Literature DB >> 31199227

Invasive paediatric Elizabethkingia meningoseptica infections are best treated with a combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or fluoroquinolone.

J C Chan1,2, C Y Chong1,3,4,5, K C Thoon1,5,4, N W S Tee4,6,7, M Maiwald7,8, J C M Lam1,4,9, R Bhattacharya1,4,9, S Chandran4,3,1,10, C F Yung5,3, N W H Tan4,3,1,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Elizabethkingia meningoseptica is a multi-drug-resistant organism that is associated with high mortality and morbidity in newborn and immunocompromised patients. This study aimed to identify the best antimicrobial therapy for treating this infection.
METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted from 2010 to 2017 in a tertiary paediatric hospital in Singapore. Paediatric patients aged 0 to 18 years old with a positive culture for E. meningoseptica from any sterile site were identified from the hospital laboratory database. The data collected included clinical characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility and treatment, and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Thirteen cases were identified in this study. Combination therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or a fluoroquinolone resulted in a cure rate of 81.8  %. The mortality rate was 15.4  % and neurological morbidity in patients with bacteraemia and meningitis remained high (75 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with combination therapy of piperacillin/tazobactam and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or a fluroquinolone was effective in this study, with low mortality rates being observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elizabethkingia meningoseptica; bacteraemia; children; hospital acquired infection; meningitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31199227      PMCID: PMC7423161          DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


Introduction

is a Gram-negative bacterium that is ubiquitous in soil and water, and also occurs in hospital settings [1]. It generally has low virulence, with a predilection for infecting newborns and immunocompromised hosts. It can also cause nosocomial outbreaks, especially in critical care and neonatal units, and these can be difficult to control [2]. It most commonly presents with meningitis and bacteraemia in neonates, but can also cause pneumonia and gastroenteritis, and, rarely, urinary tract infections, septic arthritis, ventriculitis, cellulitis and subdural haemorrhage in the paediatric population [3]. Endocarditis, abdominal infection, wound infection, sinusitis, epididymitis, dialysis-associated peritonitis and eye infections have also been reported in immunocompromised patients [4]. The reported risk factors for infection include prolonged hospital stay, the presence of comorbidities and the use of central venous catheters [5]. is resistant to many antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat Gram-negative infections, which often leads to ineffective treatment when the usual empirical antibiotics are chosen. The reported mortality rates are high (23–52 %) [6]. This retrospective study reviewed the clinical features of paediatric patients with sterile site infections at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital over an 8-year period. Antimicrobial susceptibilities, treatment regimens and clinical outcomes were also evaluated.

Methods

This was a retrospective 8-year descriptive study conducted between January 2010 and December 2017 at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore. Infants and children who were between 0 and 18 years old and had produced a positive culture for from any sterile site [blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)] were included. Cases were identified from the hospital laboratory database. Patients’ medical records were reviewed and the following information was extracted: age, gender, birth and neonatal history (if relevant), length of hospital stay prior to sterile site infection, highest level of care, clinical diagnosis, immunological status, presence of central venous access and removal (if applicable), antibiotic susceptibility, choice and duration of antibiotic treatment, clinical outcome, microbiological cure (defined as two successive negative blood cultures) and the ward or unit the patient was staying in at the time of laboratory confirmation.

Microbiology

We used the VitekR mass spectrometry system (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight MS (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France) to identify . Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed using the CDS criteria for ‘ sp.’ [7], and where no CDS criteria were available, we supplemented these with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for ‘other non-’ [8] or the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) PK/PD non-species related breakpoints [9]. Cotrimoxazole was tested by disk testing, and the E-test strip (bioMérieux) was used for the other antimicrobials (piperacillin/tazobactam/ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin/moxifloxacin).

Results

Patients’ characteristics

During the 8-year study period, there were 13 patients with from blood (n=13) and CSF (n=4). Table 1 shows the clinical characteristics of these patients. Their ages ranged from 12 days to 9.5 years, with a median age of 2 years. Males constituted 46% of the patients and females constituted 54 % of the patients in this study. All patients were bacteraemic. In addition, four patients (three neonates) were also positive for in CSF and were diagnosed with meningitis.
Table 1.

