Literature DB >> 31194246

Performance of a Deep-Learning Algorithm vs Manual Grading for Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy in India.

Varun Gulshan1, Renu P Rajan2, Kasumi Widner1, Derek Wu1, Peter Wubbels3, Tyler Rhodes4, Kira Whitehouse3, Marc Coram1, Greg Corrado1, Kim Ramasamy2, Rajiv Raman4, Lily Peng1, Dale R Webster1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: More than 60 million people in India have diabetes and are at risk for diabetic retinopathy (DR), a vision-threatening disease. Automated interpretation of retinal fundus photographs can help support and scale a robust screening program to detect DR.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively validate the performance of an automated DR system across 2 sites in India. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective observational study was conducted at 2 eye care centers in India (Aravind Eye Hospital and Sankara Nethralaya) and included 3049 patients with diabetes. Data collection and patient enrollment took place between April 2016 and July 2016 at Aravind and May 2016 and April 2017 at Sankara Nethralaya. The model was trained and fixed in March 2016.
INTERVENTIONS: Automated DR grading system compared with manual grading by 1 trained grader and 1 retina specialist from each site. Adjudication by a panel of 3 retinal specialists served as the reference standard in the cases of disagreement. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity for moderate or worse DR or referable diabetic macula edema.
RESULTS: Of 3049 patients, 1091 (35.8%) were women and the mean (SD) age for patients at Aravind and Sankara Nethralaya was 56.6 (9.0) years and 56.0 (10.0) years, respectively. For moderate or worse DR, the sensitivity and specificity for manual grading by individual nonadjudicator graders ranged from 73.4% to 89.8% and from 83.5% to 98.7%, respectively. The automated DR system's performance was equal to or exceeded manual grading, with an 88.9% sensitivity (95% CI, 85.8-91.5), 92.2% specificity (95% CI, 90.3-93.8), and an area under the curve of 0.963 on the data set from Aravind Eye Hospital and 92.1% sensitivity (95% CI, 90.1-93.8), 95.2% specificity (95% CI, 94.2-96.1), and an area under the curve of 0.980 on the data set from Sankara Nethralaya. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study shows that the automated DR system generalizes to this population of Indian patients in a prospective setting and demonstrates the feasibility of using an automated DR grading system to expand screening programs.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31194246      PMCID: PMC6567842          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  39 in total

1.  Introducing automated diabetic retinopathy systems: it's not just about sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  Caroline Jane Styles
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Great expectations and challenges of artificial intelligence in the screening of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Mingwei Zhao; Yuzhen Jiang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Intraoperative brain tumour identification with deep learning.

Authors:  Michael L Martini; Eric K Oermann
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Validation of diagnostic accuracy of retinal image grading by trained non-ophthalmologist grader for detecting diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Sanil Joseph; Renu P Rajan; Balagiri Sundar; Soundarya Venkatachalam; John H Kempen; Ramasamy Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  PADAr: physician-oriented artificial intelligence-facilitating diagnosis aid for retinal diseases.

Authors:  Po-Kang Lin; Yu-Hsien Chiu; Chiu-Jung Huang; Chien-Yao Wang; Mei-Lien Pan; Da-Wei Wang; Hong-Yuan Mark Liao; Yong-Sheng Chen; Chieh-Hsiung Kuan; Shih-Yen Lin; Li-Fen Chen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-07-25

6.  The Validation of Deep Learning-Based Grading Model for Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Wen-Fei Zhang; Dong-Hong Li; Qi-Jie Wei; Da-Yong Ding; Li-Hui Meng; Yue-Lin Wang; Xin-Yu Zhao; You-Xin Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-16

7.  A deep learning system for identifying lattice degeneration and retinal breaks using ultra-widefield fundus images.

Authors:  Zhongwen Li; Chong Guo; Danyao Nie; Duoru Lin; Yi Zhu; Chuan Chen; Li Zhang; Fabao Xu; Chenjin Jin; Xiayin Zhang; Hui Xiao; Kai Zhang; Lanqin Zhao; Shanshan Yu; Guoming Zhang; Jiantao Wang; Haotian Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

8.  Generalisability through local validation: overcoming barriers due to data disparity in healthcare.

Authors:  William Greig Mitchell; Edward Christopher Dee; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 9.  Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema pathways and management: UK Consensus Working Group.

Authors:  Winfried M Amoaku; Faruque Ghanchi; Clare Bailey; Sanjiv Banerjee; Somnath Banerjee; Louise Downey; Richard Gale; Robin Hamilton; Kamlesh Khunti; Esther Posner; Fahd Quhill; Stephen Robinson; Roopa Setty; Dawn Sim; Deepali Varma; Hemal Mehta
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Deep learning-based automated detection for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in retinal fundus photographs.

Authors:  Feng Li; Yuguang Wang; Tianyi Xu; Lin Dong; Lei Yan; Minshan Jiang; Xuedian Zhang; Hong Jiang; Zhizheng Wu; Haidong Zou
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.456

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.