| Literature DB >> 31195837 |
Xianling Gong1, Yi Zheng2, Guangzhi He2, Kebing Chen3, Xiaowei Zeng4, Zhihong Chen1,5.
Abstract
With high morbidity and death rates, liver cancer has become one of the most common cancers in the world. But, most chemotherapeutic anticancer drugs have high toxicity as well as low specificity. To improve the treatment modalities and enhance the therapeutic effect of liver cancer, a brand new liver-targeting nanoparticle (NP), Ent-11α-hydroxy-15-oxo-kaur-16-en-19-oic acid (5 F)-loaded cholic acid (CA)-functionalized star-shaped poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lactobionic acid (LA) (5 F-loaded CA-PLGA-PEG-LA), was developed. The particle size, zeta potential, size distribution, surface morphology, drug loading content, drug encapsulation efficiency and drug release of 5 F-loaded NPs were characterized. Confocal microscopy and flow cytometry showed that the prepared NPs could be internalized by HepG2 cells. Furthermore, the cellular uptake efficiency of coumarin 6-loaded CA-PLGA-PEG-LA NPs was much better in compare with that of CA-PLGA-PEG and CA-PLGA NPs. Moreover, LA-conjugated NPs (CA-PLGA-PEG-LA NPs) enhanced fluorescence of HepG2 cells via ligand-mediated endocytosis. The antitumor effects of 5 F-loaded NPs were evaluated by the MTT assay in vitro and by a xenograft tumor model in vivo, demonstrating that targeted 5 F-loaded CA-PLGA-PEG-LA NPs were significantly superior to free 5 F and 5 F-loaded CA-PLGA-PEG NPs. All the results indicated the 5 F-loaded CA-PLGA-PEG-LA NPs can be employed as a novel potentially targeting drug delivery system for liver cancer therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobionic acid; cancer nanotechnology; nanomedicine; star-shaped copolymer; targeting drug delivery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31195837 PMCID: PMC6586121 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2019.1625467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Figure 1.The synthesis and characterizations of 5 F-loaded CA-PLGA-PEG-LA NPs. (a) Schematic illustration of synthesis procedure of the NPs. (b) DLS size distribution of the NPs. (c) TEM imagine of the NPs.
Figure 2.Stability of 5 F-loaded NPs in vitro. (a) Particle size and (b) zeta potential of 5 F-loaded CA-PLGA, CA-PLGA-PEG and CA-PLGA-PEG-LA NPs during 90 days of storage, respectively.
Figure 3.The in vitro drug release behavior of 5 F-loaded CA-PLGA, CA-PLGA-PEG and CA-PLGA-PEG NPs. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD) for n = 3.
Figure 4.Cellular uptake assay of coumarin-6 loaded NPs. (a) After HepG2 cells were incubated with coumarin-6 loaded NPs for 2 h and then stained by DAPI, the fluorescent images were observed using confocal microscope. Scale bar: 50 μm. (b) Flow cytometry histogram profiles of C6-loaded NPs on HepG2 cells.
Figure 5.Cell viability of HepG2 treated with drug-free CA-PLGA-PEG-LA NPs, 5 F and 5 F-loaded NPs, respectively. (a) 24 h, (b) 48 h and (c) 72 h. The dosage of 5 F is same in the same group. The amount of drug-free CA-PLGA-PEG-LA NPs was the same as that of the NPs. *p < .05 and #p < .01 indicate significant difference compared with 5 F-loaded CA-PLGA-PEG-LA NPs.
Figure 6.(a) Mean tumor volumes and (b) body weights of the mice in different groups after treatment at different time intervals (n = 5). Tail intravenous injection into the HepG2 tumor-bearing mice every 4 days; (c) Representative tissue sections of mice in different groups stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) after 14 days of treatment (Magnification 100×).