Clinical characteristics, antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcomes for patients with sterile site infections

Case

Age (years)

Sex

Location

Underlying condition

Date of isolation of blood culture

LOS prior to infection

CVL

Line removal (day of illness)

Meningitis

Antibiotic sensitivity

Empirical treatment

Treatment

Total duration of antibiotic treatment (days)

Time to first negative CS (days)

Neurological morbidity

Death

1

7

F

CICU

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

28 June 2011

4 days

Yes

No

No

TZP/SXT

CAZ/AMK/MNZ

TZP/SXT

14

3

No

No

2

9

F

CICU

Chronic granulocytic leukaemia

4 July 2011

5 months

Yes

Yes (1)

No

TZP, resistant to SXT, CIP

MEM/VAN

TZP/CIP

8 (till demise)

0

na

Yes

3†

8

F

Onco

Refractory acute myeloid leukaemia

21 July 2011

19 days

Yes

Yes (2)

No

TZP/SXT, resistant to CIP

MEM/AMK/VAN

SXT/CIP

21 days

1

na

Yes *

4

0.5

F

NICU

Preterm 33 weeks, necrotizing enterocolitis

3 Mar 2012

6 months

Yes

No

No

TZP/SXT/CIP

MEM/AMK/VAN

TZP/SXT

14

5

Yes. Motor skills delay. Reduced academic performance

No

5

2

M

Onco

Pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

10 Apr 2012

1 day

Yes

Yes (8)

No

TZP/SXT, resistant to CIP

CAZ/GEN

TZP/SXT

14

44**

No

No

6

9.5

M

CICU

Pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

18 Nov 2012

2 months

Yes

No

No

TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX, resistant to CIP

MEM/VAN/CAZ

TZP/SXT

2 (till demise)

0

na

Yes

7

2

M

Ward

Haemophilia A with left subdural haematoma

23 Apr 2013

14 days

No

na

Yes

TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX, resistant to CIP

CRO

SXT/MXF, TZPa

42

2

Yes. Cerebral palsy, severe GDD

No

8

5

M

Ward

Extensive burns

15 June 2013

3 months

Yes

No

No

TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX, resistant to CIP

TZP

TZP/LVX, SXTb

14

9

No

No

9

2

M

Onco

Recurrent grade 4 pineoblastoma

30 June 2014

1 day

Yes

Yes (4)

No

TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX/CIP

TZP

TZP/CIP, SXTc

14

3

na

Yes*

10

20 days

F

NICU

Preterm 23 weeks

30 Sept 2014

20 days

Yes

Yes (14)

No

TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX/CIP

CXA/GEN

TZP/CIP, SXTd

14

8

Yes. Moderate GDD

No

11

13 days

F

NICU

Preterm 33 weeks, necrotizing enterocolitis

13 Apr 15

13 days

Yes

Yes (2)

Yes

TZP/RIF, resistant to SXT, CIP, MXF, LVX, MI

CXA/GEN/MNZ

TZP/RIF

21

9

No

No

12

30 days

F

NICU

Preterm 24 weeks

22 July 2015

30 days

Yes

Yes (2)

Yes

TZP/SXT/LVX/RIF

CXA/AMK

TZP/SXT

21

4

Yes. Moderate GDD

No

13

12 days

M

Ward

Term infant, left pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction

26 Apr 2016

1 day

No

na

Yes

TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX/CIP

AMP/GEN

TZP/SXT

21

6

Yes. Mild developmental delay. Hydrocephalus with VP shunt inserted

No

a, TZP discontinued due to allergic reaction; b, SXT discontinued due to allergic reaction; c, SXT discontinued due to plans for initiation of chemotherapy; d, SXT discontinued due to acute kidney injury.

Patient died due to underlying oncological condition.

Blood cultures were not performed on a regular basis due to palliative care.

Patient 3 had two episodes of bacteraemia. During the first episode, she achieved a microbiological cure with intravenous trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin. Parents requested discharge against medical advice, and she was sent home on oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin to complete 21 days’ total treatment. She was readmitted 1 month later with a more resistant strain of bacteraemia [sensitive to TZP/CC/MI/MXF (intermediate) and resistant to SXT and CIP]. Although she managed to achieve a microbiological cure with a combination of piperacillin/tazobactam, clindamycin, minocycline and moxifloxacin, she succumbed to her underlying oncological condition.

