Literature DB >> 31198001

[Application of standardized venous thromboembolism prevention program in burn patients].

Yanqiong Wang1, Jianqiong Huang1, Xuewen Xu2, Junjie Chen3, Zhihui Wu1, Jiali Gao1, Jing Tang1, Min Hu1, Xia Yu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardized venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention program for burn patients and verify its safety and effectiveness by comparing with traditional thrombus prophylaxis.
METHODS: All burn patients admitted and met selection criteria betweem April 2017 and September 2018 were included. Patients between January 2018 and September 2018 were included as the interventional group to implement standardized VTE prevention programs, while patients between April 2017 and December 2017 were included as the control group and traditional active and passive exercises were used to prevent VTE. There was no significant difference in the age, gender, ethnic group, marriage, education, occupation, type and site of the injury, burn area, operation time, and hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05), which was comparable. The incidence of VTE, number of cases of tissue or organ hemorrhage, survival rate of skin grafting, and time of wound healing were compared.
RESULTS: The incidence of VTE was obviously lower in the interventional group (1.56%, 1/64) than in the control group (10.17%, 6/59) ( χ 2=-2.05, P=0.04). No bleeding occurred in any tissue or organ in the two groups. The survival rate of skin grafting and the time of wound healing were 89.06% (57/64) and (11.78±3.08) days respectively in the interventional group and 91.53% (54/59) and (11.66±2.30) days respectively in the control group; and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant ( χ 2=0.21, P=0.65; t=-0.22, P=0.83).
CONCLUSION: The standardized VTE prevention program can effectively prevent the occurrence of VTE, and its safety is relatively high.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Venous thromboembolism; burn; complication; prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31198001      PMCID: PMC8355775          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201812061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  15 in total

Review 1.  Evolving concepts in thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  S Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Venous thrombosis incidence in burn patients: preliminary results of a prospective study.

Authors:  W L Wahl; M M Brandt; K S Ahrns; P J Zajkowski; M C Proctor; T W Wakefield; L J Greenfield
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

3.  Procedure-specific venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a paradigm from colectomy surgery.

Authors:  Peter K Henke; Shipra Arya; Chris Pannucci; Jim Kubus; Samantha Hendren; Michael Engelsbe; Darrell Campbell
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  A survey of current practice patterns in prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) and gastrointestinal (GI) ulceration among Canadian burn centers.

Authors:  Nasim Abedi; Anthony Papp
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Joseph Ornelas; Allen Blaivas; David Jimenez; Henri Bounameaux; Menno Huisman; Christopher S King; Timothy A Morris; Namita Sood; Scott M Stevens; Janine R E Vintch; Philip Wells; Scott C Woller; Lisa Moores
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Clinically significant venous thromboembolic complications in burn patients receiving unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin as prophylaxis.

Authors:  Jennifer Bushwitz; Aimée LeClaire; Jinghua He; David Mozingo
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

7.  Enoxaparin dose adjustment is associated with low incidence of venous thromboembolic events in acute burn patients.

Authors:  Hsin Lin; Iris Faraklas; Jeffrey Saffle; Amalia Cochran
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-12

Review 8.  Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Thermal Injury: A Review of Risk Assessment Tools and Current Knowledge on the Effectiveness and Risks of Mechanical and Chemical Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Andrea T Obi; Benjamin H Timmins; Amalia L Cochran
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.017

9.  Fondaparinux combined with intermittent pneumatic compression vs. intermittent pneumatic compression alone for prevention of venous thromboembolism after abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind comparison.

Authors:  A G G Turpie; K A Bauer; J A Caprini; P C Comp; M Gent; J E Muntz
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 10.  Practice guidelines for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in burns.

Authors:  Lee D Faucher; Kathe M Conlon
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.