| Literature DB >> 31194806 |
Jiaping Zhang1, Dong Zhang1, Jianfen Wei2, Xiaohua Shi3, Huaqiao Ding3, Shuai Qiu2, Juan Guo2, Danqin Li1, Kaiyuan Zhu3, David P Horvath4, Yiping Xia1.
Abstract
Expanding the southern range of herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) is a meaningful and worthwhile horticultural endeavor in the Northern Hemisphere. However, high temperatures in winter seriously hinder the bud dormancy release and flowering of peony in the more southern areas of subtropical and tropical regions. Resource introduction and hybridization can contribute to creating new cultivars with high adaptability in a warmer winter climate. In this study, three representative cultivars of P. lactiflora were screened for flowering capabilities and their annual growth cycles were observed to provide information needed for hybridization. Among these three cultivars, 'Hang Baishao' is the best adapted cultivar for southern growing regions and is unique in its ability to thrive in southern areas of N 30°00'. Pollen viability of 'Hang Baishao' was 55.60% based on five measuring methods, which makes it an excellent male parent in hybridization. Hybrid plants among these three cultivars grew well, but all of their flower buds aborted. Additionally, the ability of three growth regulators that advance the flowering of 'Hang Baishao' to promote an indoor cultivation strategy for improving peony application as a potted or cut-flower plant was tested. 5-azacytidine could impact the growth of 'Hang Baishao' and induce dwarfism and small flowers but not advance the flowering time. Gibberellin A3 promoted the sprouting and growth significantly, but all plants eventually withered. Chilling at 0-4°C for four weeks and irrigation with 300 mg/L humic acid was the optimal combination used to hasten flowering and ensure flowering quality simultaneously. These results can lay the foundation for future studies on the chilling requirement trait, bud dormancy release and key functional gene exploration of herbaceous peony. Additionally, this study can also provide guidance for expanding the range of economically important plants with the winter dormancy trait to the low-latitude regions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31194806 PMCID: PMC6564672 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Planting and ornamental value of P. lactiflora ‘Hang Baishao’, which is the southernmost cultivated herbaceous peony in eastern China.
(A)—(B): landscapes with plants in full bloom; (C): bright purple-red tender buds and stems; (D)—(E): tender and mature leaves; (F): mature stems; (G) charming red mature follicles.
Fig 2Research motivation, framework and final purpose of this study.
Main information of three representative cultivars with typical early, intermediate and late sprouting and flowering.
| Cultivar name | Provenance | Longitude and latitude | Flower form | Ploidy | Flowering |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hang Baishao | Jinhua, Zhejiang Province | E 120°17’-120°47’, N 28°49’-29°19’ | Single form | Diploid | Early |
| Jinzan Ciyu | Heze, Shandong Province | E 114°48’ -116°24’, N 34°39’ -35°52’ | Anemone form | Intermediate | |
| Taohua Feixue | Crown form | Late |
Fig 3Flowers and comparison of the annual growth cycles among three cultivars.
Components and pollen germination rates observed three hours after inoculation in different culture media.
| Number | Culture medium | Pollen germination rate(%) | Pollen submergence time after inoculation (h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sucrose 100 g/L+ Boric acid 20 mg/L+ Agar powder 5 g/L | 57.57 ± 0.56 b | 2.46 ± 0.05 b |
| 2 | Sucrose 100 g/L+ Boric acid 20 mg/L+ Agar powder 8 g/L | 63.30 ± 0.77 a | 4.03 ±0.04 a |
| 3 | Sucrose 100 g/L+ Boric acid 20 mg/L+ Agar powder 8 g/L + CaCl2 25 mg/L | 21.06± 0.46 c | |
| 4 | Sucrose 100 g/L+ Boric acid 20 mg/L+ Agar powder 10 g/L | 62.57 ± 0.24 a | 4.08 ± 0.05 a |
The symbols of a, b, c and d in this table indicate the statistical significance of the differences, which are the same meaning with those in the subsequent partial tables and “S# Tables” of this article.
