Literature DB >> 31198462

Evaluation of the Surgical and Pharmacological Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infection: A Retrospective Study.

Adil Hassan Aliakbar1, Malath Azeez Alsaadi2, Abbas Abd Zaid Barrak3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot infection is a major cause of patient disabilities and lowers limb amputations, with high treatment costs and hospitalisation requirements. AIM: Aim of this study was to evaluate surgical wound care plus antibiotic effects in the treatment of mild and moderate diabetic foot infections.
METHODS: This retrospective study involved 60 patients with diabetic foot infections with or without osteomyelitis. The patients were categorised as group 1 mild and group 2 moderate. Both groups were treated using local wound debridement and the systemic administration of antibiotics. Group 1 (16) patients were treated with two regimens of oral antibiotics in two regimens, A (amoxicillin/clavulanate + metronidazole) and B (clindamycin + metronidazole), for 10-14 days. Group 2 (42) patients were treated with oral plus intravenous antibiotics in two regimens, A (ampicillin + cloxacillin + metronidazole) and B (lincomycin + metronidazole), for 6 weeks. The patients followed-up with local wound care specialists for 3 months to evaluate the treatment outcomes (cure, improvement, or failure).
RESULTS: Group 1 had an 80% cure rate under regimen A and a 100% cure rate under regimen B. Group 2 regimen A patients had a 61.5% cure rate and 11.53% improved, while regimen B patients had a 68.75% cure rate and 12.5% improved. Failure in both regimens was 23.8% in 20 patients with osteomyelitis, while 35% were cured and 20% improved during the study period.
CONCLUSION: Local surgical wound care for 3 months with antibiotic regimens for 6 weeks resulted in good response and cure rates, with lower costs and fewer instances of hospitalisation. Intravenous lincomycin and oral metronidazole achieved higher cure responses for moderate diabetic foot infections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotics; Diabetic foot; Infection; Outpatients

Year:  2019        PMID: 31198462      PMCID: PMC6542384          DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci        ISSN: 1857-9655


  20 in total

Review 1.  Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Andrew J M Boulton; Sicco A Bus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Choice of wound care in diabetic foot ulcer: A practical approach.

Authors:  Karakkattu Vijayan Kavitha; Shalbha Tiwari; Vedavati Bharat Purandare; Sudam Khedkar; Shilpa Sameer Bhosale; Ambika Gopalakrishnan Unnikrishnan
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  Current indications for the use of clindamycin: A critical review.

Authors:  M Smieja
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01

4.  Antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot infections: comparison of two parenteral-to-oral regimens.

Authors:  B A Lipsky; P D Baker; G C Landon; R Fernau
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lipsky; Anthony R Berendt; Paul B Cornia; James C Pile; Edgar J G Peters; David G Armstrong; H Gunner Deery; John M Embil; Warren S Joseph; Adolf W Karchmer; Michael S Pinzur; Eric Senneville
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Health Care Service and Outcomes Among an Estimated 6.7 Million Ambulatory Care Diabetic Foot Cases in the U.S.

Authors:  Grant H Skrepnek; Joseph L Mills; Lawrence A Lavery; David G Armstrong
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin for severe diabetic foot infections: a prospective, randomized clinical trial in a university hospital.

Authors:  N Saltoglu; A Dalkiran; T Tetiker; H Bayram; Y Tasova; C Dalay; M Sert
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  A randomized, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with vancomycin plus ceftazidime for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections.

Authors:  Gary J Noel; Karen Bush; Partha Bagchi; Juliana Ianus; Richard S Strauss
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 9.  Diabetic foot infection.

Authors:  Mazen S Bader
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.292

10.  Diabetic foot infections: current concept review.

Authors:  Kimberlee B Hobizal; Dane K Wukich
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2012-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.