| Literature DB >> 31196986 |
Martin Bulla1,2,3, Jeroen Reneerkens2,4, Emily L Weiser5, Aleksandr Sokolov6, Audrey R Taylor7, Benoît Sittler8,9, Brian J McCaffery10, Dan R Ruthrauff11, Daniel H Catlin12, David C Payer13, David H Ward11, Diana V Solovyeva14, Eduardo S A Santos15, Eldar Rakhimberdiev4,16, Erica Nol17, Eunbi Kwon12, Glen S Brown18, Glenda D Hevia19, H River Gates20, James A Johnson21, Jan A van Gils2, Jannik Hansen22, Jean-François Lamarre23, Jennie Rausch24, Jesse R Conklin4, Joe Liebezeit25, Joël Bêty26, Johannes Lang9,27, José A Alves28,29, Juan Fernández-Elipe30, Klaus-Michael Exo31, Loïc Bollache32, Marcelo Bertellotti19, Marie-Andrée Giroux33, Martijn van de Pol34, Matthew Johnson35, Megan L Boldenow36, Mihai Valcu37, Mikhail Soloviev16, Natalya Sokolova6, Nathan R Senner38, Nicolas Lecomte39, Nicolas Meyer9,32, Niels Martin Schmidt22,40, Olivier Gilg9,32, Paul A Smith41, Paula Machín30, Rebecca L McGuire42, Ricardo A S Cerboncini43, Richard Ottvall44, Rob S A van Bemmelen45, Rose J Swift46, Sarah T Saalfeld21, Sarah E Jamieson47, Stephen Brown48, Theunis Piersma2,4, Tomas Albrecht49,50, Verónica D'Amico19, Richard B Lanctot21, Bart Kempenaers1.
Abstract
Kubelka et al (Reports, 9 November 2018, p. 680) claim that climate change has disrupted patterns of nest predation in shorebirds. They report that predation rates have increased since the 1950s, especially in the Arctic. We describe methodological problems with their analyses and argue that there is no solid statistical support for their claims.Mesh：
Year: 2019 PMID： 31196986 DOI： 10.1126/science.aaw8529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN： 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728