Details of 20 treatments for the forcing culture of ‘Hang Baishao’ under naturally low temperature, 5-azacytidine and/or GA3.
| Treatment detail | Nov. 26, 2012 | Dec. 24, 2012 | Jan. 21, 2013 | Feb. 25, 2013 | Always outdoor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Only NLT | T. | T. 2–1 | T. 3–1 | T. 4–1 | T. 5–1 |
| NLT+5-azac | T. 1–2 | T. 2–2 | T. 3–2 | T. 4–2 | T. 5–2 |
| NLT+GA3 | T. 1–3 | T. 2–3 | T. 3–3 | T. 4–3 | T. 5–3 |
| NLT+5-azac+GA3 | T. 1–4 | T. 2–4 | T. 3–4 | T. 4–4 | T. 5–4 |
The date of transferring into glasshouse.
Number of hours when the treatment temperatures were between 0.0 to 7.2°C in this transfer-date, i.e. chilling hours, which can reflect the chilling accumulation of the treated plants, and had already been elaborated and analyzed in previous publication[1]
NLT: natural low temperature.
T.: treatment.
5-azac: 5-azacytidine.
Detail of 24 treatments for the forcing culture of ‘Hang Baishao’ under artificial low temperature and HA treatment.
| Treatment detail | Nov. 29, 2013 | Dec. 6, 2013 (168 h) | Dec. 13, 2013 (336 h) | Dec. 20, 2013 (504 h) | Dec. 27, 2013 (672 h) | Jan. 3, 2014 (840 h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Only ALT | T. 6–1 | T. 7–1 | T. 8–1 | T. 9–1 | T. 10–1 | T. 11–1 |
| ALT + 300 mg/L HA | T. 6–2 | T. 7–2 | T. 8–2 | T. 9–2 | T. 10–2 | T. 11–2 |
| ALT + 600 mg/L HA | T. 6–3 | T. 7–3 | T. 8–3 | T. 9–3 | T. 10–3 | T. 11–3 |
| ALT + 900 mg/L HA | T. 6–4 | T. 7–4 | T. 8–4 | T. 9–4 | T. 10–4 | T. 11–4 |
The date of transferring into glasshouse.
Chilling hour, which has been interpreted in the table footnotes of Table 3.
ALT: artificial low temperature.
HA: humic acid.
Fig 4Observation and comparison of the growth performance of three cultivars over six years.
The error bars represent the standard deviation, and significance levels are 0.05 in all figures and tables of this study. ‘Hang Baishao’ crowns were introduced and planted in autumn of 2012 for the first time, so all the data related to ‘Hang Baishao’ were recorded from 2013 onward. These will not be repeated in the footnotes of the following figures and tables.
Fig 5Observation and comparison of the flowering performance of three cultivars over six years.
Differences were compared among different years for each cultivar in Fig 5A, 5B and 5C and compared among different cultivars for each index in Fig 5D. Values represent the averages from three replicates ± standard deviation.
Fig 6Observation of pollen germination of ‘Hang Baishao’ with the extension of culture duration.
(A): comparison of pollen germination rates between media 2 and 3 (Table 2); (B) germination and tube elongation of pollens cultured on medium 2 (Table 2, no CaCl2) for 1.0 h; (C): 3.0 h; (D): 5.0 h; (E): 6.0 h.
Pollen viabilities of ‘Hang Baishao’ based on the different methods.
| GS method | TTC method | IKS method | ACS method | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pollen viability (%) | 63.30±0.77 a | 46.32±2.42 d | 53.85±2.12 c | 58.91±1.09 b |
ZThe meanings of symbols a, b, c and d in this table are the same with those in Table 2.
Fig 7Observation of pollen germination based on different staining methods.
(A): germination method using liquid culture medium without black background; (B): germination method using liquid culture medium with black background; (C): the TTC staining method; (D): the ACS method; (E) the IKS staining method.
