Literature DB >> 31194130

Dietary Fiber Intake, Myocardial Injury, and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Angela Yee-Moon Wang1, Mandy Man-Mei Sea1,2, Kenway Ng1,2, Mei Wang1, Iris Hiu-Shuen Chan3, Christopher Wai-Kei Lam3, John E Sanderson1, Jean Woo1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dialysis patients are frequently advised to restrict fruit and vegetable intake due to their high potassium content. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dietary fiber intake and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among dialysis patients.
METHODS: A total of 219 prevalent dialysis patients were prospectively recruited from a major university teaching hospital and regional dialysis center in Hong Kong. Dietary fiber intake estimated using a 7-day locally validated food frequency questionnaire was examined in relation to a primary composite outcome of MACE over a follow-up period of 4 years.
RESULTS: A total of 127 patients were complicated with 1 or more MACE. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, every 1 g higher fiber intake, and every 1 g/d per 1000 kcal higher fiber intake density were associated with an 11% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.97) and a 13% lower risk of MACE (95% CI: 0.77-0.99), respectively, independent of clinical, demographic, biochemical, hemodynamic, adequacy parameters, dietary protein, energy intake, inflammatory, and cardiac markers. Patients in the lower tertile of fiber intake density showed an increased hazard for MACE (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.13-2.80) than those in the upper tertile.
CONCLUSION: Higher fiber intake and higher fiber intake density may be associated with less inflammation, less myocardial hypertrophy, injury, and lower risk of MACE in dialysis patients. These data form an important basis for a randomized controlled trial to examine fiber supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes in the dialysis population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dialysis; fiber intake; major adverse cardiovascular events

Year:  2019        PMID: 31194130      PMCID: PMC6551507          DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int Rep        ISSN: 2468-0249


Diet has long been implicated in playing an important etiologic role in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in the general population.1, 2 Numerous epidemiologic studies in the general population have reported a strong, inverse relationship between dietary fiber intake and risk of coronary heart disease, with higher fiber intake associated with a 20% to 40% risk reduction in coronary disease.3, 4, 5, 6 Recent data from US general population cohorts showed that increased fiber intake from pre– to post–myocardial infarction was significantly associated with a 31% lower risk of all-cause mortality. Dietary fiber intake may modify cardio-metabolic risk profile by delaying absorption of carbohydrates, increasing satiety, and ameliorating postprandial hyperglycemia, enhancing peripheral insulin sensitivity, and lowering low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol.8, 9, 10 However, the importance of fiber intake among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is underrecognized. Patients with advanced CKD are frequently advised to restrict intake of fruits, green leafy vegetables, and whole-grain cereals due to their high potassium content, and risk of hyperkalemia and hyperphosphatemia, respectively. Fiber intake in patients with advanced CKD is therefore generally reduced compared with that of the general population. Recent data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey suggested that the relationship between total fiber intake with inflammation and mortality appeared much stronger in those with kidney disease than those without kidney disease, providing preliminary evidence that more emphasis should perhaps be placed on encouraging intake of this specific component, “fiber,” in the diet of patients with CKD. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between dietary fiber intake and risk of MACE in a prospective dialysis cohort. We also tested the associations, if any, between fiber intake and various inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers.

Concise Methods

Study Design and Study Participants

We performed a prospective longitudinal cohort study in 219 patients with CKD stage 5D, age between 18 and 75 years, who had received chronic dialysis treatment for at least 3 months from a total peritoneal dialysis population of 240 in a single regional dialysis center and a major university hospital in Hong Kong from 1999 to 2001. Twenty-one patients were excluded based on the exclusion criteria, which included patients with ongoing systemic inflammatory disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, patients with underlying malignancies, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or active tuberculous infection still undergoing treatment, as these conditions may influence dietary intake. Approval was obtained from the institutional research ethics committee of the university to conduct this study. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before participating in the study. At study baseline, all eligible patients underwent dietary assessment, echocardiographic examination, clinical assessment, blood taking for various biochemical analyses, and assessment of dialysis adequacy. In hospitalized patients, all the assessments, including dietary assessment, were deferred for at least 1 month after complete resolution of the acute complication.

Dietary Assessment

All patients underwent a 7-day food frequency questionnaire that has been validated in our local Chinese population to estimate average daily energy, protein, and total fiber intake. In brief, the questionnaire consisted of 253 food items in the following 7 categories: bread/pasta/rice (16 items), vegetables (63 items), fruits (26 items), meat (39 items)/fish (31 items)/eggs (5 items), beverages (37 items), dimsum/snacks (39 items), soups (10 items), and oil/salt/sauces. Items chosen were those most frequently consumed, based on previous local surveys, and overlapped with some items of the questionnaire used in the Australian Chinese Dietary Survey. Wherever possible, individuals were told before the visit that a survey on a week’s diet would be carried out and were advised to record at home to help the interview. On the day of the interview, individuals were asked to complete the questionnaire by recording their diet for the week preceding the interview as follows: the food item, the size of the portion, and the number of times of consumption each day and each week. Portion size was explained to individuals with the aid of photographs to illustrate individual food portion size, using bowls with a volume of 240 ml and plates 17.5-cm in diameter. Nutrient quantity was calculated using food tables from McCance and Widdowson (Holland et al.) and 2 Chinese food tables16, 17 in which validation had been carried out using chemical analysis. Data were cross-checked by examining the dietary pattern (for example, if meals were skipped) to see if it corresponded to the number of times staple foods such as rice or noodles were consumed over the 1-week period. The dietary questionnaire we used in this study has been validated in the Chinese population and the validity of the nutrient quantitation was examined by comparing calculated 24-hour intake of total energy, sodium, and potassium, with estimated value of energy expenditure (basal metabolic rate × 1.4) and 24-hour urinary sodium and potassium outputs. All the food frequency questionnaires were administered by a group of trained research assistants with experience in performing dietary interviews and blinded to clinical and biochemical details of all subjects. Data from the food frequency questionnaire were input into computer format and analyzed. Dietary energy, protein, and total fiber intake were normalized to patients’ actual dry weight and fiber intake density was daily fiber intake normalized per 1000-kcal energy intake.

