| Literature DB >> 31194076 |
Tansukh Barupal1, Mukesh Meena1, Kanika Sharma1.
Abstract
Plants produce a high diversity of natural products with a prominent function in the protection against microbial pathogens on the basis of their toxic effect on growth and reproduction. In the present study, effect of partially purified acetone fraction of L. inermis leaves on various cytomorphological parameters i.e. mycelium width, conidial size, etc. of test fungi and fraction was subjected to confirming the presence of primary and secondary metabolites by rapid qualitative phytochemical tests, chromatographic methods such as TLC, column chromatography, GC-MS, etc. which were responsible for the inhibition of growth of test pathogen conidial size of Curvularia lunata decreased up to 64.76% at 0.039 μg/ml concentration of the extract. Mycelial width of C. lunata increased up to 55.91% at 0.312 μg/ml concentration of the extract. Carbohydrate, steroids, volatile oils, flavonoids, and tannins were found to be present in acetone extract of L. inermis leaf. Total of 7 bands were observed in TLC fingerprinting of L. inermis acetone fraction. Total of 10 fractions were collected from the column chromatography. Fractions which show the most significant antifungal activity against the test fungus was subjected to further GC-MS analysis for the separation and identification of active principle. GC-MS analyses show the presence of total 6 constituents i.e. hexacosane, octadecane, docosane, heptacosane methyl, octacosane, and tetracosane.Entities:
Keywords: Bioformulations; CC, Column chromatography; CD, Critical difference; CV, Coefficient of variation; Chromatography; Curvularia lunata; DAD, Diode array detector; FeCl3, Ferric chloride; GC–MS, Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; H2SO4, Sulfuric acid; HCl, Hydrochloric acid; HPLC, High performance liquid chromatography; Lawsonia inermis; MFC, Minimum fungicidal concentration; MIC, Minimum inhibitory concentration; NaOH, Sodium hydroxide; PDA, Potato dextrose agar; PE, Petroleum ether; PE, petroleum ether; RF, Retardation factor; SE, Standard error; Secondary metabolites; TLC, Thin layer chromatography
Year: 2019 PMID: 31194076 PMCID: PMC6546954 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Effect of different concentrations of acetone extract of Lawsonia inermis leaf on mycelium width of Curvularia lunata.
| S. No. | Extract concentration (mg/ml) | Mycelium width (μm) ± SD | % Increase in mycelium width |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 4.1 ± 0.05 | – |
| 2. | 0.625 | NF | – |
| 3. | 0.312 | 9.3 ± 0.04 | 55.91 |
| 4. | 0.156 | 8.8 ± 0.02 | 53.40 |
| 5. | 0.078 | 8.1 ± 0.05 | 49.38 |
| 6. | 0.039 | 7.7 ± 0.02 | 46.75 |
| 7. | 0.019 | 6.5 ± 0.03 | 36.92 |
| 8. | 0.0097 | 6.2 ± 0.03 | 33.87 |
| 9. | 0.0048 | 5.7 ± 0.05 | 28.07 |
| 10. | 0.0024 | 5.1 ± 0.02 | 19.60 |
NF: Not Found.
Effect of different concentrations of acetone extract of Lawsonia inermis leaf on conidial size of Curvularia lunata.
| S. No. | Extract concentration (mg/ml) | Conidial size (μm) (L × W) | Conidial size (μm) ± SD (Area) | % Reduction in conidial size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Control | 24.16 × 8.1 | 195.69 ± 0.17 | – |
| 2. | 0.625 | CNF | CNF | – |
| 3. | 0.312 | CNF | CNF | – |
| 4. | 0.156 | CNF | CNF | – |
| 5. | 0.078 | CNF | CNF | – |
| 6. | 0.039 | 14.80 × 4.66 | 68.96 ± 0.29 | 64.76 |
| 7. | 0.019 | 15.96 × 4.96 | 79.16 ± 0.19 | 59.54 |
| 8. | 0.0097 | 17.63 × 5.50 | 96.96 ± 0.28 | 50.45 |
| 9. | 0.0048 | 18.50 × 6.06 | 112.11 ± 0.39 | 42.71 |
| 10. | 0.0024 | 21.06 × 7.03 | 148.05 ± 0.18 | 24.34 |
CNF: Conidia Not Formed.
Fig. 1Morphological alterations in Curvularia lunata due to treatment with Acetone extract on different concentrations. (A) Mycelium and conidia of Curvularia lunata (Control at 400X). (B) (1) Normal mycelium (Control at 400X); (2) Mycelium showing increasing width (Control at 400X). (C) (1) Normal mycelium (Control at 400X); (2) Conidia showing a decrease in size (Control at 400X).
Fig. 2(A) Effect of different concentrations of acetone extract of Lawsonia inermis leaf on mycelium width of Curvularia lunata. (B) Effect of different concentrations of acetone extract of L. inermis leaf on conidia size of C. lunata.
Fig. 3Thin layer chromatography (TLC) of various fractions of Lawsonia inermis leaf. (i) TLC of acetone fraction of leaf under visible light; (ii) TLC of acetone fraction of leaf under UV light (Before derivatization); (iii) TLC of acetone fraction of leaf under UV light (After derivatization).
Rf values of TLC fingerprinting of acetone fraction of Lawsonia inermis leaf.
| Band number | Colour of bands | Rf value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before derivatization | After derivatization | ||
| 1. | Green | Blue green | 0.16 |
| 2. | Greenish blue | Dark blue | 0.35 |
| 3. | Yellow | Yellow | 0.52 |
| 4. | Light yellow | Yellow blue | 0.63 |
| 5. | Blue | Purple | 0.70 |
| 6. | Dark blue | Light blue | 0.75 |
| 7. | Yellow | Dark yellow | 0.85 |
Antifungal activity of column fractions (1–10 numbers) of acetone extract of Lawsonia inermis leaf against Curvularia lunata.
| S. No. | Type of extract | Growth diameter after 7 days (mm) | % Mycelial growth inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | F1 | 20.66 ± 0.57 | 75.00 |
| 2. | F2 | 35.00 ± 1.00 | 57.66 |
| 3. | F3 | 35.66 ± 1.15 | 56.86 |
| 4. | F4 | 41.33 ± 1.52 | 50.00 |
| 5. | F5 | 46.33 ± 0.57 | 43.95 |
| 6. | F6 | 30.66 ± 0.57 | 62.91 |
| 7. | F7 | 37.33 ± 1.15 | 54.84 |
| 8. | F8 | 39.33 ± 0.57 | 52.42 |
| 9. | F9 | 43.66 ± 0.57 | 47.18 |
| 10. | F10 | 49.00 ± 1.73 | 40.72 |
| 11. | Control (Water) | 82.67 ± 0.57 | NI |
F: Fraction; NI: No Inhibition.
Fig. 4Phytochemical analysis of extracts. (A) Thin layer chromatographic chamber; (B) Column chromatography; (C) Lawsonia inermis leaf fractions collected from column chromatography; (D) Antifungal activity of column fractions (1–10) of acetone extract of Lawsonia inermis leaf against Curvularia lunata.
Fig. 5(A) Gas Chromatography–Mass spectrometry analysis of Fraction no.1 of acetone fraction of Lawsonia inermis leaf; (B) Mass spectrum of Hexacosane (EINECS 211-124-1); (C) Mass spectrum of Octadecane (Beilstein 1770570); (D) Mass spectrum of Docosane (EINECS 211-121-5); (E) Mass spectrum of Heptacosane methyl (14167-66-9); (F) Mass spectrum of Octacosane (RN 630-02-4); (G) Mass spectrum of Tetracosane (Beilstein 1758462).