Literature DB >> 31196460

ACC/AHA Versus ESC/ESH on Hypertension Guidelines: JACC Guideline Comparison.

George Bakris1, Waleed Ali2, Gianfranco Parati3.   

Abstract

This study compares the recommendations of the most recent American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Hypertension (ESH) blood pressure guidelines. Both guidelines represent updates of previous guidelines and reinforce previous concepts of prevention regarding elevated blood pressure. Specifically, a low-sodium diet, exercise, body weight reduction, low to moderate alcohol intake, and adequate potassium intake are emphasized. Overall, both guidelines agree on the proper method of blood pressure measurement, the use of home blood pressure and ambulatory monitoring, and restricted use of beta-blockers as first-line therapy. The major disagreements are with the level of blood pressure defining hypertension, flexibility in identifying blood pressure targets for treatment, and the use of initial combination therapy. Although initial single-pill combination therapy is strongly recommended in both guidelines, the ESC/ESH guideline recommends it as initial therapy in patients at ≥140/90 mm Hg. The ACC/AHA guideline recommends its use in patients >20/10 mm Hg above blood pressure goal. Thus, the only real disagreement is that the ACC/AHA guidelines maintain that all people with blood pressure >130/80 mm Hg have hypertension, and blood pressure should be lowered to <130/80 mm Hg in all. In contrast, the ESC/ESH guidelines state that hypertension is defined as >140/90 mm Hg, with the goal being a level <140/90 mm Hg for all targeting to <130/80 mm Hg only in those at high cardiovascular risk, but always considering individual tolerability of the proposed goal.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; guidelines; hypertension; lifestyle; mortality; outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31196460     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  52 in total

1.  Diversity is richness: why data reporting according to sex, age, and ethnicity matters.

Authors:  Thomas F Lüscher; Virginia M Miller; C Noel Bairey Merz; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Is Low-Intensity Isometric Handgrip Exercise an Efficient Alternative in Lifestyle Blood Pressure Management? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrés F Loaiza-Betancur; Iván Chulvi-Medrano
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Authors:  John W McEvoy; Natalie Daya; Faisal Rahman; Ron C Hoogeveen; Roger S Blumenthal; Amil M Shah; Christie M Ballantyne; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Variation in hypertension clinical practice guidelines: a global comparison.

Authors:  Richu Philip; Thomas Beaney; Nick Appelbaum; Carmen Rodriguez Gonzalvez; Charlotte Koldeweij; Amelia Kataria Golestaneh; Neil Poulter; Jonathan M Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Simple risk score to screen for prediabetes: A cross-sectional study from the Qatar Biobank cohort.

Authors:  Mostafa Abbas; Raghvendra Mall; Khaoula Errafii; Abdelkader Lattab; Ehsan Ullah; Halima Bensmail; Abdelilah Arredouani
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.232

Review 6.  Evidence for and Against ACC/AHA 2017 Guideline for Target Systolic Blood Pressure of < 130 mmHg in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Susanne B Nicholas; Sandra Williams; Keith C Norris
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 3.955

7.  Time-Restricted Feeding and Metabolic Outcomes in a Cohort of Italian Adults.

Authors:  Walter Currenti; Silvio Buscemi; Raffaele Ivan Cincione; Achille Cernigliaro; Justyna Godos; Giuseppe Grosso; Fabio Galvano
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Patients With MEN1 Are at an Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Maya E Lee; Yashira M Ortega-Sustache; Sunita K Agarwal; Aisha Tepede; James Welch; Adel Mandl; Rashika Bansal; Amit Tirosh; Paolo Piaggi; Craig Cochran; William F Simonds; Lee S Weinstein; Jenny E Blau
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Pregnancy Outcomes and Blood Pressure Visit-to-Visit Variability and Level in Three Less-Developed Countries.

Authors:  Laura A Magee; Jeffrey Bone; Salwa Banoo Owasil; Joel Singer; Terry Lee; Mrutunjaya B Bellad; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Alexander G Logan; Salésio E Macuacua; Ashalata A Mallapur; Hannah L Nathan; Rahat N Qureshi; Esperança Sevene; Andrew H Shennan; Anifa Valá; Marianne Vidler; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Peter von Dadelszen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 10.  Ten things to know about ten cardiovascular disease risk factors ("ASPC Top Ten - 2020").

Authors:  Harold Edward Bays
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.