Literature DB >> 31200263

Impact of the chemical structure on amphiphilic properties of sugar-based surfactants: A literature overview.

Théophile Gaudin1, Huiling Lu2, Guillaume Fayet3, Audrey Berthauld-Drelich4, Patricia Rotureau3, Gwladys Pourceau5, Anne Wadouachi5, Elizabeth Van Hecke4, Alla Nesterenko4, Isabelle Pezron6.   

Abstract

In this review, structure-property trends are systematically analyzed for four amphiphilic properties of sugar-based surfactants: critical micelle concentration (CMC), its associated surface tension (γCMC), efficiency (pC20) and Krafft temperature (TK). First, the impact on amphiphilic properties of the alkyl chain size and the presence of branching and/or unsaturation is investigated. Then, various polar head parameters are explored, such as the degree of polymerization of the sugar unit (mono- or oligosaccharides), the chemical nature of the linker and the sugar configuration. Some systematic comparisons between ethoxylated surfactants and sugar-based surfactants are also carried out. While some structural trends with the impact of alkyl chain length or the polar head size are now well understood, this analysis points out that systematic studies of more specific effects of alkyl chain (e.g. branching, unsaturation, presence of rings, position on the polar head) and polar head (e.g. linker, anomeric configuration, internal stereochemistry, cyclic vs. acyclic sugar residues) were scarcer or not available to date. This work encourages the use of these structural trends in the perspective of developing new bio-based surfactants and their consideration in predictive models. It also highlights the need of further experimental tests to fill remaining gaps notably to explore some specific structural features (such as the introduction of rings in the alkyl chain or the position of the alkyl chain on the polar head) and towards applicative properties (like foaming capacity or wettability).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphiphilic properties; Biorefinery; Renewable materials; Structure-property trends; Sugar-based surfactants

Year:  2019        PMID: 31200263     DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2019.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0001-8686            Impact factor:   12.984


  5 in total

1.  Two-in-One Surfactant Disinfectant Potential of Xylitol Dicaprylate and Dilaurate Esters Synthesized by Talaromyces thermophilus galactolipase for Cleaning Industries.

Authors:  Rabaa Ben Ayed; Maha Bouzid; Raja Zbidi; Mustapha Aouioua; Ali Gargouri; Hafedh Belghith; Inès Belhaj
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.926

Review 2.  CNSL, a Promising Building Blocks for Sustainable Molecular Design of Surfactants: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Audrey Roy; Pauline Fajardie; Bénédicte Lepoittevin; Jérôme Baudoux; Vincent Lapinte; Sylvain Caillol; Benoit Briou
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  Synthetic and Bio-Derived Surfactants Versus Microbial Biosurfactants in the Cosmetic Industry: An Overview.

Authors:  Ana B Moldes; Lorena Rodríguez-López; Myriam Rincón-Fontán; Alejandro López-Prieto; Xanel Vecino; José M Cruz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Hexahydrofarnesyl as an original bio-sourced alkyl chain for the preparation of glycosides surfactants with enhanced physicochemical properties.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemahieu; Julie Aguilhon; Henri Strub; Valérie Molinier; Jesús F Ontiveros; Jean-Marie Aubry
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 5.  5-Hydroxymethylfurfural and Furfural Chemistry Toward Biobased Surfactants.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Yue; Yves Queneau
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 9.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.