| Literature DB >> 31200204 |
Birendra Dhungana1, Hui Peng2, Steven Kutarna2, Gisela Umbuzeiro3, Sujan Shrestha1, Jing Liu1, Paul D Jones4, Bikram Subedi5, John P Giesy4, George P Cobb6.
Abstract
Dust samples were collected from four indoor environments, including childcare facilities, houses, hair salons, and a research facility from the USA and were analyzed for brominated compounds using full scan liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. A total of 240 brominated compounds were detected in these dust samples, and elemental formulas were predicted for 120 more abundant ions. In addition to commonly detected brominated flame retardants (BFRs), nitrogen-containing brominated azo dyes (BADs) were among the most frequently detected and abundant. Specifically, greater abundances of BADs were detected in indoor dusts from daycares and salons compared to houses and the research facility. Using authentic standards, a quantitative method was established for two BADs (DB373: Disperse Blue 373 and DV93: Disperse Violet 93) and 2-bromo-4,6-dinitroaniline, a commonly used precursor in azo dye production, in indoor dust. Generally, greater concentrations of DB373 (≤3850 ng/g) and DV93 (≤1190 ng/g) were observed in indoor dust from daycares highlighting children as a susceptible population to potential health risk from exposure to BADs. These data are important because, to date, targeted analysis of brominated compounds in indoor environments has focused mainly on BFRs and appears to underestimate the total amount of brominated compounds.Entities:
Keywords: Brominated compounds; Flame retardants; High-resolution mass spectrometry; House dust; Mutagenic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31200204 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Pollut ISSN: 0269-7491 Impact factor: 8.071