AMK, amikacin; AMP, ampicillin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CC, clindamycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CRO, ceftriaxone; CVL, central venous line; CXA, cloxacillin; GDD, global developmental delay; GEN, gentamicin; LVX, levofloxacin; MEM, meropenem; MI, minocycline; MNZ, metronidazole; MXF, moxifloxacin; na, not applicable; RIF, rifampicin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TZP, piperacillin- tazobactam; VAN, vancomycin; VP, ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

Clinical characteristics, antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcomes for patients with sterile site infections Case Age (years) Sex Location Underlying condition Date of isolation of blood culture LOS prior to infection CVL Line removal (day of illness) Meningitis Antibiotic sensitivity Empirical treatment Treatment Total duration of antibiotic treatment (days) Time to first negative CS (days) Neurological morbidity Death 1 7 F CICU Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia 28 June 2011 4 days Yes No No TZP/SXT CAZ/AMK/MNZ TZP/SXT 14 3 No No 2 9 F CICU Chronic granulocytic leukaemia 4 July 2011 5 months Yes Yes (1) No TZP, resistant to SXT, CIP MEM/VAN TZP/CIP 8 (till demise) 0 na Yes 3† 8 F Onco Refractory acute myeloid leukaemia 21 July 2011 19 days Yes Yes (2) No TZP/SXT, resistant to CIP MEM/AMK/VAN SXT/CIP 21 days 1 na Yes† * 4 0.5 F NICU Preterm 33 weeks, necrotizing enterocolitis 3 Mar 2012 6 months Yes No No TZP/SXT/CIP MEM/AMK/VAN TZP/SXT 14 5 Yes. Motor skills delay. Reduced academic performance No 5 2 M Onco Pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukaemia 10 Apr 2012 1 day Yes Yes (8) No TZP/SXT, resistant to CIP CAZ/GEN TZP/SXT 14 44** No No 6 9.5 M CICU Pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukaemia 18 Nov 2012 2 months Yes No No TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX, resistant to CIP MEM/VAN/CAZ TZP/SXT 2 (till demise) 0 na Yes 7 2 M Ward Haemophilia A with left subdural haematoma 23 Apr 2013 14 days No na Yes TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX, resistant to CIP CRO SXT/MXF, TZP 42 2 Yes. Cerebral palsy, severe GDD No 8 5 M Ward Extensive burns 15 June 2013 3 months Yes No No TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX, resistant to CIP TZP TZP/LVX, SXT 14 9 No No 9 2 M Onco Recurrent grade 4 pineoblastoma 30 June 2014 1 day Yes Yes (4) No TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX/CIP TZP TZP/CIP, SXT 14 3 na Yes* 10 20 days F NICU Preterm 23 weeks 30 Sept 2014 20 days Yes Yes (14) No TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX/CIP CXA/GEN TZP/CIP, SXT 14 8 Yes. Moderate GDD No 11 13 days F NICU Preterm 33 weeks, necrotizing enterocolitis 13 Apr 15 13 days Yes Yes (2) Yes TZP/RIF, resistant to SXT, CIP, MXF, LVX, MI CXA/GEN/MNZ TZP/RIF 21 9 No No 12 30 days F NICU Preterm 24 weeks 22 July 2015 30 days Yes Yes (2) Yes TZP/SXT/LVX/RIF CXA/AMK TZP/SXT 21 4 Yes. Moderate GDD No 13 12 days M Ward Term infant, left pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction 26 Apr 2016 1 day No na Yes TZP/SXT/MXF/LVX/CIP AMP/GEN TZP/SXT 21 6 Yes. Mild developmental delay. Hydrocephalus with VP shunt inserted No a, TZP discontinued due to allergic reaction; b, SXT discontinued due to allergic reaction; c, SXT discontinued due to plans for initiation of chemotherapy; d, SXT discontinued due to acute kidney injury. Patient died due to underlying oncological condition. Blood cultures were not performed on a regular basis due to palliative care. Patient 3 had two episodes of bacteraemia. During the first episode, she achieved a microbiological cure with intravenous trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin. Parents requested discharge against medical advice, and she was sent home on oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin to complete 21 days’ total treatment. She was readmitted 1 month later with a more resistant strain of bacteraemia [sensitive to TZP/CC/MI/MXF (intermediate) and resistant to SXT and CIP]. Although she managed to achieve a microbiological cure with a combination of piperacillin/tazobactam, clindamycin, minocycline and moxifloxacin, she succumbed to her underlying oncological condition. AMK, amikacin; AMP, ampicillin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CC, clindamycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CRO, ceftriaxone; CVL, central venous line; CXA, cloxacillin; GDD, global developmental delay; GEN, gentamicin; LVX, levofloxacin; MEM, meropenem; MI, minocycline; MNZ, metronidazole; MXF, moxifloxacin; na, not applicable; RIF, rifampicin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TZP, piperacillin- tazobactam; VAN, vancomycin; VP, ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Seven patients (53.8 %) were immunocompromised, and of these six (46 %) had underlying malignancies and were being treated with chemotherapy, while one had severe third-degree burns. Four patients (30.7 %) were preterm infants, and two of these were extremely premature at 23 and 24 weeks, respectively. All immunocompromised patients and preterm infants had central venous catheters at the time of detection, and these were removed in 7/11 of the patients (63.6 %). The average length of stay in hospital prior to developing bacteraemia was 45±57.3 days (range 1 to 180 days; median 19 days). Seven patients (53.8 %) acquired bacteraemia in the intensive care unit (ICU), while there were three patients (23 %) each from the oncology and general wards. All cases occurred sporadically, with no outbreaks or clusters of infection.

