Literature DB >> 31197018

Modeling Corticosteroid Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Part III: Estrous Cycle and Estrogen Receptor-Dependent Antagonism of Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper (GILZ) Enhancement by Corticosteroids.

Vivaswath S Ayyar1, Debra C DuBois1, Richard R Almon1, William J Jusko2.   

Abstract

Our previous report examined the pharmacokinetics (PK) of methylprednisolone (MPL) and adrenal suppression after a 50 mg/kg IM bolus in male and female rats, and we described in detail the development of a minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (mPBPK/PD) model. In continuation of such assessments, we investigated sex differences in genomic MPL responses (PD). Message expression of the glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) was chosen as a multitissue biomarker of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated drug response. Potential time-dependent interplay between sex hormone and glucocorticoid signaling in vivo was assessed by comparing the enhancement of GILZ by MPL in the uterus [high estrogen receptor (ER) density] and in liver (lower ER density) from male and female rats dosed within the proestrus (high estradiol/progesterone) and estrus (low estradiol/progesterone) phases of the rodent estrous cycle. An expanded-systems PD model of MPL considering circadian rhythms, multireceptor (ER and GR) control, and estrous variations delineated the determinants controlling receptor/gene-mediated steroid responses. Hepatic GILZ response was ∼3-fold greater in females, regardless of estrous stage, compared with males, driven predominantly by increased MPL exposure in females and a negligible influence of estrogen interaction. In contrast, GILZ response in the uterus during proestrus in females was 60% of that observed in estrus-phased females, despite no PK or receptor differences, providing in vivo support to the hypothesis of estrogen-mediated antagonism of glucocorticoid signaling. The developed model offers a mechanistic platform to assess the determinants of sex and tissue specificity in corticosteroid actions and, in turn, reveals a unique PD drug-hormone interaction occurring in vivo. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Mechanisms relating to sex-based pharmacodynamic variability in genomic responses to corticosteroids have been unclear. Using combined experimental and systems pharmacology modeling approaches, sex differences in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms controlling the enhancement of a sensitive corticosteroid-regulated biomarker, the glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ), were clarified in vivo. The multiscale minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamic model successfully captured the experimental observations and quantitatively discerned the roles of the rodent estrous cycle (hormonal variation) and tissue specificity in mediating the antagonistic coregulation of GILZ gene synthesis. These findings collectively support the hypothesis that estrogens antagonize pharmacodynamic signaling of genomic corticosteroid actions in vivo in a time- and estrogen receptor-dependent manner.
Copyright © 2019 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31197018      PMCID: PMC6658921          DOI: 10.1124/jpet.119.257543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  45 in total

1.  Role of baseline parameters in determining indirect pharmacodynamic responses.

Authors:  Y N Sun; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments.

Authors:  Stephen A Bustin; Vladimir Benes; Jeremy A Garson; Jan Hellemans; Jim Huggett; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Cooperative binding of steroid hormone receptors contributes to transcriptional synergism at target enhancer elements.

Authors:  S Y Tsai; M J Tsai; B W O'Malley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Glucocorticoid-recognizing and -effector sites in rat liver plasma membrane. Kinetics of corticosterone uptake by isolated membrane vesicles. III. Specificity and stereospecificity.

Authors:  C Lackner; S Daufeldt; L Wildt; A Alléra
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  Estrogen receptor in liver of male and female rats: endocrine regulation and molecular properties.

Authors:  R B Dickson; A J Eisenfeld
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Modeling Corticosteroid Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Part I: Determination and Prediction of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone Tissue Binding in the Rat.

Authors:  Vivaswath S Ayyar; Dawei Song; Debra C DuBois; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Modeling Corticosteroid Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Part II: Sex Differences in Methylprednisolone Pharmacokinetics and Corticosterone Suppression.

Authors:  Vivaswath S Ayyar; Debra C DuBois; Toshimichi Nakamura; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and receptor-mediated pharmacodynamics of corticosteroids.

Authors:  W J Jusko
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 9.  Homologous down regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor: the molecular machinery.

Authors:  R H Oakley; J A Cidlowski
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.807

10.  Estradiol antagonism of glucocorticoid-induced GILZ expression in human uterine epithelial cells and murine uterus.

Authors:  Shannon Whirledge; John A Cidlowski
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 4.736

View more
  6 in total

1.  Modeling Corticosteroid Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Part I: Determination and Prediction of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone Tissue Binding in the Rat.

Authors:  Vivaswath S Ayyar; Dawei Song; Debra C DuBois; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Modeling Corticosteroid Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Part II: Sex Differences in Methylprednisolone Pharmacokinetics and Corticosterone Suppression.

Authors:  Vivaswath S Ayyar; Debra C DuBois; Toshimichi Nakamura; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 3.  Transitioning from Basic toward Systems Pharmacodynamic Models: Lessons from Corticosteroids.

Authors:  Vivaswath S Ayyar; William J Jusko
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  Potential Transcriptional Biomarkers to Guide Glucocorticoid Replacement in Autoimmune Addison's Disease.

Authors:  Åse Bjorvatn Sævik; Anette B Wolff; Sigridur Björnsdottir; Katerina Simunkova; Martha Schei Hynne; David William Peter Dolan; Eirik Bratland; Per M Knappskog; Paal Methlie; Siri Carlsen; Magnus Isaksson; Sophie Bensing; Olle Kämpe; Eystein S Husebye; Kristian Løvås; Marianne Øksnes
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 5.  Sexual Dimorphism of Corticosteroid Signaling during Kidney Development.

Authors:  Margaux Laulhé; Laurence Dumeige; Thi An Vu; Imene Hani; Eric Pussard; Marc Lombès; Say Viengchareun; Laetitia Martinerie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Circadian rhythms: influence on physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Vivaswath S Ayyar; Siddharth Sukumaran
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.745

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.