Echocardiographic Examination

Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed using a GE-VingMed System 5 echocardiographic machine (GE-VingMed Sound AB, Horten, Norway) with a 3.3-mHz multiphase array probe in subjects lying in the left decubitus position by a single experienced cardiologist blinded to all clinical, biochemical, and dietary details of patients. All echocardiographic data were analyzed according to the guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography. Ejection fraction was obtained using a modified biplane Simpson’s method from apical 2- and 4-chamber views.

Biochemical Analysis

Fasting venous blood samples were collected for measurement of blood hemoglobin, serum urea, creatinine, calcium, phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), albumin, cholesterol, triglyceride, fetuin-A, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), and cardiac troponin. Intact parathyroid hormone was measured by Immulite 1000 Analyzer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL). hs-CRP was measured using the Tina-quant C-reactive protein latex ultra-sensitive assay. Albumin was measured using the bromcresol purple method, and total cholesterol and triglyceride were measured by the Hitachi 911 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was measured by the precipitation of Apo B containing lipoproteins with phosphotungstate, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Serum fetuin-A was determined using a human fetuin-A enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Epitope Diagnostics, San Diego, CA). NT-pro-BNP and cardiac troponin T were quantified by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on the Elecsys 2010 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN).

Indices of Dialysis Adequacy

Twenty-four–hour urine and dialysate were collected for measurement of total, peritoneal dialysis, and residual kidney clearance of urea and creatinine using standard method. Glomerular filtration rate was calculated as an average of 24-hour urinary urea and creatinine clearance.

Clinical Data Collection

A thorough medical history was taken at the time of study entry to obtain clinical and demographic data, including diabetes, smoking status, details of any previous history of angina, myocardial infarction with or without percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting, heart failure, previous stroke or transient ischemic attacks, intermittent claudication or other symptoms suggestive of peripheral vascular disease with or without history of amputation or revascularization, and use of different antihypertensive medications. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured on every follow-up visit at 8-week intervals for 1 year preceding study baseline and were averaged to give the final reading.

Follow-up and Outcome Measures

All patients were prospectively followed up for 4 years from the day of baseline assessments at study entry or until death. No patient was lost to follow-up. The primary outcome examined was first MACE, which was defined a priori and the cohort was purposely assembled to examine this outcome. MACE included angina with electrocardiographically documented changes of myocardial ischemia, acute myocardial infarction, electrocardiographically documented arrhythmia, heart failure, or thromboembolic or hemorrhagic stroke, all of which were defined according to standard clinical criteria, peripheral vascular disease, or sudden cardiac death. Peripheral vascular disease was defined as the presence of intermittent claudication with angiographic or sonographic detection of ≥50% stenosis of the major arteries of the lower limb, with or without revascularization procedures, ischemic leg ulceration, gangrene with or without amputation, and aortic aneurysm. Sudden cardiac death was defined as unexpected natural death within 1 hour from the symptom onset and without any prior condition that would appear fatal.22, 23 The nature of the first MACE was provided by the attending physician and this information was retrieved from the computerized Clinical Management System of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority and the Renal Registry Database that keep detailed records of all hospitalization episodes and causes of death. In case of death out of hospital, family members were interviewed by telephone to ascertain the circumstances surrounding death. For patients who had multiple MACEs, survival analysis was limited to the first event.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range) depending on the distribution. Patients were stratified into tertiles according to daily dietary fiber intake and fiber intake densities. Between-group comparisons were done using 1-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous data depending on data distribution and χ2 test for categorical data. Survival curves were generated by means of Kaplan-Meier estimates, and differences in MACE-free survival were compared by the log-rank test. In this analysis, patients who underwent kidney transplantation or were permanently transferred to hemodialysis were censored at the time of transfer to alternative renal replacement therapy. If a patient died within 3 months of transfer to hemodialysis, then he or she was not censored, as the MACE was considered to reflect the health status during the period of failing peritoneal dialysis treatment. To examine the effects of fiber intake and fiber intake density in predicting the first MACE, univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted using covariates with P < 0.1 in the univariate analysis. Age and gender were included in the multivariable Cox regression models irrespective of their statistical significance. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows Software (IBM Corp, Chicago, IL). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics. The average daily fiber intake was 5.0 ± 2.5 g/d and was higher in men than women (5.5 ± 2.6 vs 4.4 ± 2.3 g/d; P = 0.001). However, fiber intake density did not differ between men and women (3.7 ± 1.4 and 3.5 ± 1.5g/1000 kcal/d; P = 0.5). We stratified patients by tertiles of fiber intake. Table 2 compared the characteristics of patients across tertiles of fiber intake density.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics in relation to tertile stratification of dietary fiber intakea