Antimicrobial susceptibility

All isolates demonstrated 100 % susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam, and variable susceptibility to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (11/14, 78.6 %) and fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin 4/12, 33.3 %; moxifloxacin 7/8, 87.5 %; levofloxacin 7/8, 87.5 %) (Table 1 and footnote). Patient 3 had two episodes of bacteraemia. She was treated with intravenous trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin, and was able to achieve a microbiological cure. However, her parents requested that she be discharged against medical advice and she was sent home on oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin to complete 21 days’ total treatment. She was readmitted 1 month later with a more resistant strain of bacteraemia, which was resistant to both trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin. Although she eventually achieved a microbiological cure with a combination of piperacillin/tazobactam, clindamycin, minocycline and moxifloxacin, she succumbed to her underlying oncological condition.

Therapeutic regimens and outcome

All patients were treated with combination antibiotics. Piperacillin/tazobactam was used in the treatment of all patients, except patient 3 during her first episode of bacteraemia. Piperacillin/tazobactam with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was the most common antibiotic combination (n=6), followed by piperacillin/tazobactam with a fluroquinolone (n=4). The other antimicrobial agents used included minocycline, clindamycin and rifampicin. Patients 7 and 8 developed allergic reactions to piperacillin/tazobactam and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, respectively, and were then changed to a fluoroquinolone. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was converted to ciprofloxacin in patient 9 in preparation for chemotherapy reinitiation to avoid the side effect of neutropaenia, while for patient 10 the switch was made in view of acute renal impairment. A microbiological cure was achieved in 11 out of the 13 patients (84.6 %) in this case study.

Mortality and morbidity

The rate for mortality attributable to bacteraemia was 15.4 % (2/13). Two patients achieved microbiological cure, but died from their underlying diagnosis (case 3 from refractory acute myeloid leukaemia and case 9 from recurrent grade 4 pineoblastoma). All neonates (4/4) in this case study survived. Patients had been on follow-up from 2 to 5 years until the point of this study. Morbidity was high (75 %) amongst patients who presented with meningitis. Three out of four patients with meningitis were assessed to have developmental delay on follow-up. One patient had post-infectious hydrocephalus requiring ventriculo-peritoneal shunt insertion. Patient 7 developed quadriplegic cerebral palsy with severe disability, in addition to severe global developmental delay, although this likely resulted from the left subdural haematoma he sustained. Only one patient had appropriate growth and development when she was last reviewed at 2 years old. Amongst patients who survived bacteraemia without meningitis (n=5), one patient had reduced academic performance, and another had moderate global developmental delay. Both patients were ex-premature infants, which could have contributed to the developmental delay. All patients with underlying malignancies who survived the infection (n=2) had no notable morbidity over a follow-up period of 5 years.