Fig 8The important seasonal phases of hybridization and cultivation from 2013 to 2017.
(A) significantly different sizes between hybrid (left) and self-pollinated (right) follicles in May 2013; (B): hybrid seeds collected in July 2013; (C): rooting of hybrid seeds in November 2013; (D): germination of hybrid seedlings in February to March 2014; (E): one-year-old seedlings grew well in May 2014; (F): tender crowns emerged in September 2014; (G): two-year-old hybrid seedlings grew vigorously in May 2015 (H): flower buds emerged after four years but were all aborted in April 2017.
Statistics of the hybridization among the three cultivars from 2013 to 2016.
| MP | MP: Hang Baishao; | MP: Hang Baishao; FP: Taohua Feixue | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed bearing years | 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 | 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 | 2014, 2016 |
| Seed number per follicle | 3.95±0.27 b | 5.80±0.27 a | 0.35±0.14 c |
| Average weight of one seed (g) | 0.32±0.01 a | 0.34±0.02 a | 0.13±0.07 b |
| Seed diameter paralleled with ventral suture (mm) | 8.30±0.09 c | 9.55±0.21 b | 10.63±0.37 a |
| Seed diameter vertical with ventral suture (mm) | 6.40±0.14 b | 6.34±0.09 b | 7.01±0.13 a |
| Seed germination rate (%) | 92.00±4.47 a | 53.00±8.37 b | 10.00±22.36 c |
| Plant height of one-year seedling (cm) | 7.70±0.08 | 7.83±0.20 | 8.60±0.00 |
| Plant height of two-year seedling (cm) | 27.68±0.63 | 29.65±0.85 | 32.40±0.00 |
| Years needed for generating flower buds | 3.00±0.00 | 3.00±0.00 | — |
| Plant height in the year that generated flower buds (cm) | 45.01±1.52 | 47.45±1.12 | — |
| Percentage of aborted flower (%) | 6.00±5.48 | 100.00±0.00 | — |
MP: male parent
FP: female parent
XThe meanings of symbols a, b, c and d in this table are the same with those in Table 2
We only acquired one F1 seedling of the combination between ‘Hang Baishao’ and ‘Taohua Feixue’, so we could not obtain the significance of difference for the last five indices of this table.
Fig 9Sprouting and growth of potted ‘Hang Baishao’ plants in Experiment I.
(A): natural low temperature + 5-azacytidine; (B): natural low temperature + GA3; (C): natural low temperature + 5-azacytidine + GA3.
Observation of the bud break and growth of ‘Hang Baishao’ after transfer into a glasshouse with natural chilling and 5-azacytidine treatments.
| Treatment | DFS | DEA | ANS | APH | APW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. 1–2 | 40.00 ± 2.00 a | 87.67 ± 3.21 a | 3.14 ± 0.29 b | 27.29 ± 0.46 c | 25.23 ± 0.58 c |
| T. 2–2 | 24.33 ± 2.08 b | 41.00 ± 1.00 b | 3.00 ± 0.14 b | 51.31 ± 0.94 a | 40.32 ± 1.36 a |
| T. 3–2 | 11.00 ± 1.00 c | 18.33 ± 0.58 c | 2.95 ± 0.16 b | 50.68 ± 1.66 a | 35.27 ± 1.78 b |
| T. 4–2 | — | 10.00 ± 2.00 d | 3.29 ± 0.29 ab | 41.64 ± 2.71 b | 35.77 ± 1.74 b |
| T. 5–2 | — | — | 3.62 ± 0.22 a | 43.72 ± 2.05 b | 38.02 ± 1.66 ab |
DFS: average number of Days between the transfer-date and date of the First plant Sprouting in greenhouse
DEA: average number of Days between the transfer-date and date of stem Elongated visibly for All plants
ANS: Average Number of mature and normal Stems per plant during the full flowering period in the year 2013
APH: Average Plant Height per plant during the full flowering period
APW: Average Plant Width per plant during the full flowering period
The data of T. 1–1, T. 2–1, T. 3–1, T. 4–1 and T. 5–1 are no longer listed in Tables 7 and 8[1]. The reason has been elaborated in the footnotes 3 of S1 and S2 Tables.