VariablesTotal (n = 219)Dietary fiber intake stratified in tertiles
P for trend
Upper (n = 73)Middle (n = 73)Lower (n = 73)
Clinical and demographic
 Age (yr)556 ± 1253 ± 1356 ± 1158 ± 100.009
 Men, n (%)109 (49.5)45 (61.6)35 (47.9)29 (39.7)0.3
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)66 (30)22 (30.1)19 (26.0)25 (34.2)0.6
 Positive smoking history, n (%)54 (24.5)25 (34.2)13 (17.8)15 (20.5)0.5
 Body mass index (kg/m2)23.0 ± 3.423.1 ± 4.023.0 ± 3.023.0 ± 3.20.9
 Duration of dialysis (mo)b26.5 (15, 51)24 (12, 37.5)26 (16.5, 57.5)39 (16, 61.5)0.1
 Systolic BP (mm Hg)147 ± 17.2144 ± 16148 ± 18148 ± 170.1
 Diastolic BP (mm Hg)82 ± 983 ± 1082 ± 982 ±100.6
 Pulse pressure (mm Hg)64 ± 1461 ± 1266 ± 1466 ± 150.02
 Hypertension, n (%)189 (85.9)61 (83.6)63 (86.3)64 (87.7)0.5
 Background AVD, n (%)52 (23.6)19 (26.0)12 (16.4)21 (28.8)0.7
 Coronary artery disease, n (%)44 (20)16 (21.9)11 (15.1)17 (23.3)0.8
Echocardiographic
 LV mass index (g/m2)224 ± 85207 ± 69217 ± 81247 ± 990.004
 LV volume index (ml/m2)66 ± 2067 ± 2263 ± 1867 ± 210.2
 LV ejection fraction (%)53 ± 852 ± 1053 ± 852 ± 80.2
Dialysis
 Total weekly urea clearance1.81 ± 0.441.76 ± 0.461.87 ± 0.491.80 ± 0.360.6
 PD urea clearance1.53 ± 0.351.4 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.3<0.001
 Renal urea clearance0.28 ± 0.410.38 ± 0.420.29 ± 0.500.16 ± 0.260.001
 Total weekly CrCl (l/wk per 1.73 m2)56.3 ± 21.661.1 ± 26.756.6 ± 22.951.2 ± 11.00.005
 PD CrCl (l/wk per 1.73 m2)39.8 ± 8.1636.1 ± 7.2140.3 ± 8.0342.8 ± 7.74<0.001
 Renal CrCl (l/wk per 1.73 m2)16.5 ± 23.125.1 ± 27.916.3 ± 23.68.39 ± 12.2<0.001
 Normalized PCR (g/kg per d)b0.94 (0.82, 1.08)0.99 (0.85, 1.10)0.94 (0.86, 1.09)0.88 (0.78, 1.03)0.03
 % with RRF134 (60.9)57 (78.1)44 (60.3)32 (43.8)<0.001
 Residual GFR (ml/min/1.73m2)b0.55 (0.00, 1.89)0.92 (0.17, 2.75)0.44 (0.0, 1.76)0.00 (0.00, 1.06)<0.001
Biochemical
 Hemoglobin (g/dl)9.18 ± 1.719.77 ± 2.018.92 ± 1.368.85 ± 1.540.001
 Serum albumin (g/dl)28.6 ± 5.229.7 ± 5.628.3 ± 5.427.7 ± 4.30.02
 Serum potassium (mmol/l)4.01 ± 0.624.16 ± 0.594.07 ± 0.623.80 ± 0.580.001
 Plasma calcium (mmol/l)2.56 ± 0.232.55 ± 0.222.55 ± 0.252.57 ± 0.210.7
 Plasma phosphate (mmol/l)1,67 ± 0.461.71 ± 0.501.69 ± 0.431.61 ± 0.470.2
 Intact PTH (pmol/l)b42.4 (18.7, 74.1)40.6 (18.9, 67.7)36.3 (16.7, 64.7)48.9 (19.9, 82.9)0.2
 Total cholesterol (mmol/l)5.39 ± 1.195.32 ± 1.075.60 ± 1.275.25 ± 1.220.06
 HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)1.24 ± 0.421.19 ± 0.351.27 ± 0.481.25 ± 0.430.4
 LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)2.18 ± 0.983.33 ± 0.903.41 ± 0.983.09 ± 1.050.2
 Triglyceride (mmol/l)2.08 ± 1.481.87 ± 0.992.24 ± 1.902.14 ± 1.400.3
 Hs-CRP (mg/l)b2.90 (0.90, 0.98)1.39 (0.77, 5.43)3.0 (0.95, 8.08)4.28 (1.25, 11.4)0.006
 Interleukin-6 (pg/ml)b9.7 (5.2, 18.1)6.9 (4.5, 14.6)10.7 (5.4, 18.6)10.3 (7.0, 18.800.05
 Fetuin-A (g/l)0.31 ± 0.070.32 ± 0.070.31 ± 0.060.29 ± 0.060.003
 Cardiac troponin T (μg/l)b0.06 (0.01, 0.15)0.03 (0.01, 0.09)0.03 (0.01, 0.15)0.1 (0.02, 0.18)0.002
 NT-pro-BNP (pg/ml)b5842 (1950, 17,533)3730 (1631, 13,304)4798 (1717, 13,872)9366 (2640, 35,000)0.02
Dietary intake
 Total fiber intake (g/d)5.0 ± 2.57.7 ± 2.04.8 ± 0.72.5 ± 0.8<0.001
 Energy intake (kcal/kg per day)24.6 ± 8.829.9 ± 8.824.5 ± 7.319.6 ± 6.9<0.001
 Protein intake (g/kg per day)1.1 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.51.1 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.4<0.001