Discussion

The main finding in our study is that combination therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam and trimethoprim/sulfaxazole or fluroquinolone seems to result in high rates of microbiological cure, with relatively low mortality. There has been no consensus on the optimal antimicrobial therapy for . It has unusual antibiotic susceptibility profiles and is resistant to most antibiotics used to treat Gram-negative organisms, such as aminoglycosides, carbapenems and cephalosporins [5]. It has shown shown good susceptibility in vitro to inocycline, quinolones, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, piperacillin/tazobactam and rifampin [1, 6]. Some anecdotal reports encourage the use of combination antibiotic therapy, especially in cases where monotherapy has failed [6]. Huang et al. [10] reported that monotherapy with fluoroquinolones had significantly better outcomes than monotherapy with non-fluoroquinolone antibiotics. In our study, all our patients were treated with combination antibiotics, with piperacillin/tazobactam as the backbone of the treatment. Piperacillin/tazobactam with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was the most common combination used. All strains of in our study were susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam, followed by trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (78.6 %) and fluoroquinolones (33.3–87.5 %). Amongst the fluoroquinolones, the highest sensitivities were observed with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin (87.5 %), while that for ciprofloxacin was only 33.3 %. Case 3 was a patient whose infection initially responded very well to the combination of intravenous trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin, as was evident from the microbiological clearance after just 1 day of therapy. Unfortunately, she did not complete a course of intravenous antibiotics and was discharged on oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin due to her parents’ insistence. She returned to the hospital for bacteraemia again, which was resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethxazole and ciprofloxacin the second time around. This suggests that oral antibiotics are insufficient for the treatment of . We postulate that the incomplete treatment of this infection resulted in the development of antimicrobial resistance, making it harder to treat subsequently. Two patients were reported to have developed allergic reactions to piperacillin/tazobactam and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was also changed to a fluoroquinolone in two other patients: a neonate with acute kidney injury and an oncological patient with planned chemotherapy. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole have been associated with renal toxicity and cause bone marrow suppression, resulting in agranulocytosis, or aplastic anaemia, in previous studies. No other adverse effects from antimicrobial treatment were detected in this study. Previous studies reported high mortality rates (33–52 %) [3, 6], with the highest mortality being observed among neonates [3]. In our study, the rate for mortality directly attributable to was much lower, at 15.4 %. All of the neonates in our study survived. Predictors of mortality include prematurity, immunocompromised state, delay in diagnosis, inappropriate antimicrobial treatment within 72 h of bacteraemia and central venous catheters [1, 6]. Our relatively low mortality rates may be due to early and appropriate combination antimicrobial therapy and newer antibiotic choices. Also, the first-line empirical antibiotic for children with febrile neutropaenia at our centre is piperacillin/tazobactam [11], which is usually effective in the treatment of infection. Morbidity remained high in patients with meningitis; three out of four patients (75%) had hydrocephalus or neurological sequelae. Worldwide, 30 % of surviving children have developed hydrocephalus [3]. Other complications included developmental delays, seizures, deafness and growth retardation [3]. The morbidity from meningitis appears to be much higher than that for patients suffering from any other bacterial meningitis in our institution (23–29 %) [12]. In this study, the paediatric patients at greatest risk of sterile site infections were immunocompromised children with underlying malignancies (46 %), followed by neonates (less than 1 month of age; 30.7 %). Neonates were likely to present with meningitis together with bacteraemia, while older children were only positive for from blood samples. Other risk factors included prolonged hospital stay (mean length of hospitalization 45 days prior to diagnosis), admission to ICU and presence of a central venous catheter. The number of reported cases of infection has steadily increased in recent years, with a worldwide geographical distribution [3]. Outbreaks of disease have been reported [13, 14], although the majority of cases occur sporadically. It is typically a nosocomial infection, and common sources include water supplies or medical equipment. Although previous studies have suggested that neonatal patients account for around three-quarters of the paediatric cases, they accounted for less than one-third of cases in our study, with the largest group being patients with haematological malignancies. Regular environmental surveillance, as well as intensified cleaning of medical equipment, have been effective in reducing outbreaks [6] and may be indicated in wards such as ICUs and oncology wards, where most at-risk patients are cared for. We identified some limitations in our study. It was a retrospective descriptive study, with a small number of patients included, which is a reflection of the relatively low incidence of infections in our population. Further, antibiotic sensitivity testing for was only routinely performed for trimethoprim/sulfaxazole and piperacillin/tazobactam in our institute. The tests for other antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones were performed at the physician’s request, or if antimicrobial resistance to trimethoprim/sulfaxazole and/or piperacillin/tazobactam was detected. Future randomized controlled studies could be performed to identify the most effective combination antibiotic therapy in the treatment of sterile site infections.