The symbols of a, b, c and d in this table indicate the statistical significancess of the differences. For the Tables 7 to 10 and S1, S2, S3 and S4 Tables associated with the forcing culture, significances of differences were all compared within each one column of this table, and standard deviations were added after average values (significance levels = 0.05)
The first bud sprouting and stem elongation of T. 4–2 were visible before those being transferred into glasshouse, so the relevant data are inexistent
The plants of T. 5–2 were not transferred into glasshouse, so values of DFS and DEA are also inexistent, and values of other T. 5–2 indices in Tables 7 and 8 were observed outside of the glasshouse.
Fig 10Sprouting, growth and flowering of potted ‘Hang Baishao’ in glasshouse.
(A)-(B): the plants of ‘Hang Baishao’ accepted short chilling duration and painted by 5-azacytidine, then they were partially dwarfed and generated small and abnormal flowers; (C)-(D): immediate sprouting and early-visible flower buds of the “T. *-3” and “T. *-4” plants that were irrigated by GA3; (E): fallen and withered plants of “T. *-3” and “T. *-4”; (F): the flowering landscape of ‘Hang Baishao’ treated by HA and artificial chilling in the group “T. 10-*” in mid-February; (G): highly ornamental properties of one potted plant in mid-February in the subgroup “T. 10–2” treated by four weeks of chilling and 300 mg/L HA, which had clear commercial value as potted or cut-flower for the market of the Chinese Spring or Lantern Festival.
Flowering performance of ‘Hang Baishao’ after transfer to a glasshouse with natural chilling and/or 5-azacytidine treatments.
| Treatment | BDF | NPO | ANO | ANA | AOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. 1–2 | Apr. 08 | 1.00 ± 0.00 c | 0.09 ± 0.08 c | 0.19 ± 0.09 c | 7.50 ± 0.71 ab |
| T. 2–2 | Mar. 06 | 3.00 ± 0.00 b | 0.86 ± 0.15 b | 0.29 ± 0.00 bc | 8.09 ± 0.47 a |
| T. 3–2 | Mar. 26 | 6.33 ± 0.58 a | 3.19 ± 0.09 a | 0.48 ± 0.08 b | 7.93 ± 0.27 a |
| T. 4–2 | Apr. 18 | 7.00 ± 0.00 a | 3.19 ± 0.17 a | 1.14 ± 0.25 a | 6.85 ± 0.06 bc |
| T. 5–2 | Apr. 19 | 6.67 ± 0.58 a | 3.33 ± 0.17 a | 1.09 ± 0.08 a | 6.27 ± 0.20 c |
BDF: the Beginning Date of the first Flower opening
NPO: average Number of Plants with Opening flower per replicate
ANO: Average Number of Opening flowers per plant (NOF/7)
ANA: Average Number of Aborted flowers per plant (NAF/7)
AOD: Average Opening Days per flower
UThe meanings of symbols a, b and c in this Table have been described in the footnote of Table 7.
Flowering performance of ‘Hang Baishao’ after transfer to a glasshouse with artificial chilling and HA treatments.