AVD, atherosclerotic vascular disease; BP, blood pressure; CrCl, creatinine clearance; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; hs-CRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LV, left ventricular; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PCR, protein catabolic rate; PD, peritoneal dialysis; PTH, parathyroid hormone; RRF, residual renal function.

Dietary fiber intake >5.88 g/d as upper tertile (reference group), 3.71 g to 5.88 g/d as middle tertile, and <3.71 g/d as lower tertile.

Continuous data are expressed as mean ± SD unless specified otherwise.

Median (interquartile range).

Table 2

Baseline characteristics in relation to tertile stratification of fiber intake densitya

VariablesFiber intake density stratified by tertile
P for trend
Upper (n = 73)Middle (n = 73)Lowest (n = 73)
Clinical and demographic
 Age (yr)54.4 ± 12.055.4 ± 11.956.8 ± 11.10.5
 Men, n (%)36 (51.4)38 (50.7)35 (47.3)0.9
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)22 (31.4)26 (34.7)18 (24.3)0.4
 Positive smoking history, n (%)18 (25.7)19 (25.3)16 (21.6)0.9
 Body mass index (kg/m2)23.6 ± 4.0522.5 ± 2.8723.1 ± 3.170.1
 Duration of dialysis (mo)b24 (13, 27)25 (13, 50)39 (19, 60)0.03
 Systolic BP (mm Hg)144 ± 16149 ± 18146 ± 170.3
 Diastolic BP (mm Hg)81 ± 1084 ± 1081 ± 90.1
 Pulse pressure (mm Hg)63 ± 1365 ± 1465 ± 140.7
 Hypertension, n (%)56 (80)66 (88)66 (89.2)0.2
 Background AVD, n (%)18 (25.7)19 (25.3)15 (20.3)0.7
 Coronary artery disease, n (%)17 (24.3)15 (20)12 (16.2)0.5
Echocardiographic
 LV mass index (g/m2)218 ± 75.6202 ± 74251 ± 97.60.002
 LV volume index (ml/m2)63.3 ± 19.465.4 ± 20.668.4 ± 21.30.3
 LV ejection fraction (%)52.5 ± 8.952.2 ± 8.3852.4 ± 7.591.0
Dialysis
 Total weekly urea clearance1.74 ± 0.391.86 ± 0.401.83 ± 0.500.2
 PD urea clearance1.46 ± 0.341.55 ± 0.361.57 ± 0.350.1
 Renal urea clearance0.28 ± 0.380.31 ± 0.350.25 ± 0.490.4
 Total weekly CrCl (l/wk per 1.73 m2)57.8 ± 25.757.6 ± 19.553.5 ± 19.30.4
 PD CrCl (l/wk per 1.73 m2)38.5 ± 7.1838.9 ± 8.5141.7 ± 8.300.04
 Renal CrCl (l/wk per 1.73 m2)19.3 ± 27.118.7 ± 20.411.9 ± 21.30.1
 Normalized PCR (g/kg per day)b0.91 (0.81, 1.08)0.96 (0.87, 1.07)0.93 (0.79, 1.09)0.5
 % with RRF44 (62.9)55 (73.3)34 (45.9)0.04
 Residual GFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2)b0.91 (0.81, 1.08)0.96 (0.87, 1.07)0.93 (0.79, 1.09)0.01
Biochemical
 Hemoglobin (g/dl)9.45 ± 1.909.20 ± 1.588.92 ± 1.620.2
 Serum albumin (g/dl)28.7 ± 5.1029.1 ± 5.8127.9 ± 4.460.4
 Plasma potassium (mmol/l)4.15 ± 0.604.06 ± 0.613.82 ± 0.590.004
 Plasma calcium (mmol/l)2.56 ± 0.232.52 ± 0.202.60 ± 0.240.08
 Plasma phosphate (mmol/l)1.73 ± 0.531.61 ± 0.391.69 ± 0.460.3
 Intact PTH (pmol/l)b42.8 (18.6, 62.8)33.6 (13.1, 61.2)50.7 (20.5, 53.9)0.6
 Total cholesterol (mmol/l)5.53 ± 1.225.30 ± 1.160.36 ± .1.210.5
 HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)1.16 ± 0.351.25 ± 0.471.30 ± 0.430.2
 LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)3.50 ± 0.963.17 ± 0.943.17 ± 1.030.08
 Triglyceride (mmol/l)2.13 ± 1.742.10 ± 1.462.03 ± 1.220.9
 hs-CRP (mg/l)b1.99 (0.78, 7.91)1.75 (0.80, 5.71)3.86 (1.24, 11.2)0.09
 Interleukin-6 (pg/ml)b8.05 (4.05, 18.15)9.30 (5.30, 15.90)10.2 (6.80, 19.20)0.1
 Fetuin-A (g/l)0.32 ± 0.060.31 ± 0.060.30 ± 0.080.6
 Troponin (μg/l)b0.03 (0.01, 0.14)0.03 (0.01, 0.12)0.08 (0.03, 0.17)0.01
 NT-pro-BNP (pg/ml)b4455 (1722, 18,249)5156 (2165, 13,395)7973 (1894, 28,291)0.3
Dietary intake
 Fiber intake (g/d)6.94 ± 2.535.02 ± 1.763.05 ± 1.48<0.001
 Fiber intake density (g/d per 1000 kcal energy intake)5.27 ± 1.073.46 ± 0.382.14 ± 0.55<0.001
 Energy intake (kcal/kg per day)22.9 ± 7.4626.5 ± 9.5424.4 ± 8.830.05
 Protein intake (g/kg per day)1.07 ± 0.411.16 ± 0.491.08 ± 0.440.4

