| Literature DB >> 31193986 |
B K K K Jinadasa1, G S Chathurika1, G D T M Jayasinghe1, C D Jayaweera2.
Abstract
Mercury (Hg) and cadmium (Cd) are contaminants of great environmental concern due to their natural and anthropogenic origin, their ability of bioaccumulate through the food chain and their harmful effects on human health. In this study, the Hg and Cd accumulation in the muscle of 65 yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) collected from two different catching sites of the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka were evaluated. The samples were mineralized using microwave accelerated digestion, and the metals were detected by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). The metal levels were not significantly different between the two sites (p > 0.05), and the average Hg and Cd concentrations were 0.48 ± 0.35 mg/kg and 0.017 ± 0.024 mg/kg, (wet weight basis) respectively. Only 6 (9.2%) and 2 samples (3.1%) exceeded the European Commission limits for Hg (1 mg/kg) and Cd (0.01 mg/kg), respectively. A comparatively strong positive correlation was observed between the THg concentration and the weight of the fish. However, there was no clear relationship between the concentration and size for Cd. These findings provide an understanding of the Hg and Cd distribution in yellowfin tuna in two fishing grounds in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka.Entities:
Keywords: Cadmium; Catching location; Food contamination; Food safety; Food science; Mercury; Toxicology; Yellowfin tuna
Year: 2019 PMID: 31193986 PMCID: PMC6545362 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Obtained ±SD and certified concentrations (μg/kg, wet weight) in certified quality control materials (CQM).
| CQM | THg | Cd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T/07243 | Certified | 707 (469–946) | 800 (535–1065) |
| Obtained | 722.55 ± 50.58 | 782.40 ± 70.41 | |
| T/07279 | Certified | 106 (59–152) | 7.55 (5.76–9.33) |
| Obtained | 107.48 ± 6.45 | 7.40 ± 0.59 | |
mg/kg, SD – standard deviation.
Fig. 1Locations of sampling; B-Bay of Bengal Sea area, SW-South West Indian Ocean area.
Sample number, weight (kg), length (cm) of YFT and THg (mg/kg) and Cd (mg/kg) on a wet weight basis. The last column shows the results from one-way ANOVA tests on the differences between the fish from the Bay of Bengal and the South West Indian oceans.
| Parameter | Bay of Bengal | SW Indian Ocean | Both areas | Comparison by site ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of samples | 18 | 47 | 65 | |
| Weight (kg) | 50.9 ± 16.5 | 43.9 ± 12.4 | 45.9 ± 13.9 | |
| (32.0–91.6) | (25.5–76.7) | (25.5–91.6) | ||
| Length (cm) | 134 ± 30 | 120 ± 34 | 124 ± 33 | |
| (68–170) | (64–180) | (64–180) | ||
| THg (mg/kg) | 0.49 ± 0.33 | 0.47 ± 0.37 | 0.48 ± 0.35 | |
| (ND-1.35) | (ND-1.60) | (ND-1.60) | ||
| Cd (mg/kg) | 0.012 ± 0.008 | 0.019 ± 0.027 | 0.017 ± 0.024 | |
| (ND-0.033) | (ND-0.134) | (ND-0.134) |
The values are given as the mean ± SD (range), LOQ for Hg; 0.07 and Cd; 0.006 mg/kg, w/w.
Comparison of the mean/range of THg (mg/kg) and sample information for YFT in the present study in comparison to other studies.
| Origin | n | Length or weight | THg range (mg/kg) | THg, mg/kg (Mean ± SD) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic Ocean | 13 | 96–145 cm | 0.166–0.531 | _ | |
| Gulf of California | 15 | 59–136 cm | <DL-0.23 | 0.03 ± 0.06 | |
| Pacific Ocean (Baja California Sur) | 68 | 54.6–94.2 cm | _ | 0.51 ± 0.33 | |
| Pacific Ocean (Equatorial zone) | 200 | 61.4–145.9 cm | _ | 0.98 ± 0.68 | |
| Indian Ocean | 10 | 97.07 ± 2.32 cm | _ | 0.245 ± 0.055 | |
| South Atlantic Ocean | 14 | 29.0–50.8 kg | 0.45–1.52 | 0.77 | |
| western-central Indian Ocean | 5 | 133 ± 13 cm | _ | 0.375 ± 0.166 | |
| Ecuador | 44 | 74–163 cm | 0.005–6.0 | 1.4 ± 1.3 | |
| Indian Ocean | 140 | 64–173 cm | <0.07–0.98 | 0.30 ± 0.18 | |
| Oman | 346 | _ | 0.01–0.570 | 0.0326 ± 0.087 | |
| Italy | 61 | _ | 0.254–0.430 | 0.35 | |
| Indian Ocean (Mozambique Channel) | 20 | 22 kg | _ | 0.13 ± 0.09 | |
| Indian Ocean (Reunion Island) | 19 | 24 kg | _ | 0.21 ± 0.15 | |
| Indian Ocean | 65 | 64–180 cm | <0.07–1.60 | 0.48 ± 0.35 | This study |
| (Bay of Bengal and South West Indian oceans) |
SD – standard deviation.
Fig. 2Relationship between THg (mg/kg) concentration and the weight (kg) of YFT.