| Literature DB >> 31197509 |
Can Gökgöl1, Nicolas Diehm2, Lorenz Räber3, Philippe Büchler4.
Abstract
Endovascular therapy in patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease shows high rates of restenosis. The poor clinical outcomes are commonly explained by the demanding mechanical environment due to leg movements, but the mechanisms responsible for restenosis remain unknown. In this study, we hypothesized that restenosis following revascularization is associated with hemodynamical markers derived from blood flow during leg flexion. Therefore, we performed personalized computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses of 20 patients, who underwent routine endovascular femoro-popliteal interventions. The CFD analyses were conducted using 3D models of the arterial geometry in straight and flexed positions, which were reconstructed from 2D angiographic images. Based on restenosis rates reported at 6-month follow-up, logistic regression analyses were performed to predict restenosis from hemodynamical parameters. Results showed that severe arterial deformations, such as kinking, induced by leg flexion in stented arteries led to adverse hemodynamic conditions that may trigger restenosis. A logistic regression analysis based solely on hemodynamical markers had an accuracy of 75%, which showed that flow parameters are sufficient to predict restenosis (p = 0.031). However, better predictions were achieved by adding the treatment method in the model. This suggests that a more accurate image acquisition technique is required to capture the localized modifications of blood flow following intervention, especially around the stented artery. This approach, based on the immediate postoperative configuration of the artery, has the potential to identify patients at increased risk of restenosis. Based on this information, clinicians could take preventive measures and more closely follow these patients to avoid complications.Entities:
Keywords: 2D/3D reconstruction; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Endovascular therapy; Femoro-popliteal (FP) arteries; Leg flexion; Patient-specific
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31197509 PMCID: PMC6825029 DOI: 10.1007/s10237-019-01183-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomech Model Mechanobiol ISSN: 1617-7940
Lesion characteristics, treatment details, presence of arterial kinking with leg flexion, and clinical outcome at 6-month follow-up
| Patient | Lesion location | Lesion length (mm) | Level of calcification | Brand of the stent/balloon; diameter (mm) × length (mm) | Kinking/restenosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Distal SFA/popliteal | 180 | Moderate | Pulsar 18a; 6 × 200 | +/+ |
| 2 | CFA/distal SFA | 350 | Severe | 2× Protégé Everflexb; 6 × 200 | +/+ |
| 3 | Mid-/distal SFA | 350 | Severe | Pulsar 18; 5 × 200 | +/+ |
| 4 | Distal SFA/popliteal | 180 | Moderate | Pulsar 18; 6 × 200 | +/+ |
| 5 | Popliteal | 70 | Moderate | Pulsar 18; 5 × 80 | +/+ |
| 6 | Distal SFA | 100 | Moderate | Zilver PTXc; 6 × 120 | +/− |
| 7 | Mid-/distal SFA | 100 | Moderate | Zilver PTX; 6 × 120 | +/− |
| 8 | Proximal/distal SFA | 400 | Severe | 2 × Protégé Everflex; 6 × 200 | −/− |
| 9 | Proximal/distal SFA | 350 | Severe | 2 × Pulsar 18; 5 × 200 | −/− |
| 10 | Mid-SFA | 80 | Severe | Protégé Everflex; 5 × 100 | −/− |
| 11 | Popliteal | 80 | Moderate | 3 × PTA; 4 × 40 | −/+ |
| 12 | Mid-/distal SFA | 10 | Moderate | PTA; 6 × 20 | −/+ |
| 13 | Distal SFA | 50 | Moderate | PTA; 4 × 40 | −/− |
| 14 | Distal SFA | 40 | Moderate | PTA; 4 × 40 | −/− |
| 15 | Distal SFA | 10 | Moderate | PTA; 4 × 20 | −/− |
| 16 | Mid-SFA | 50 | Moderate | PTA; 5 × 40 | −/− |
| 17 | Mid-/distal SFA | 50 | Moderate | PTA; 5 × 40 | −/− |
| 18 | Mid-/distal SFA | 40 | Moderate | PTA; 4 × 60 | −/− |
| 19 | Distal SFA/popliteal | 80 | Moderate | 2 × PTA; 4 × 40 | −/− |
| 20 | Mid-/distal SFA | 100 | Moderate | 3 × PTA; 5 × 40 | −/− |
CFA common femoral artery, SFA superficial femoral artery, PTA percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; +/− represents true/false conditions
aBiotronik AG, Bülach, Switzerland
bMedtronic, Mansfield, MA, USA
cCook Medical Inc, Bloomington, IN, USA
