Hyuck Soo Shin1, Jae Hee Lee2, Eo Jin Kim3, Min Gyu Kyung4, Hyo Jeong Yoo5, Dong Yeon Lee6. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: hugs1@naver.com. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ljaeh84@hanmail.net. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanil General Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jean2can@hanmail.net. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: mgkyung@naver.com. 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: pthyo88@gmail.com. 6. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: leedy@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Flatfoot deformity is thought to affect gait kinematics, but the effect of flatfoot on segmental motion of the foot during gait remains unclear. Recently, multi-segmental foot models (MFMs) have been introduced for the in vivo analysis of dynamic foot kinematics. The objective of this study was to find the effect of flatfoot on segmental motion of the foot during gait in females by comparisons with age and gender controlled healthy adults. METHODS: Thirty six symptomatic flatfeet patients (52-80 years old) and 42 symptom-free female participants without flatfoot (60-69 years old) were included in this study. According to the Meary angle (MA) on standing lateral radiograph, flatfoot patients are divided into severe (SFF, MA>20°) and moderate (MFF, 10°<MA<20°) flatfoot group. Segmental foot kinematics were evaluated using a 3D MFM of a 15-marker set (DuPont Foot Model). RESULTS: The cadence, speed, stride length, and step width are significantly lower in flatfoot patients. ROM of sagittal and transverse plane of the hindfoot, transverse plane of the forefoot and sagittal plane of the hallux were lower in severe flatfoot group. In the SFF group, there was loss of hindfoot adduction motion during the terminal stance and pre-swing phase. In forefoot kinematics, the SFF group showed significantly supinated and abducted position throughout the gait cycle. In hindfoot kinematics, plantar flexion motion in the pre-swing phase was significantly lower in flatfoot patients in proportion to the severity of the deformity. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that flatfoot deformity affected the kinematics of the foot and ankle in proportion to the severity of deformity. We cautiously suggest that there might be a threshold of flatfoot precluding normal foot kinematics because normal kinematic pattern of the foot might not collapse in moderate flatfoot with a Meary angle of less than 20 degrees.
BACKGROUND:Flatfoot deformity is thought to affect gait kinematics, but the effect of flatfoot on segmental motion of the foot during gait remains unclear. Recently, multi-segmental foot models (MFMs) have been introduced for the in vivo analysis of dynamic foot kinematics. The objective of this study was to find the effect of flatfoot on segmental motion of the foot during gait in females by comparisons with age and gender controlled healthy adults. METHODS: Thirty six symptomatic flatfeet patients (52-80 years old) and 42 symptom-free female participants without flatfoot (60-69 years old) were included in this study. According to the Meary angle (MA) on standing lateral radiograph, flatfoot patients are divided into severe (SFF, MA>20°) and moderate (MFF, 10°<MA<20°) flatfoot group. Segmental foot kinematics were evaluated using a 3D MFM of a 15-marker set (DuPont Foot Model). RESULTS: The cadence, speed, stride length, and step width are significantly lower in flatfoot patients. ROM of sagittal and transverse plane of the hindfoot, transverse plane of the forefoot and sagittal plane of the hallux were lower in severe flatfoot group. In the SFF group, there was loss of hindfoot adduction motion during the terminal stance and pre-swing phase. In forefoot kinematics, the SFF group showed significantly supinated and abducted position throughout the gait cycle. In hindfoot kinematics, plantar flexion motion in the pre-swing phase was significantly lower in flatfoot patients in proportion to the severity of the deformity. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that flatfoot deformity affected the kinematics of the foot and ankle in proportion to the severity of deformity. We cautiously suggest that there might be a threshold of flatfoot precluding normal foot kinematics because normal kinematic pattern of the foot might not collapse in moderate flatfoot with a Meary angle of less than 20 degrees.
Authors: Min Gyu Kyung; Ppu Ri Bak; Jong Wook Lim; Dong-Oh Lee; Gil Young Park; Dong Yeon Lee Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2022-10-15 Impact factor: 3.050