| Literature DB >> 31194133 |
Abstract
The theme of the present communication is to explore the novel analysis of entropy generation optimization, binary chemical reaction and activation energy for nonlinear convective flow of Sisko model on a radially stretchable rotating disk in the presence of a uniform vertical magnetic field. Nonlinear mixed convection, nonlinear thermal radiation, MHD, viscous dissipation, Joule heating and non-uniform heat generation/absorption are also considered. Nanofluid model includes significant slip mechanism of Brownian motion and thermophoresis. Apposite transformations are endorsed to get the nonlinear coupled ODEs system. The resultant system of ordinary differential equations is endeavoured for series solutions through homotopic technique. Total entropy generation is inspected through numerous emerging flow variables. Comparative study is made for temperature, velocity, heat transfer rate, Bejan number, entropy generation and mass transfer Nusselt number by considering shear thickening and thinning fluids. Finally, a comparison is specified with the previous existing results.Entities:
Keywords: Activation energy; Entropy generation; Non-linear mixed convection; Non-linear thermal radiation; Non-uniform heat source/sink; Rotating stretchable disk; Sisko nano-fluid model
Year: 2019 PMID: 31194133 PMCID: PMC6551480 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01863
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Physical model.
Fig. 2h
Convergence of HAM solutions when.
| Order of approx. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | −1.0138 | −0.4375 | −0.3165 | −1.0819 | −0.7398 |
| 10 | −1.2344 | −0.4262 | −0.2964 | −1.0778 | −0.7374 |
| 20 | −1.4362 | −0.3963 | −0.2801 | −1.0645 | −0.7360 |
| 25 | −1.5360 | −0.3963 | −0.2855 | −1.0582 | −0.7357 |
| 30 | −1.5360 | −0.3963 | −0.2885 | −1.0457 | −0.7352 |
| 36 | −1.5360 | −0.3963 | −0.2885 | −1.0430 | −0.7352 |
| 50 | −1.5360 | −0.3963 | −0.2885 | −1.0430 | −0.7352 |
Numerical values of when
| Bs | Pr | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 0.6 | n = 1.8 | ||||||
| 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.9245 | 2.0124 |
| 1.0 | 1.9819 | 2.0959 | |||||
| 1.5 | 2.0485 | 2.1905 | |||||
| 0.2 | 1.9245 | 2.0124 | |||||
| 0.4 | 1.8931 | 1.9728 | |||||
| 0.6 | 1.8362 | 1.9423 | |||||
| 7.2 | 1.8733 | 1.9478 | |||||
| 1.2 | 1.9245 | 2.0124 | |||||
| 2.5 | 2.0318 | 2.1247 | |||||
| 0.2 | 1.7991 | 1.8645 | |||||
| 0.4 | 1.8847 | 1.9638 | |||||
| 0.6 | 1.9245 | 2.0124 | |||||
| 0.1 | 1.9247 | 2.0127 | |||||
| 0.3 | 1.9245 | 2.0124 | |||||
| 0.5 | 1.9241 | 2.0120 | |||||
| 0.3 | 1.9245 | 2.0124 | |||||
| 0.5 | 1.8905 | 1.9767 | |||||
| 0.7 | 1.8147 | 1.9054 | |||||
Numerical values of when
| Bs | Pr | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 0.6 | n = 1.8 | ||||||
| 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.9179 | 2.0480 |
| 1.0 | 1.9448 | 2.0811 | |||||
| 1.5 | 1.9760 | 2.1217 | |||||
| 0.2 | 1.9179 | 2.0480 | |||||
| 0.4 | 1.9565 | 2.0926 | |||||
| 0.6 | 1.9957 | 2.1743 | |||||
| 7.2 | 1.9578 | 2.0915 | |||||
| 1.2 | 1.9179 | 2.0480 | |||||
| 2.5 | 1.8653 | 2.0075 | |||||
| 0.2 | 1.8466 | 2.0098 | |||||
| 0.4 | 1.8834 | 2.0161 | |||||
| 0.6 | 1.9179 | 2.0480 | |||||
| 0.1 | 1.8904 | 2.0217 | |||||
| 0.3 | 1.9179 | 2.0480 | |||||
| 0.5 | 1.9450 | 2.0740 | |||||
| 0.3 | 1.9179 | 2.0480 | |||||
| 0.5 | 1.8834 | 2.0276 | |||||
| 0.7 | 1.8802 | 2.0061 | |||||
Comparison of and with [49] and [50] when
| Present (HAM) | Ref. | Ref. | Present (HAM) | Ref. | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.501 | 0.677 | 0.677 | 0.676 |
| 0.8 | 0.504 | 0.504 | 0.504 | 0.635 | 0.636 | 0.636 |
| 1.0 | 0.511 | 0.510 | 0.510 | 0.616 | 0.616 | 0.616 |
| 1.8 | 0.529 | 0.529 | 0.529 | 0.601 | 0.601 | 0.601 |
Fig. 3and against
Fig. 4and against
Fig. 5and against
Fig. 6against and
Fig. 7against and
Fig. 8against and
Fig. 9against and
Fig. 10against
Fig. 12and against
Fig. 13and against
Fig. 14and against
Fig. 15and against
Fig. 11and against
Fig. 16and against
Fig. 17with
Fig. 18with
Fig. 19with