Conclusions

is an important cause of nosocomial infections, with high mortality and morbidity. Treatment with combination therapy of piperacillin/tazobactam and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole appeared to be effective in the majority of cases in our study, with comparatively low mortality rates being observed. Newer fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin and moxifloxacin may be considered to be good alternatives, with high rates of sensitivity, and they could be effective for children who are unable to tolerate trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, with fewer adverse events being reported for them in our study. Future studies with randomized controlled trials of various combination therapies could be considered to evaluate efficacy.
  11 in total

1.  A 15-year retrospective analysis of prognostic factors in childhood bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  Liang Yi Justin Wee; Raymond Reinaldo Tanugroho; Koh Cheng Thoon; Chia Yin Chong; Chew Thye Choong; Subramania Krishnamoorthy; Matthias Maiwald; Nancy Wen Sim Tee; Natalie Woon Hui Tan
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 2.  Elizabethkingia meningoseptica: an important emerging pathogen causing healthcare-associated infections.

Authors:  S S Jean; W S Lee; F L Chen; T Y Ou; P R Hsueh
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of fluoroquinolone and non-fluoroquinolone treatment in patients with Elizabethkingia meningoseptica bacteraemia.

Authors:  Ying-Chi Huang; Yi-Tsung Lin; Fu-Der Wang
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Chryseobacterium (Flavobacterium) meningosepticum outbreak associated with colonization of water taps in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  S N Hoque; J Graham; M E Kaufmann; S Tabaqchali
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Causative Pathogens of Febrile Neutropaenia in Children Treated for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.

Authors:  Joyce Cm Lam; Jie Yang Chai; Yi Ling Wong; Natalie Wh Tan; Christina Tt Ha; Mei Yoke Chan; Ah Moy Tan
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.473

6.  Bad design, bad practices, bad bugs: frustrations in controlling an outbreak of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica in intensive care units.

Authors:  M N D Balm; S Salmon; R Jureen; C Teo; R Mahdi; T Seetoh; J T W Teo; R T P Lin; D A Fisher
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and outcomes of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica (Chryseobacterium meningosepticum) bacteremia at a medical center in Taiwan, 1999-2006.

Authors:  M-S Hsu; C-H Liao; Y-T Huang; C-Y Liu; C-J Yang; K-L Kao; P-R Hsueh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  A Chryseobacterium meningosepticum outbreak observed in 3 clusters involving both neonatal and non-neonatal pediatric patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Ceyhan; Inci Yildirim; Alper Tekeli; Murat Yurdakok; Ebru Us; Belgin Altun; Tezer Kutluk; Ali Bülent Cengiz; Venhar Gurbuz; Cagri Barin; Arzu Bagdat; Duygu Cetinkaya; Deniz Gur; Onur Tuncel
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Infections due to Elizabethkingia meningoseptica in critically injured trauma patients: a seven-year study.

Authors:  N Rastogi; P Mathur; A Bindra; K Goyal; N Sokhal; S Kumar; S Sagar; R Aggarwal; K D Soni; V Tandon
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Elizabethkingia meningoseptica: Emerging nosocomial pathogen in bedside hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  M S Ratnamani; Ratna Rao
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparative Genomics and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Elizabethkingia Isolates Reveal Nosocomial Transmission and In Vitro Susceptibility to Fluoroquinolones, Tetracyclines, and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.

Authors:  Delaney Burnard; Letitia Gore; Andrew Henderson; Ama Ranasinghe; Haakon Bergh; Kyra Cottrell; Derek S Sarovich; Erin P Price; David L Paterson; Patrick N A Harris
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Epidemiology and Characteristics of Elizabethkingia spp. Infections in Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Asdren Zajmi; Jeanette Teo; Chew Chieng Yeo
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory features of patients infected with Elizabethkingia meningoseptica at a tertiary hospital in Hefei City, China.

Authors:  Yajuan Li; Tingting Liu; Cuixiao Shi; Bo Wang; Tingting Li; Ying Huang; Yuanhong Xu; Ling Tang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20

4.  Management of large congenital chylous ascites in a preterm infant: fetal and neonatal interventions.

Authors:  Loo Sooklin; Amudha Jayanthi Anand; Victor Samuel Rajadurai; Suresh Chandran
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-02

5.  Molecular Characteristics and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Elizabethkingia Clinical Isolates in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Leilei Wang; Xuefei Zhang; Dan Li; Fupin Hu; Minggui Wang; Qinglan Guo; Fan Yang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.