| Treatment | BDF | NPO | ANO | ANA | AOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. 6–2 | - | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 h | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | - |
| T. 6–3 | -U | 0.00 ± 0.00 g | 0.00 ± 0.00 h | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | - |
| T. 6–4 | Feb. 15 | 0.67 ± 0.58 fg | 0.22 ± 0.19 h | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | 6.00 ± 0.00 e |
| T. 7–2 | Feb. 6 | 1.67 ± 0.58 cde | 1.11 ± 0.38 efg | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | 9.50 ± 2.22 bc |
| T. 7–3 | Feb. 6 | 2.00 ± 0.00 bcd | 1.45 ± 0.39 defg | 0.22 ± 0.39 ab | 8.04 ± 0.56 cd |
| T. 7–4 | Feb. 5 | 1.67 ± 0.58 cde | 0.89 ± 0.19 g | 0.11 ± 0.19 ab | 11.17 ± 1.26 ab |
| T. 8–2 | Feb. 1 | 1.33 ± 0.58 def | 1.11 ± 0.19 efg | 0.11 ± 0.19 ab | 7.00 ± 0.33 de |
| T. 8–3 | Jan. 29 | 2.33 ± 0.58 abc | 1.67 ± 0.34 cdef | 0.22 ± 0.39 ab | 7.13 ± 1.80 de |
| T. 8–4 | Jan. 29 | 1.67 ± 0.58 cde | 1.67 ± 0.34 cdef | 0.00 ± 0.00 b | 7.33 ± 0.58 de |
| T. 9–2 | Feb. 5 | 2.00 ± 0.00 bcd | 2.22 ± 0.19 c | 0.11 ± 0.19 ab | 12.03 ± 0.65 a |
| T. 9–3 | Feb. 5 | 2.00 ± 1.00 bcd | 1.55 ± 0.39 cdefg | 0.33 ± 0.34 ab | 8.31 ± 0.34 cd |
| T. 9–4 | Feb. 8 | 2.33 ± 0.58 abc | 1.78 ± 0.39 cde | 0.56 ± 0.20 a | 7.92 ± 0.58 cd |
| T. 10–2 | Feb. 16 | 3.00 ± 0.00 a | 4.44 ± 0.20 a | 0.11 ± 0.19 ab | 10.57 ± 0.62 ab |
| T. 10–3 | Feb. 19 | 2.67 ± 0.58 ab | 3.56 ± 0.51 b | 0.22 ± 0.19 ab | 9.61 ± 0.54 bc |
| T. 10–4 | Feb. 18 | 1.00 ± 0.00 ef | 1.89 ± 0.19 cd | 0.22 ± 0.19 ab | 9.69 ± 0.30 bc |
| T. 11–2 | Feb. 28 | 1.67 ± 0.58 cde | 1.22 ± 0.19 defg | 0.44 ± 0.20 ab | 8.64 ± 1.44 cd |
| T. 11–3 | Feb. 27 | 3.00 ± 0.00 a | 1.78 ± 0.19 cde | 0.33 ± 0.34 ab | 7.98 ± 0.31 cd |
| T. 11–4 | Feb. 28 | 0.67 ± 0.58 fg | 1.00 ± 1.00 fg | 0.56 ± 0.51 a | 8.00 ± 0.47 cd |
BDF: the Beginning Date of the first Flower opening
NPO: Average Number of Plants per replicate with Opening flower
ANO: Average Number of Opening flowers per plant
ANA: Average Number of Aborted flowers per plant
AOD: Average Opening Days per flower
All plants of the Tre. 6–2 and 6–3 never bloomed or have aborted flower, so the partial data were unable to be collected
TThe meanings of symbols a, b and c etc. in this Table have been described in the footnote of Table 7.
Bud break and plant growth of ‘Hang Baishao’ after transfer to a glasshouse with artificial chilling and HA treatments.
