Fig. 5Photomicrographs of control and induced BM-MSCs and SM-MSCs stained with alizarin red (osteogenesis) and Oil Red O (adipogenesis). Osteogenically induced MSCs stained with alizarin red are positive for extracellular calcium consistent with osteogenesis. Adipogenically induced MSCs demonstrated positive Oil Red O staining of lipid droplets consistent with adipogenesis. (Bar = 100 μm)
Antibodies used for flow cytometric analysis of equine cell surface markers
| Antibody | Clone/ Isotype | Host Species | Target Species | Fluorophore | 2o Antibody | Company | Dilution for 1o Antibody |
| CD29 | TMD29/IgG1 | Mouse | Human | APC | Yes Goat anti-mouse IgG | EMD Millipore | 1:100 |
| CD44 | IM7/IgG2b | Rat | Human | FITC | No | Thermo IM7 | 1:80 |
| CD90 | ?/IgM | Mouse | Canine, Equine | RPE | No | WSU Monoclonal Antibody Center | 1:200 |
| CD105 | SN6/IgG1 | Mouse | Human | Alexa 488 | No | Bio Rad | 1:10 |
| CD45RB | ?/IgM | Mouse | Equine | RPE | No | WSU Monoclonal Antibody Center | 1:200 |
| CD79α | HM57/IgG1 | Mouse | Human | Alexa 647 | No | Bio Rad | 1:200 |
| MHCI | cz3/IgG2b | Mouse | Equine | APC | Yes Goat anti-mouse IgG | Gifta | 1:100 |
| MHCII | cz11/IgG1 | Mouse | Equine | APC | Yes Goat anti-mouse IgG | Gifta | 1:200 |
| Isotype Control | Corresponding MAB | Target Species | Fluorophore | Company | Dilution | ||
| IgG1 | To CD29 | Mouse | APC | Abcam | 1:100 | ||
| IgG2b | To CD44 | Rat | Alexa 488 | Abcam | 1:100 | ||
| IgM | To CD90 | Mouse | PE | Abcam | 1:200 | ||
| IgG1 | To CD105 | Mouse | Alexa 488 | Abcam | 1:200 | ||
| IgM | To CD45RB | Mouse | PE | Abcam | 1:200 | ||
| IgG1 | To CD79α | Mouse | Alexa 647 | Abcam | 1:400 | ||
| IgG2b | To MHCI | Mouse | APC | Abcam | 1:100 | ||
| IgG1 | To MHCII | Mouse | APC | Abcam | 1:100 |
aGifts from Dr. Doug Antczak, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Equine primer and probe sequences used for gene expression analyses
| Gene | Primer and probe sequences |
|---|---|
| 18S, 18 small ribonucleic acid | Forward, 5′- GCCGCTAGAGGTGAAATTCT-3′ |
| Reverse, 5′- TCGGAACTACGACGGTATCT −3′ | |
| Probe, 5′- AAGACGGACCAGAGCGAAAGCAT-3′ | |
| Forward, 5′-GAGGAGATGGAGGGTGAGGT −3′ | |
| Reverse, 5′-GATGGTGATGTCCTCCTCGC-3′ | |
| Probe, 5′-TTCACCTGTGTAGCAGATGGCGTC-3’ | |
| Forward, 5’-GCTACACTCAAGTCCCTCAAC-3′ | |
| Reverse, 5′-ATCCAGTAGTCTCCGCTCTT-3′ | |
| Probe, 5′-ACCTGAAACTCTGCCACCCTGAAT-3’ | |
| Forward, 5’-CTGGAGACTGCTGAACGAGA-3′ | |
| Reverse, 5′-GAGATGTGTGTCTGCTCCGT − 3′ | |
| Probe, 5′-AGAAGGACCACCCGGACTACAAGTA-3’ |