Literature DB >> 31195029

A phylogenetic test of the role of CRISPR-Cas in limiting plasmid acquisition and prophage integration in bacteria.

Derek O'Meara1, Leonard Nunney2.   

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas is a prokaryotic defense system capable of protecting the cell from damaging foreign genetic elements. However, some genetic elements can be beneficial, which suggests the hypothesis that bacteria with CRISPR-Cas incur a cost of reduced intake of mutualistic plasmids and prophage. Here we present the first robust test of this hypothesis that controls for phylogenic and ecological biases in the distribution of CRISPR-Cas. We filtered the available genomic data (~7000 strains from ~2100 species) by first selecting all pairs of conspecific strains, one with and one without CRISPR-Cas (controlling ecological bias), and second by retaining only one such pair per bacterial family (controlling phylogenetic bias), resulting in pairs representing 38 bacterial families. Analysis of these pairs of bacterial strains showed that on average the CRISPR-Cas strain of each pair contained significantly fewer plasmids than its CRISPR-Cas negative partner (0.86 vs. 1.86). It also showed that the CRISPR-Cas positive strains had 31% fewer intact prophage (1.17 vs. 1.75), but the effect was highly variable and not significant. These results support the hypothesis that CRISPR-Cas reduces the rate of plasmid-mediated HGT and, given the abundant evidence of beneficial genes carried by plasmids, provide a clear example of a cost associated with the CRISPR-Cas system.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31195029     DOI: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2019.102418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plasmid        ISSN: 0147-619X            Impact factor:   3.466


  7 in total

1.  CRISPR-Cas is associated with fewer antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pursey; Tatiana Dimitriu; Fernanda L Paganelli; Edze R Westra; Stineke van Houte
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Evolutionary Ecology and Interplay of Prokaryotic Innate and Adaptive Immune Systems.

Authors:  Tatiana Dimitriu; Mark D Szczelkun; Edze R Westra
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  CRISPR-Cas systems restrict horizontal gene transfer in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Rachel M Wheatley; R Craig MacLean
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Broadscale phage therapy is unlikely to select for widespread evolution of bacterial resistance to virus infection.

Authors:  Frederick M Cohan; Matthew Zandi; Paul E Turner
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 5.  CRISPR/Cas12a-based technology: A powerful tool for biosensing in food safety.

Authors:  Zefeng Mao; Ruipeng Chen; Xiaojuan Wang; Zixuan Zhou; Yuan Peng; Shuang Li; Dianpeng Han; Sen Li; Yu Wang; Tie Han; Jun Liang; Shuyue Ren; Zhixian Gao
Journal:  Trends Food Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.563

6.  In silico analysis reveals the co-existence of CRISPR-Cas type I-F1 and type I-F2 systems and its association with restricted phage invasion in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Gulshan Yadav; Ruchi Singh
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 7.  It is unclear how important CRISPR-Cas systems are for protecting natural populations of bacteria against infections by mobile genetic elements.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.