| Treat-ment | DFS | ANS | ADS | APH | APW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. 6–2 | 28.67 ± 1.15 b | 1.00 ± 0.00 i | 2.64 ± 0.72 e | 18.40 ± 6.38 e | 16.37 ± 6.61 f |
| T. 6–3 | 28.67 ± 0.58 b | 1.33 ± 0.29 i | 3.25 ± 0.37 de | 16.60 ± 7.27 e | 13.80 ± 6.39 f |
| T. 6–4 | 33.00 ± 1.00 a | 1.33 ± 0.34 i | 3.32 ± 1.49 cde | 26.98 ± 5.72 d | 24.97 ± 3.57 e |
| T. 7–2 | 21.67 ± 1.15 d | 3.67 ± 0.88 efg | 3.35 ± 0.39 cde | 31.11 ± 3.76 cd | 34.13 ± 1.39 d |
| T. 7–3 | 25.00 ± 0.00 c | 3.05 ± 0.48 gh | 3.93 ± 0.31 abcd | 32.32 ± 9.13 cd | 27.94 ± 5.50 e |
| T. 7–4 | 21.67 ± 0.58 d | 2.67 ± 0.34 h | 3.83 ± 0.84 abcd | 30.84 ± 4.52 cd | 35.30 ± 3.16 cd |
| T. 8–2 | 14.00 ± 0.00 f | 4.00 ± 0.88 def | 3.56 ± 0.39 bcde | 34.66 ± 1.32 bcd | 36.51 ± 3.08 bcd |
| T. 8–3 | 14.67 ± 0.58 f | 3.34 ± 0.58 fgh | 4.79 ± 0.21 a | 39.60 ± 3.13 abc | 35.87 ± 2.86 cd |
| T. 8–4 | 14.00 ± 0.00 f | 4.89 ± 0.70 bcd | 4.30 ± 0.57 abcd | 36.40 ± 2.76 bc | 36.67 ± 1.12 bcd |
| T. 9–2 | 11.67 ± 1.15 g | 4.56 ± 0.20 cde | 4.41 ± 0.37 abc | 41.43 ± 5.70 ab | 35.41 ± 1.48 cd |
| T. 9–3 | 18.00 ± 0.00 e | 5.00 ± 0.33 bc | 4.49 ± 0.47 ab | 41.41 ± 4.52 ab | 36.24 ± 5.07 bcd |
| T. 9–4 | 14.67 ± 0.58 f | 6.34 ± 0.58 a | 4.23 ± 0.08 abcd | 34.55 ± 3.05 bcd | 40.10 ± 1.06 abcd |
| T. 10–2 | 11.33 ± 0.58 g | 4.22 ± 0.51 cdef | 4.89 ± 0.67 a | 47.40 ± 5.59 a | 45.04 ± 0.91 a |
| T. 10–3 | 11.33 ± 0.58 g | 5.56 ± 0.51 ab | 4.53 ± 0.30 ab | 42.47 ± 4.25 ab | 41.60 ± 0.46 abc |
| T. 10–4 | 11.00 ± 0.00 g | 4.55 ± 0.39 cde | 3.95 ± 0.16 abcd | 34.47 ± 0.26 bcd | 37.54 ± 4.15 bcd |
| T. 11–2 | 14.00 ± 0.00 f | 5.78 ± 0.51 ab | 4.37 ± 0.49 abc | 37.76 ± 1.03 bc | 38.76 ± 3.35 abcd |
| T. 11–3 | 14.67 ± 0.58 f | 5.11 ± 0.38 bc | 4.40 ± 0.31 abc | 39.50 ± 1.32 abc | 40.23 ± 1.82 abcd |
| T. 11–4 | 14.00 ± 0.00 f | 5.11 ± 0.19 bc | 4.26 ± 0.20 abcd | 36.59 ± 2.17 bc | 42.98 ± 3.57 ab |
DFS: average number of Days per replicate between the transfer-date and date of the First plant Sprouting
ANS: Average Number of mature and normal Stems per plant during the full flowering period
ADS: Average Diameter of mature and normal Stems per plant during the full flowering period
APH: Average Plant Height per plant during the full flowering period
APW: Average Plant Width per plant during the full flowering period
The data of T. 6–1, T. 7–1, T. 8–1, T. 9–1, T. 10–1 and T. 11–1 are no longer listed in Tables 9 and 10[1]. The reason has been elaborated in the footnotes 3 of S3 and S4 Tables
TThe meanings of symbols a, b and c etc. in this Table have been described in the footnote of Table 7.
Fig 11The main results and logistical relationships among different parts of this study.