| Literature DB >> 31200653 |
Kang Luo1,2, Sun Woo Lim1, Jian Jin1,2, Long Jin1, Hyo Wook Gil3, Dai Sig Im4,5, Hyeon Seok Hwang6, Chul Woo Yang7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cilastatin (CL) is an inhibitor of dehydropeptidase-I, which is safely used in clinical practice to prevent nephrotoxicity of antibiotics. Tacrolimus (TAC) is the most important immunosuppressant in renal transplantation, but it causes considerable nephrotoxicity. We evaluated the protective effects of CL against chronic TAC-induced nephropathy.Entities:
Keywords: Cilastatin; Nephrotoxicity; Tacrolimus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31200653 PMCID: PMC6570925 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1399-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Effect of CL on basic parameters and TAC concentration
| VH | VH + CL75 | VH + CL150 | TAC | TAC + CL75 | TAC + CL150 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| △BW (g) | 79 ± 5 | 77 ± 9 | 83 ± 5 | 59 ± 6# | 48 ± 6# | 48 ± 4# |
| UV (mL/day) | 9 ± 2 | 13 ± 1 | 25 ± 1# | 26 ± 3# | 31 ± 7# | 22 ± 3# |
| WI (mL/day) | 15 ± 3 | 18 ± 3 | 30 ± 3# | 30 ± 3# | 34 ± 7# | 26 ± 3# |
| Scr (mg/dL) | 0.35 ± 0.07 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.05# | 0.49 ± 0.02@ | 0.38 ± 0.05@ |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 14.1 ± 3.1 | 14 ± 1.4 | 14.2 ± 0.7 | 56.2 ± 6.9# | 45.5 ± 1.4@ | 42.9 ± 4.5@ |
| UMA (μg/mg) | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 9.2 ± 1.2# | 7.7 ± 1.3 | 4.8 ± 1.0@ |
| CrCl (mL/min/100 g) | 0.77 ± 0.13 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | 0.81 ± 0.11 | 0.35 ± 0.02# | 0.50 ± 0.03@ | 0.62 ± 0.08@ |
| TAC con.in blood (ng/mL) | _ | _ | _ | 14.1 ± 2.4 | 13.5 ± 2.1 | 13.9 ± 1.9 |
| TAC con.in kidney (pg/mg) | _ | _ | _ | 7.4 ± 1.3 | 6.3 ± 1.1 | 5.1 ± 1.6 |
#P < 0.05 vs. VH
@P < 0.05 vs. TAC
BW body weight, UV urine volume, WI Water intake, Scr serum creatinine, BUN blood urea nitrogen, UMA urine microalbumin, CrCl creatinine clearance, TAC con. tacrolimus concentration, VH vehicle, TAC tacrolimus; CL75 and CL150, 75 and 150 mg/kg of CL values are means ± standard error
Fig. 1Effect of CL on fibrosis during TAC-induced renal injury. a Histological analysis of renal cortex treated with TAC shows striped tubulointerstitial fibrosis, mononuclear cell infiltration, and tubular atrophy. CL treatment significantly reduced these damages as compared with TAC treatment. (b and c) Immunoblot analysis of e-cadherin and transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ-1) in the renal cortex. Note that combined treatment with CL reversed changes of e-cadherin and TGFβ-1 in response to TAC treatment. Magnification, 200×. N = 9 per group. #P < 0.05 vs. VH; @P < 0.05 vs. TAC
Fig. 2Effect of CL on inflammation during TAC-induced renal injury. a and b Immunohistochemistry and quantitative analysis for ED-1 and osteopontin (OPN) in the renal cortex. Note that the number of ED-1-positive cells and the intensity of OPN staining are increased in the TAC group and that this increase is inhibited in the TAC + CL groups. Magnification, 200×. N = 9 per group. #P < 0.05 vs. VH; @P < 0.05 vs. TAC
Fig. 3Effect of CL on oxidative stress during TAC-induced renal injury. a and b Immunohistochemistry for 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and 4-hydroxy-2-hexenal (4-HHE) in tissue sections. Intense nuclear expression of 8-OHdG and 4-HHE is shown in the TAC group, and administration of CL reduced their expression levels. c Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of serum 8-OHdG levels. Serum 8-OHdG was decreased in the CL-cotreated groups as compared to those in the TAC group. d Immunoblot analysis of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) in the renal cortex. Note that combined treatment with CL restored their expression as compared with TAC treatment alone. Magnification, 200×. N = 9 per group. #P < 0.05 vs. VH; @P < 0.05 vs. TAC
Fig. 4Effect of CL on apoptosis during TAC-induced renal injury. a In situ TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay and its analysis in the renal tissue sections. CL cotreatment significantly reduced TUNEL-positive cells as compared to TAC treatment. b Representative images of immunohistochemical staining for the active form of caspase-3 (caspase-3) in kidney tissues. Quantitative analysis of caspase-3 in kidney tissues showed that CL cotreatment significantly reduced active caspase-3 staining as compared to TAC treatment alone. The arrows indicate TUNEL-positive apoptotic bodies. Magnification, 200×. N = 9 per group. #P < 0.05 vs. VH; @P < 0.05 vs. TAC
Fig. 5Effect of CL on proximal tubular cells with TAC treatment. a Viability of HK-2 cells in TAC treatment with or without CL cotreatment. Note that CL cotreatment improved cell viability in TAC-treated cells. b Evaluation of apoptosis using FITC–annexin V staining followed by flow cytometry and graphing showed that the mean percentage of annexin V-positive cells was decreased in the TAC + CL group as compared to the TAC group. #P < 0.05 vs. VH; @P < 0.05 vs. TAC