BP, blood pressure; CrCl, creatinine clearance; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; hs-CRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LV, left ventricular; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PCR, protein catabolic rate; PD, peritoneal dialysis; PTH, parathyroid hormone; RRF, residual renal function.

Fiber intake density defined as daily fiber intake adjusted per 1000 kcal energy intake.

Fiber intake density >4.10 g/d per 1000 kcal energy intake as upper tertile (reference group), 2.90 to 4.10 and <2.90 g/d per 1000 kcal energy intake as middle and lower tertiles, respectively.

Continuous data are expressed as mean ± SD unless specified otherwise.

Median (interquartile range).

Baseline characteristics in relation to tertile stratification of dietary fiber intakea AVD, atherosclerotic vascular disease; BP, blood pressure; CrCl, creatinine clearance; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; hs-CRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LV, left ventricular; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PCR, protein catabolic rate; PD, peritoneal dialysis; PTH, parathyroid hormone; RRF, residual renal function. Dietary fiber intake >5.88 g/d as upper tertile (reference group), 3.71 g to 5.88 g/d as middle tertile, and <3.71 g/d as lower tertile. Continuous data are expressed as mean ± SD unless specified otherwise. Median (interquartile range). Baseline characteristics in relation to tertile stratification of fiber intake densitya BP, blood pressure; CrCl, creatinine clearance; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; hs-CRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LV, left ventricular; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PCR, protein catabolic rate; PD, peritoneal dialysis; PTH, parathyroid hormone; RRF, residual renal function. Fiber intake density defined as daily fiber intake adjusted per 1000 kcal energy intake. Fiber intake density >4.10 g/d per 1000 kcal energy intake as upper tertile (reference group), 2.90 to 4.10 and <2.90 g/d per 1000 kcal energy intake as middle and lower tertiles, respectively. Continuous data are expressed as mean ± SD unless specified otherwise. Median (interquartile range). During the median follow-up of 17.7 (interquartile range, 6.0–47.2) months, 127 patients (58%) experienced 1 or more MACE. The nature of first MACE included acute coronary syndrome or acute myocardial infarction in 15 patients (6.8%), ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular event in 16 patients (7.3%), heart failure in 76 patients (34.7%), peripheral vascular disease in 5 patients (2.3%), electrocardiographically confirmed arrhythmia in 8 patients (3.7%), and sudden cardiac death in 7 patients (3.2%). Supplementary Table S1 shows the univariate Cox regression analysis in relation to first MACE. Fiber intake (hazard ratio: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78–0.92; P < 0.001) and fiber intake density (hazard ratio: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74–0.97; P = 0.02) were associated with the development of first MACE. Compared with patients in the upper tertile of fiber intake density, those in the lower tertile were at 1.68-fold (95% CI: 1.09–2.58; P = 0.02) increase in the risk of developing first MACE. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis controlling for clinical, biochemical, dialysis, echocardiographic parameters, and cardiac biomarkers, fiber intake was significantly associated with first MACE. Every 1 g/d increase in fiber intake was associated with an 11% reduction (95% CI: 0.81–0.97) in the risk of developing MACE (Table 3). Its significance outweighed other cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes, background atherosclerotic vascular disease, left ventricular mass index, pulse pressure, serum albumin, hs-CRP, and residual glomerular filtration rate and was independent of protein and energy intake. Figure 1a shows the Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative MACE-free survival probabilities in relation to tertiles of fiber intake. Patients in the lower tertile had the lowest cumulative MACE-free survival probability among the 3 groups (P = 0.005).
Table 3

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of dietary fiber intake in relation to first major adverse cardiovascular event

