Literature DB >> 31198093

"I want to know what it is used for": Clients' perspectives on completing a routine outcome measure (ROM) while undergoing psychotherapy.

Sara Börjesson1, Petra K Boström2.   

Abstract

Objectives: Within mental health care, the use of routine outcome measure (ROMs) has increased. So far, clients' perspectives on ROMs in the context of long-term psychotherapy remain largely unexplored. The present study aimed to explore clients' perspectives on completing the CORE-OM throughout psychotherapy. Method: Eight clients attending a psychiatric outpatient clinic in Sweden were interviewed and the data were analyzed according to the principles of interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Results: The results included three main themes. The clients described an uncertainty of the purpose and usage of the CORE-OM, which gave room for interpretations regarding possible consequences of the results. The theme self-reporting in a relational context describes the clients' reflections about the CORE-OM, both as a measure and as a means for communication requiring continuous feedback. The CORE-OM as part of the treatment indicated that completing the questionnaire was useful for clients by evoking feelings and increasing awareness of inner states. Conclusions: ROMs should be used with great care in the treatment process and openness about the purpose of the instrument might increase the validity of the results. The use of ROMs as both an outcome measure on group level and a therapeutic tool is discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CORE; client perspective; interpretative phenomenological analysis; long term psychotherapy; mental health services research; outcome research; routine outcome measure; routine outcome monitoring

Year:  2019        PMID: 31198093     DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1630780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Res        ISSN: 1050-3307


  5 in total

1.  A novel patient-reported outcome monitoring with clinical feedback system in bariatric surgery care: study protocol, design and plan for evaluation.

Authors:  Pål André Hegland; Anny Aasprang; Ronette L Kolotkin; Christian Moltu; Grethe S Tell; John Roger Andersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Feasibility and Efficacy of a Psychological Therapy for Patients With a Schizophrenic Psychosis in an Inpatient Setting: Study Protocol of a Randomized Switch Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mona Redlich Bossy; Daniel Mueller; Erich Seifritz; Stefan Vetter; Stephan T Egger
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-08-12

3.  Measurement properties of the Swedish clinical outcomes in routine evaluation outcome measures (CORE-OM): Rasch analysis and short version for depressed and anxious out-patients in a multicultural area.

Authors:  Louise Danielsson; Magnus L Elfström; Javier Galan Henche; Jeanette Melin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Patients' and Psychologists' Preferences for Feedback Reports on Expected Mental Health Treatment Outcomes: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Loes Hilhorst; Jip van der Stappen; Joran Lokkerbol; Mickaël Hiligsmann; Anna H Risseeuw; Bea G Tiemens
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2022-04-15

5.  Complexity and potentials of clinical feedback in mental health: an in-depth study of patient processes.

Authors:  Stig Magne Solstad; Gøril Solberg Kleiven; Christian Moltu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.147

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.