Fig. 1An example of the geometry, mesh, and boundary conditions used in the CFD analyses. The patient-specific geometry of an artery in the flexed leg position is presented in the middle (beige). The longitudinal view shows the tetrahedral surface mesh along the length of the artery (blue), while the cross-sectional view illustrates the mesh inflation toward the wall (black). An MRI-measured volumetric flow rate and a zero-pressure opening are applied as boundary conditions at the inlet and outlet, respectively (Mohajer et al. 2006)
Areas of the FP artery affected by low TAWSS (< 0.5 Pa), high TAWSS (> 7 Pa), and high OSI (> 0.3) in straight and flexed leg positions
| Datasets |
| Areas affected by adverse flow behaviors (cm2; Mean ± Std) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low TAWSS | High TAWSS | High OSI | ||||||||
| Straight | Flexed | Straight | Flexed | Straight | Flexed | |||||
| Complete | 20 | 1.8 ± 2.4 | 3.4 ± 3.6 | 0.113 | 0.6 ± 1.1 | 0.5 ± 0.9 | 0.587 | 6.5 ± 3.3 | 5.7 ± 3.5 | 0.486 |
| Stent | 10 | 0.9 ± 1.5 | 4.4 ± 4.6 |
| 0.5 ± 1.1 | 0.4 ± 1.0 | 0.795 | 9.0 ± 2.9 | 8.1 ± 3.5 | 0.532 |
| PTA | 10 | 2.7 ± 3.0 | 2.4 ± 2.0 | 0.789 | 0.8 ± 1.2 | 0.5 ± 0.8 | 0.628 | 4.0 ± 1.2 | 3.4 ± 1.1 | 0.256 |
| 0.119 | 0.221 | 0.623 | 0.714 |
|
| |||||
| Kinked | 7 | 1.3 ± 1.7 | 5.9 ± 4.5 |
| 0.7 ± 1.3 | 0.5 ± 1.2 | 0.826 | 8.6 ± 2.6 | 8.7 ± 3.7 | 0.953 |
| Non-kinked | 13 | 2.1 ± 2.8 | 1.6 ± 2.0 | 0.954 | 0.6 ± 1.1 | 0.4 ± 0.7 | 0.608 | 5.4 ± 3.2 | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 0.269 |
| 0.426 |
| 0.952 | 0.876 |
|
| |||||
| Restenosis | 7 | 2.6 ± 3.3 | 5.6 ± 4.3 | 0.180 | 0.7 ± 1.5 | 0.5 ± 1.0 | 0.685 | 7.5 ± 3.5 | 6.6 ± 3.6 | 0.631 |
| No restenosis | 13 | 1.4 ± 1.9 | 2.2 ± 2.6 | 0.351 | 0.6 ± 1.0 | 0.5 ± 0.8 | 0.743 | 5.9 ± 3.3 | 5.3 ± 3.4 | 0.618 |
| 0.372 | 0.097 | 0.807 | 0.982 | 0.340 | 0.440 | |||||
Bold indicates statistically significant values
The area is reported for the complete dataset, as well as for groups defined by different treatment methods, presence of kinking observed in the flexed leg positions, and clinical outcome. N denotes the number of patients for each group, while p* and p** represent the outcomes of the t tests between different leg positions and different groups, respectively
The main results from the logistic regression analyses of the non-flow, flow, mixed model-I (flow + treatment method), and mixed model-II (flow + kinking + lesion length + age + plaque morphology)
| Models |
| Acc. (%) | AUC |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-flow model | 0.10 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.13 |
| Flow model | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.29 |
| Mixed model-I | 0.002 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.38 |
| Mixed model-II | 0.01 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.33 |
The table reports, for each model, the statistical significance between the restenosed and non-restenosed patients based on the prediction of the model (p value); the leave-one-out accuracy (Acc. in %); the area under the curve (AUC); and the McFadden’s pseudo-R2. The non-flow parameters were not able to predict the restenosis at 6 months (non-flow model), while a model based solely on flow markers provided a statistical difference between the two groups (flow model). Moreover, the inclusion of the treatment method to the flow model as an additional predictor (mixed model-I) was able to improve the prediction, which was not the case with the other non-flow predictors (mixed model-II)
Fig. 2The prediction of restenosis based on the logistic regression of the non-flow (left), flow (middle), and mixed model-I right). The latter two showed a statistically significant difference between the restenosed and non-restenosed patients. The mean difference between the predicted values for the two groups was larger for the mixed model, resulting in a more significant p value when treatment method was considered as an additional predictor in the model
Fig. 3The TAWSS distribution in a stented artery that exhibited arterial kinking during leg flexion. The X-ray images were acquired in the straight and flexed leg positions and show the locations of the stented region and the arterial kink when the leg is flexed. The location of the atheroprone areas described by the TAWSS < 0.5 Pa were concentrated around the vicinity of the kink or highly curved segment