VariablesUnit increaseHazard ratio (95% confidence intervals)P
Dietary fiber intake (g/d)1 g/d0.89 (0.81–0.97)0.008
Serum albumin (g/dl)1 g/dl0.94 (0.89–0.98)0.005
Diabetes mellitusYes1.79 (1.19–2.70)0.005
Pulse pressure (mm Hg)1 mm Hg1.02 (1.01–1.03)0.007
Background AVDYes1.73 (1.16–2.58)0.007
Duration of dialysis (mo)1 mo0.99 (0.99–1.00)0.04
Serum fetuin-A (μg/l)1 μg/l12.9 (0.64–261.6)0.09
Cardiac troponin T (μg/l)1 μg/l2.60 (1.14–5.93)0.02
NT-pro-BNP (pg/ml)1 pg/ml1.00 (1.00–1.00)<0.001
Left ventricular mass index (g/m2)1 g/m21.00 (1.00–1.01)0.06

AVD, atherosclerotic vascular disease; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide.

Out of the model including age, gender, residual glomerular filtration rate, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, daily energy intake, and protein intake and hemoglobin.

Figure 1

Cumulative major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival probabilities in relation to (a) dietary fiber intake stratified by tertiles and (b) fiber intake density stratified by tertiles. Dietary fiber intake >5.88 g/d as upper tertile (reference group), 3.71 g to 5.88 g/d as middle tertile, and <3.71 g as lower tertile. Fiber intake density defined as grams of daily fiber intake adjusted per 1000 kcal energy intake. Fiber intake density >4.10 g/d per 1000 kcal energy intake as upper tertile (reference group), 2.90 to 4.10, and <2.90 g/d per 1000 kcal energy intake as middle and lower tertiles, respectively.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of dietary fiber intake in relation to first major adverse cardiovascular event AVD, atherosclerotic vascular disease; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Out of the model including age, gender, residual glomerular filtration rate, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, daily energy intake, and protein intake and hemoglobin. Cumulative major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival probabilities in relation to (a) dietary fiber intake stratified by tertiles and (b) fiber intake density stratified by tertiles. Dietary fiber intake >5.88 g/d as upper tertile (reference group), 3.71 g to 5.88 g/d as middle tertile, and <3.71 g as lower tertile. Fiber intake density defined as grams of daily fiber intake adjusted per 1000 kcal energy intake. Fiber intake density >4.10 g/d per 1000 kcal energy intake as upper tertile (reference group), 2.90 to 4.10, and <2.90 g/d per 1000 kcal energy intake as middle and lower tertiles, respectively. Figure 1b shows the Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative MACE-free survival probabilities in relation to tertiles of fiber intake density. Those in the lower tertile of fiber intake density had the lowest MACE-free survival probabilities over 4 years as compared with those in the upper tertile (P = 0.028). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis considering the same clinical, biochemical, dialysis, echocardiographic parameters, and cardiac biomarkers, fiber intake density was associated with MACE both as a continuous variable (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77–0.99; P = 0.046) and when stratified into tertiles (Table 4). Compared with patients in the upper tertile of fiber intake density, those in the lower tertile showed an increased hazard (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.13–2.80; P = 0.01) for MACE, independent of other cardiovascular risk factors, including diabetes mellitus, background atherosclerotic vascular disease, pulse pressure, serum albumin, hs-CRP, residual glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular mass index, duration of dialysis, cardiac troponin T, and NT-pro-BNP.
Table 4

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of fiber intake density in relation to first major adverse cardiovascular event

VariablesUnit increaseHazard ratio (95% confidence intervals)P
Serum albumin (g/dl)1 g/dl0.94 (0.90–0.98)0.004
Diabetes mellitusYes1.89 (1.26–2.83)0.002
Pulse pressure (mm Hg)1 mm Hg1.02 (1.01–1.04)0.003
Background AVDYes1.77 (1.19–2.54)0.005
Residual GFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2)1 ml/min per 1.73 m20.90 (0.80–1.00)0.06
Duration of dialysis (mo)1 mo0.99 (0.98–0.99)0.02
Cardiac troponin T (μg/l)1 μg/l2.86 (1.23–6.66)0.05
NT-pro-BNP (pg/ml)1 pg/ml1.000 (1.000–1.000)0.003
Left ventricular mass index (g/m2)1 g/m21.0 (1.00–1.01)0.08
Fiber intake density (g/d adjusted per 1000 kcal energy intake)
 vs upper tertile (ref group)Lower tertile1.78 (1.13–2.80)0.01
 vs upper tertile (ref group)Middle tertile1.15 (0.72–1.83)0.6

AVD, atherosclerotic vascular disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.

Fiber intake density defined as daily fiber intake in grams per day adjusted per 1000 kcal energy intake.

Out of the model including age, gender, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fetuin-A, interleukin-6, and hemoglobin.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of fiber intake density in relation to first major adverse cardiovascular event AVD, atherosclerotic vascular disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Fiber intake density defined as daily fiber intake in grams per day adjusted per 1000 kcal energy intake. Out of the model including age, gender, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fetuin-A, interleukin-6, and hemoglobin.

