Literature DB >> 31196645

Preferences of Patients and At-risk Individuals for Preventive Approaches to Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Marie Falahee1, Axel Finckh2, Karim Raza3, Mark Harrison4.   

Abstract

Effective treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are available and can lead to remission for some patients, but most patients remain on potentially toxic and expensive medications in the long term. Interest is increasingly turning to the disease phases preceding the development of RA that represent opportunities for preventive interventions. At-risk target populations include individuals with genetic and environmental risk factors, those who have developed systemic autoimmunity, and those who have developed clinically suspect symptoms (eg, arthralgias without synovitis, or an early arthritis). Ongoing prospective studies will inform the development of increasingly accurate predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of developing RA. Furthermore, a range of preventive approaches has been suggested, including lifestyle modification (eg, smoking cessation) and pharmacologic interventions (eg, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, abatacept, rituximab) that are currently the subject of randomized controlled trials. As prediction and prevention of RA evolve, it is increasingly likely that individuals at risk (including asymptomatic individuals) may be faced with complex decisions about whether to accept assessment of their risk status or to take a preventive intervention associated with risk of serious adverse events and uncertain benefit. Acceptance of preventive medication in other contexts can be low. For example, <25% of women at high risk of breast cancer are willing to take preventive hormonal treatments. Actual uptake is lower still. Patients' beliefs and preferences predict treatment uptake and adherence. Before the dream of preventing RA can become reality, health care providers need to understand the perspectives of individuals in the target population and to identify barriers and facilitators for this approach. This commentary reviews what is currently known about the perspectives of patients and individuals at risk about predictive and preventive approaches for RA and identifies gaps to be addressed to inform the development of efficient preventive strategies.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Treatment preferences; preventive treatment; rheumatoid arthritis; risk quantification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31196645     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  11 in total

Review 1.  Pre-RA: Can early diagnosis lead to prevention?

Authors:  Salina Haville; Kevin D Deane
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 2.  Perspectives of at-Risk Individuals on Preventive Intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Marie Falahee; Karim Raza
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 3.  Rheumatoid Arthritis Pathogenesis, Prediction, and Prevention: An Emerging Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Kevin D Deane; V Michael Holers
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 10.995

4.  The earlier, the better or the worse? Towards accurate management of patients with arthralgia at risk for RA.

Authors:  Annette van der Helm-van Mil; Robert B M Landewé
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Rheumatoid arthritis CD14+ monocytes display metabolic and inflammatory dysfunction, a phenotype that precedes clinical manifestation of disease.

Authors:  Trudy McGarry; Megan M Hanlon; Viviana Marzaioli; Clare C Cunningham; Vinod Krishna; Kieran Murray; Conor Hurson; Phil Gallagher; Sunil Nagpal; Douglas J Veale; Ursula Fearon
Journal:  Clin Transl Immunology       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 6.  Systematic review of quantitative preference studies of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis among patients and at-risk populations.

Authors:  Gwenda Simons; Joshua Caplan; Rachael L DiSantostefano; Jorien Veldwijk; Matthias Englbrecht; Karin Schölin Bywall; Ulrik Kihlbom; Karim Raza; Marie Falahee
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Public perceptions of predictive testing for rheumatoid arthritis compared to breast cancer and early-onset Alzheimer's disease: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Juhi Singhal; Imogen Wells; Gwenda Simons; Sabine Wöhlke; Karim Raza; Marie Falahee
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2022-03-02

Review 8.  Challenges and Opportunities of Targeted Behavioral Interventions for Groups at Risk for Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Alessandra Zaccardelli; Jeffrey A Sparks
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 9.  The Role of Ultrasound Across the Inflammatory Arthritis Continuum: Focus on "At-Risk" Individuals.

Authors:  Laurence Duquenne; Rahaymin Chowdhury; Kulveer Mankia; Paul Emery
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-10-30

10.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus, glycaemic control, associated therapies and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dawit T Zemedikun; Krishna Gokhale; Joht Singh Chandan; Jennifer Cooper; Janet M Lord; Andrew Filer; Marie Falahee; Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar; Karim Raza
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.