Literature DB >> 31197757

Concepts of objects and substances in language.

Lance J Rips1, Susan J Hespos2.   

Abstract

People distinguish objects from the substances that constitute them. Many languages also distinguish count nouns and mass nouns. What is the relation between these two distinctions? The connection between them is complicated by the facts that (a) some mass nouns (e.g., toast) seem to name countable objects; (b) some count and mass nouns (e.g., pots and pottery) seem to name the same objects; (c) nouns for seemingly the same things can be count in one language (English: dishes) but mass in another (French: la vaisselle); (d) count nouns can be used to name substances (There is carrot in the soup) and mass nouns to name portions (She drank three whiskeys); and (e) some languages (e.g., Mandarin) appear to have no count nouns, whereas others (e.g., Yudja) appear to have no mass nouns. All these cases counter a simple object-to-count-noun and substance-to-mass-noun relation, but they provide opportunities to see whether the grammatical distinction affects the referential one. We examine evidence from such cases and find continuity through development: Infants appear to have the conceptual OBJECT/SUBSTANCE distinction very early on. Although this distinction may change with development, the acquisition of count/mass syntax does not appear to be an effective factor for change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concepts; Mass and count nouns; Object concepts; Substance concepts

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31197757     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01613-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  35 in total

1.  2.5-month-old infants' reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded.

Authors:  A Aguiar; R Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The mass/count distinction: evidence from on-line psycholinguistic performance.

Authors:  B Gillon; E Kehayia; V Taler
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond?

Authors:  L K Samuelson; L B Smith
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-11-09

4.  Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff.

Authors:  Sandeep Prasada; Krag Ferenz; Todd Haskell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-03

5.  Attentive tracking of objects versus substances.

Authors:  Kristy VanMarle; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

6.  Origins of knowledge.

Authors:  E S Spelke; K Breinlinger; J Macomber; K Jacobson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning.

Authors:  Eliana Colunga; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: a surprising discrepancy.

Authors:  S J Hespos; R Baillargeon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

9.  Conceptual precursors to language.

Authors:  Susan J Hespos; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Understanding spatial relations: flexible infants, lexical adults.

Authors:  Laraine McDonough; Soonja Choi; Jean M Mandler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Coordination of Caregiver Naming and Children's Exploration of Solid Objects and Nonsolid Substances.

Authors:  Lynn K Perry; Stephanie A Custode; Regina M Fasano; Brittney M Gonzalez; Adriana M Valtierra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.