Discussion

In this study, we observed an important relationship between higher fiber intake and higher fiber intake density with a lower risk of MACE in a prospective dialysis cohort being followed for 4 years. Every 1 g higher daily fiber intake was independently associated with an 11% reduction in the risk of MACE. Every 1 g/d per 1000 kcal higher daily fiber intake density was independently associated with a 13% reduction in the adjusted risk of MACE. The magnitude of risk reduction associated with every gram increase of fiber intake and every g/d per 1000 kcal increase of fiber intake density appeared larger than that observed in the general population. Notably, the significance of higher fiber intake in predicting a lower risk of MACE outweighed other traditional and kidney disease–related cardiovascular risk factors or markers such as hypoalbuminemia; arterial stiffening; low fetuin-A; high hs-CRP, cardiac troponin T, and NT-pro-BNP; and left ventricular mass index. This observation is novel and extends the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, showing that a higher dietary fiber intake was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in those with CKD. There was some suggestion that higher dietary fiber intake may also retard kidney function decline, reduce proinflammatory factors and indoxyl sulfate and thus lower cardiovascular risk in advanced CKD. The general health benefits of dietary fiber are well recognized and have been quite extensively studied in the general population. Several general population cohorts showed that higher fiber intake was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease and myocardial infarction.4, 26 In a systematic review of 12 prospective general population cohort studies, every 7 g/d higher fiber intake was associated with a 9% lower risk of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease. Our current observations add to the existing evidence, suggesting that increasing dietary fiber intake may have a similar cardiovascular protective benefit in the dialysis population and warrant further exploration. Several biologically plausible mechanisms may explain the association between higher fiber intake and higher fiber intake density with a lower risk of MACE in dialysis patients. First, high fiber intake favorably modifies the gut microbiota populations, decreases gut dysbiosis, improves the integrity of intestinal barrier, and increases colonization of acetate-producing bacteria or saccharolytic forms of bacteria in the gut, leading to the release of short-chain fatty acids and acetate, into the circulation and reduces the generation of colon-derived uremic toxins including indoxyl sulfate and p-cresol sulfate from the metabolism of tryptophan and tyrosine, respectively.27, 28 Dietary fiber in the form of resistant starch has been shown to increase the ratio of Bacteroides to Firmicutes and reduce the generation of uremic solutes indoxyl sulfate and p-cresol sulfate in adenine-induced CKD rats. In keeping with these experimental data, vegetarians were noted to have at least 50% less production of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresol sulfate than in healthy individuals consuming an unrestricted diet. In a recent small randomized trial of hemodialysis subjects, resistant starch supplementation was associated with reduced plasma levels of colon-derived solutes indoxyl sulfate and possibly p-cresol sulfate compared with control subjects, without the need to intensify dialysis treatments. P-cresol sulfate and indoxyl sulfate have both been related to overall mortality and cardiovascular disease in the CKD and dialysis population.32, 33, 34 In this study, dialysis patients having higher fiber intake and higher fiber intake density were notably associated with less cardiac hypertrophy, lower hs-CRP and cardiac troponin T levels, and a trend toward lower NT-pro-BNP, suggesting a possible link between higher fiber intake with less myocardial injury and inflammation. A recent study from hypertensive mice showed that higher fiber diet and acetate supplementation significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures, cardiac fibrosis, and cardiac hypertrophy. Transcriptome analysis showed that the protective effects of high fiber and acetate were accompanied by downregulation of cardiac and renal Egr1, which is a master cardiovascular regulator involved in cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and inflammation. Although this experimental data may not be directly translatable to the dialysis population, it adds important mechanistic insights on a possible link between higher fiber intake, modulation of gut microbiota, and regulation of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis and lends important support for the novel observations from this study. Reshaping the gut microbiota using dietary fiber may emerge as a novel, potentially therapeutic strategy for cardiovascular disease in CKD and dialysis patients and warrants further investigation. The other biologically plausible mechanism that explains lower MACE risk with higher fiber intake and higher fiber intake density in dialysis patients may relate to the lower inflammatory response associated with higher fiber intake, as supported by the current finding. Several studies in the general population have reported a similar, inverse relationship between higher fiber intake and lower levels of inflammatory markers such as CRP.36, 37 In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, higher fiber intake was associated with lower inflammatory response and more so in those with CKD. Every 10 g/d increase in total fiber intake was associated with an 11% and 38% decrease in the odds of having an elevated CRP in patients without and with kidney disease, respectively. Having an elevated CRP was well recognized to be associated with an increased risk of mortality and cardiovascular death in the dialysis population. Contrary to data from the general population suggesting that increasing fiber intake may lower the risk of cardiovascular disease by improving cholesterol levels, this seems not to be the case in our dialysis patients, as we did not find any significant relations between fiber intake quantities and serum lipid profile. The recommended daily dietary fiber intake of the general population is 25 g for adult women and 30 g for men by the American Dietetic Association, and 30 g by the Australia and New Zealand National Medical Research Council and British Nutrition Foundation. However, no recommendation has been specifically drawn for the CKD and dialysis population. In this study, the average daily fiber intake of our dialysis patients was only 5 g, which was alarmingly low. This finding may, however, not be surprising, as our patients are very often educated to restrict their intake of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains because of potassium and phosphate concerns. Further study is needed to define the recommended fiber intake in the CKD and dialysis population and whether the type of fiber may differ in terms of their effects on cardiovascular outcomes in this population. Our study has several important strengths. First, it was prospectively designed with comprehensive clinical, biochemical, echocardiographic, and dialysis data collection; the outcomes were purposely defined a priori; and the study had a rather long follow-up duration with no loss to follow-up. Second, we quantified dietary fiber intake using a locally validated 7-day dietary questionnaire. Nevertheless, several limitations are worth mentioning. First, we were not able to make causal implications based on some of the cross-sectional associations observed and there could be reverse causality. That is, patients who had worse health condition and cardiac status may have poorer appetite and as a consequence, had lower overall intake and also less willing to eat a more diverse diet or a diet with higher fiber content. Second, our questionnaire quantified the total fiber intake without differentiating between soluble and insoluble fiber and without identifying the food source of fiber, that is, whether it is constituted by fruits, vegetables, resistant starch, cereals, or others. This may be important information to know as the effects of different types of fiber may not be the same. Third, dietary recall had the limitation of reporting bias and may under- or overestimate dietary intake and have measurement errors. Fourth, the use of self-report and 1-time assessment of diet could lead to misclassification bias. Because dietary intake and all the other parameters were assessed only once at baseline, we were not able to take into account changes over time. It is possible that patients’ diet at baseline may change during follow-up. Finally, there could be residual confounding not accounted for in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. In conclusion, higher fiber intake and higher fiber intake density were independently associated with a lower risk of MACE in the dialysis population. Our novel findings call on the need for a large randomized trial to further explore this inexpensive but important lifestyle modification strategy for cardiovascular protection in the dialysis population.

