| Literature DB >> 31197979 |
Baolan Ji1, Huili Wei1, Yao Ding1, Huimin Liang1, Lu Yao1, Hang Wang1, Hua Qu1, Huacong Deng1.
Abstract
AIMS/Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Diabetic retinopathy; α-Klotho
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31197979 PMCID: PMC6944830 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Investig ISSN: 2040-1116 Impact factor: 4.232
Comparison of clinical and biochemical data of subjects
| Variable | NC ( | DM ( |
| DM |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDR ( | NPDR ( | PDR ( | |||||
| Sex, males (%) | 52.9% | 63.3% | 0.574 | 55.6% | 64.7% | 68.7% | 0.524 |
| Age (years) | 57.0 ± 5.1 | 57.8 ± 5.6 | 0.595 | 58.0 ± 4.7 | 57.4 ± 5.5 | 57.9 ± 7.1 | 0.925 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.00 ± 3.51 | 24.15 ± 3.20 | 0.228 | 24.00 ± 2.85 | 23.85 ± 3.46 | 24.95 ± 3.68 | 0.623 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 120.0 ± 10.8 | 138.9 ± 20.1 | 0.001 | 135.5 ± 17.0 | 140.6 ± 23.5 | 142.9 ± 21.3 | 0.478 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 75.9 ± 8.6 | 83.0 ± 12.5 | 0.046 | 81.7 ± 12.2 | 82.2 ± 15.0 | 86.2 ± 10.4 | 0.505 |
| HDL‐c (mmol/L) | 1.52 ± 0.34 | 1.12 ± 0.28 | <0.001 | 1.13 ± 0.32 | 1.05 ± 0.18 | 1.18 ± 0.28 | 0.468 |
| LDL‐c (mmol/L) | 2.92 ± 0.44 | 2.81 ± 0.95 | 0.626 | 2.82 ± 0.92 | 2.65 ± 1.08 | 3.01 ± 0.87 | 0.622 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.90 ± 0.61 | 4.30 ± 1.21 | 0.053 | 4.36 ± 1.12 | 3.91 ± 1.37 | 4.77 ± 1.06 | 0.176 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.37 (1.10–2.25) | 1.38 (0.97–2.35) | 0.837 | 1.42 (0.89–2.13) | 1.33 (0.92–2.51) | 1.41 (1.15–2.65) | 0.759 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.28 ± 0.30 | 8.57 ± 3.04 | <0.001 | 8.21 ± 2.78 | 9.19 ± 3.51 | 8.50 ± 3.02 | 0.588 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 74.24 ± 12.57 | 74.53 ± 22.69 | 0.959 | 59.41 ± 11.76 | 80.47 ± 21.06 | 93.75 ± 21.59 | <0.001 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 5.73 ± 1.07 | 6.97 ± 2.91 | 0.090 | 5.56 ± 1.41 | 6.98 ± 2.73 | 9.33 ± 3.52 | <0.001 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 342.29 ± 70.50 | 326.43 ± 84.17 | 0.481 | 278.67 ± 66.13 | 360.47 ± 76.85 | 370.88 ± 80.39 | <0.001 |
| Duration (years) | 6.0 (2.0–10.0) | 9.0 (6.5–12.0) | 10.0 (7.3–18.5) | 0.032 | |||
| HbA1c (%) | 9.80 ± 2.00 | 10.16 ± 2.30 | 7.94 ± 1.59 | 0.004 | |||
| DN (%) | 40.7% | 52.9% | 56.2% | 0.556 | |||
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed variables, and the median (interquartile ranges) for abnormal distributions. Unpaired t‐test and Mann–Whitney U‐test were used for comparisons of normally and abnormally distributed continuous variables between two groups, respectively. Multiple and pairwise comparisons were determined by analysis of variance and Student–Newman–Keuls tests for normally distributed data, and Kruskal–Wallis and stepwise–step‐down tests for abnormal distributions. Categorical variables were presented as the percentage (%). The χ2‐test was used to compare categorical variables. Statistical differences were defined by P‐values (two‐tailed) <0.05.
*P < 0.05 versus without diabetic retinopathy (NDR).
**P < 0.05, proliferative diabetic retinopathy versus non‐proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
BMI, body mass index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; DN, diabetic nephropathy; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HDL‐c, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐c, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; Scr, serum creatinine; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; UA, uric acid.
Figure 1Serum klotho (KL) levels in diabetes and diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients. (a) Comparison of serum KL levels between healthy control participants (NC group; n = 17) and diabetes patients (DM group; n = 60). (b) Comparison of serum KL levels among diabetes patients without diabetic retinopathy (NDR; n = 27), diabetes patients with non‐proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR; n = 17) and diabetes patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR; n = 16). Data are represented as box plots. A Mann–Whitney U‐test was used for comparisons of continuous variables between two groups. Kruskal–Wallis and stepwise–step‐down tests were used for multiple and pairwise comparisons. Statistical differences were defined by P‐values (two‐tailed) <0.05. † P < 0.05 versus NDR group.
Figure 2Effects of different concentrations of palmitic acid (PA) on cell viability. human retinal endothelial cells were treated with different concentrations of PA (0, 200, 400, 800 μmol/L). After the treatments for 24 h, cell viability was assessed by cell counting kit‐8 assay. Data are represented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3). Analysis of variance and Student–Newman–Keuls tests were carried out for multiple and pairwise comparisons. Statistical differences were defined by P‐values (two‐tailed) <0.05. † P < 0.05 versus 0 μmol/L; ‡ P < 0.05 versus 200 μmol/L; § P < 0.05 versus 400 μmol/L. OD, optical density.
Figure 3Effects of klotho (KL) protein on palmitic acid (PA)‐induced apoptosis in human retinal endothelial cells. Cells were pretreated with recombinant human KL protein (400 pmol/L) for 1 h and then treated with PA (400 μmol/L) for 24 h. (a,b) The cell apoptosis rate was detected using flow cytometry analysis. (c,d) Levels of Bcl‐2 and Bax were detected by western blot analysis. Data are represented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3). Analysis of variance and Student–Newman–Keuls tests were carried out for multiple and pairwise comparisons. Statistical differences were defined by P‐values (two‐tailed) <0.05. † P < 0.05 versus control (Ctr) group; ‡ P < 0.05 versus PA group.
Figure 4Klotho (KL) protein inhibited palmitic acid (PA)‐induced apoptosis by activating the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase‐serine∕threonine kinase (PI3K/Akt) pathway in human retinal endothelial cells. Cells were pre‐incubated with the PI3K inhibitor, LY294002 (10 μmol/L), for 1 h, followed by co‐treatment with recombinant human KL protein (400 pmol/L) for 1 h and then with PA (400 μmol/L) for 24 h. (a,b) Level of p‐Akt was detected by western blot analysis. (c,d) Levels of Bcl‐2 and Bax were detected by western blot analysis. Data are represented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3). Analysis of variance and Student–Newman–Keuls tests were carried out for multiple and pairwise comparisons. Statistical differences were defined by P‐values (two‐tailed) <0.05. † P < 0.05 versus control (Ctr) group; ‡ P < 0.05 versus PA group; § P < 0.05 versus PA + KL group. LY, LY294002.