Disclosure

All the authors declared no competing interests.
  33 in total

Review 1.  Dietary fibre: a roughage guide.

Authors:  S L James; J G Muir; S L Curtis; P R Gibson
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.048

2.  A prospective study of dietary fiber intake and risk of cardiovascular disease among women.

Authors:  Simin Liu; Julie E Buring; Howard D Sesso; Eric B Rimm; Walter C Willett; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Cereal, fruit, and vegetable fiber intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease in elderly individuals.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Jean L Olson; Gregory L Burke; David S Siscovick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Long-term intake of dietary fiber and decreased risk of coronary heart disease among women.

Authors:  A Wolk; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; F B Hu; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens; W C Willett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Free serum concentrations of the protein-bound retention solute p-cresol predict mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  B Bammens; P Evenepoel; H Keuleers; K Verbeke; Y Vanrenterghem
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Position of the American Dietetic Association: health implications of dietary fiber.

Authors:  Judith A Marlett; Michael I McBurney; Joanne L Slavin
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-07

7.  Dietary fiber and C-reactive protein: findings from national health and nutrition examination survey data.

Authors:  Umed A Ajani; Earl S Ford; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 8.  Optimal diets for prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Frank B Hu; Walter C Willett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Cross-sectional assessment of weekly urea and creatinine clearances in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  K D Nolph; H L Moore; Z J Twardowski; R Khanna; B Prowant; M Meyer; L Ponferrada
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1992 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Is a single time point C-reactive protein predictive of outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients?

Authors:  Angela Yee-Moon Wang; Jean Woo; Christopher Wai-Kei Lam; Mei Wang; Mandy Man-Mei Sea; Siu-Fai Lui; Philip Kam-Tao Li; John Sanderson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 10.121

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association between dietary fiber intake and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in adults: a cross-sectional study of 14,947 population based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.

Authors:  Shutang Zhang; Jie Tian; Min Lei; Canye Zhong; Yan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.135

Review 2.  Protective Role of Polyphenols in Heart Failure: Molecular Targets and Cellular Mechanisms Underlying Their Therapeutic Potential.

Authors:  Rami S Najjar; Rafaela G Feresin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Chronic Kidney Disease, Gut Dysbiosis, and Constipation: A Burdensome Triplet.

Authors:  Ryota Ikee; Naomi Sasaki; Takuji Yasuda; Sawako Fukazawa
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-11-25

4.  Fiber intake and health in people with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Guobin Su; Xindong Qin; Changyuan Yang; Alice Sabatino; Jaimon T Kelly; Carla Maria Avesani; Juan Jesus Carrero
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-09-14

5.  Association Between Dietary Fiber Intake and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Middle Aged and Elderly Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Kwon; Hye Sun Lee; Go Eun Park; Ji-Won Lee
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 6.  Sugar Fructose Triggers Gut Dysbiosis and Metabolic Inflammation with Cardiac Arrhythmogenesis.

Authors:  Wan-Li Cheng; Shao-Jung Li; Ting-I Lee; Ting-Wei Lee; Cheng-Chih Chung; Yu-Hsun Kao; Yi-Jen Chen
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 7.  Dietary Fiber and Gut Microbiota in Renal Diets.

Authors:  Carla Camerotto; Adamasco Cupisti; Claudia D'Alessandro; Fulvio Muzio; Maurizio Gallieni
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Nutritional status, hyperkalaemia and attainment of energy/protein intake targets in haemodialysis patients following plant-based diets: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Ailema González-Ortiz; Hong Xu; Samuel Ramos-Acevedo; Carla M Avesani; Bengt Lindholm; Ricardo Correa-Rotter; Ángeles Espinosa-Cuevas; Juan Jesús Carrero
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.992

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.