Literature DB >> 31193770

Utility of en-face imaging in diagnosis of occult macular dystrophy with RP1L1 mutation: A case series.

Merry Zc Ruan1, S Amal Hussnain1,2,3, Amanda Thomas4, Mahesh Mansukhani4, Stephen Tsang1,4, Lawrence Yannuzzi2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report en-face imaging findings at the level of ellipsoid zone (EZ) in two cases of occult macular dystrophy (OMD) with retinitis pigmentosa 1-like 1 (RP1L1) p.Arg45Trp mutation. OBSERVATIONS: In both patients who presented with decreased vision, pupillary examination, intraocular pressure, and anterior examination were normal. Ophthalmoscopic examination showed prominent choroidal marking whereas fundus autofluorescence was unremarkable. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) showed subtle gaps between EZ and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). The photoreceptor disruption became more evident with en-face imaging at the EZ plane. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: This is a report of two patients with EZ en-face imaging that aided in the diagnosis of OMD where other structural imaging was largely unremarkable. The en-face imaging modality can also be used to monitor OMD progression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ellipsoid zone; En-face imaging; Occult macular dystrophy; RP1L1

Year:  2019        PMID: 31193770      PMCID: PMC6543024          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2019.100465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep        ISSN: 2451-9936


Introduction

Occult macular dystrophy (OMD) is a retinal disease characterized by progressive decline in central visual acuity in the presence of normal fundus, autofluorescence, and angiographic findings. The current gold standard for diagnosis is multi-focal ERG (mfERG) followed by genetic confirmation of hereditary cases. Patients have a reduction of multi-focal ERG (mfERG) amplitude in central areas. Genetics analyses from patients with family history revealed that dominant mutation in Retinitis Pigmentosa 1 Like 1 (RP1L1) gene p.Arg45Trp as the cause. However, sporadic patients usually do not have the same mutations, suggesting other genes may also cause similar symptoms and signs. Even within patients with RP1L1 p.Arg45Trp mutation, the age at which patients report subjective decrease of vision varies widely from 6 to 60 years old. Here, we report en-face imaging of retinitis pigmentosa 1-like 1 (RP1L1) associated OMD that accentuates photoreceptor disruption in OMD and can aid in its diagnosis at initial presentation, thus avoiding unnecessary testing and procedures.

Findings

Two patients with adult-onset occult macular dystrophy were included.

Case 1

A 56-year-old woman with psoriatic arthritis presented with ongoing blurry vision for 4 years. She had undergone bilateral cataract surgery with minimal improvement in her vision at the age of 52. A year after cataract surgery, she was diagnosed with central serous retinopathy (CSR). Given her continued visual symptoms, she underwent an MRI at 54 years old and was found to have a right ophthalmic artery aneurysm that was stented without improvement in vision. On presentation, her best-corrected vision acuity (BCVA) was 20/100 in each eye with normal pupillary exam, intraocular pressures, and color plates in both eyes. Ophthalmoscopic exam showed tilted nerves with prominent choroidal markings (Fig. 1A and B) and fundus autofluorescence was unremarkable (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1

Multimodal Imaging of RP1L1 associated Occult Macular Dystrophy. A: Case 1 fundus photos show tilted nerves and prominent choroidal markings, B: Case 1 wide angle retina photo, C: Case 1 fundus autofluorescence is unremarkable, D: Case 1 SD-OCT of the macula shows a gap between EZ and RPE. E: Case 2 fundus photos show prominent choroidal markings, F: Case 2 fundus autofluorescence shows normal findings, G: Case 2 macula SD-OCT shows a gap between EZ and RPE.

Multimodal Imaging of RP1L1 associated Occult Macular Dystrophy. A: Case 1 fundus photos show tilted nerves and prominent choroidal markings, B: Case 1 wide angle retina photo, C: Case 1 fundus autofluorescence is unremarkable, D: Case 1 SD-OCT of the macula shows a gap between EZ and RPE. E: Case 2 fundus photos show prominent choroidal markings, F: Case 2 fundus autofluorescence shows normal findings, G: Case 2 macula SD-OCT shows a gap between EZ and RPE.

Case 2

A 46-year-old man was referred to the retina clinic for suspected cone dystrophy. Past ocular history was significant for decreased vision for the last 20 years. His parents were second cousins. Family history was significant for cone dystrophy in a cousin. On exam, his BCVA was 20/50 OD and 20/60 OS. Pupillary exam, intraocular pressure, and anterior examination were unremarkable. Full field ERG was also within normal limits. Funduscopic exam showed prominent choroidal markings (Fig. 1E) and autofluorescence (Fig. 1F) were normal. In both cases, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) through the fovea showed gaps between the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) bilaterally (Fig. 1D, G). Although subtle and almost undetectable in certain areas on structural OCT, the photoreceptor disruption in both cases was starkly evident with en-face imaging of the ellipsoid zone (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

En-face Imaging of RP1L1 associated Occult Macular Dystrophy. Case 1 and 2 en face ellipsoid analysis shows photoreceptor disruption with limited SD-OCT findings. Aqua line indicates position of the SD-OCT B-scan.

En-face Imaging of RP1L1 associated Occult Macular Dystrophy. Case 1 and 2 en face ellipsoid analysis shows photoreceptor disruption with limited SD-OCT findings. Aqua line indicates position of the SD-OCT B-scan. Given these findings, OMD was suspected. Whole exome sequencing (WES) revealed heterozygous mutations in RP1L1 (p.Arg45Trp) both cases, which was confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

Discussion

Occult macular dystrophy only affects the macula and is difficult to diagnose with the commonly used imaging methods in ophthalmologic clinic. Multi-focal ERG (mfERG), which is time-consuming and labor intensive, is usually performed after high clinical suspicion for OMD. Typically, OMD patients show central loss of response density and normal periphery in mfERG. Whole exome sequencing is cost-prohibiting and time consuming. Moreover, sporadic OMD patients usually do not have the predictable mutations due to genetic heterogeneity. Even with RP1L1 p.Arg45Trp mutation that is common in familial OMD, the age of onset varies, further increasing the difficulty of diagnosis. SD-OCT is the most sensitive imaging modality to diagnose OMD as central loss of outer segment (OS)-RPE interdigitation zone and low reflectivity of EZ are detected in more than 85% of the OMD patients. Even in asymptomatic patients with RP1L1 mutations, one study showed parafoveal loss and foveal preservation of photoreceptors through SD-OCT. However, these changes can easily be missed by those not experienced at closely studying structural SD-OCTs. Moreover, it is difficult to estimate the area of affected photoreceptors on structural SD-OCT. The ellipsoid zone en face findings of these two patients corresponded to the loss EZ and low reflectivity in SD-OCT. Compared to the SD-OCT B-scans, ellipsoid en face images more distinctively illustrated photoreceptor loss in these two patients. The diagnosis can be confirmed by single gene sequencing of RP1L1. In addition, since ellipsoid zone en face is time-efficient and non-invasive, it can be a useful modality to monitor OMD longitudinally.

Conclusions

This is a report of ellipsoid zone en-face imaging in aiding diagnosis of OMD. This imaging modality can help raise clinical suspicion of OMD, which can be confirmed with genetic testing or mfERG. En-face imaging can also be valuable to monitor OMD progression.

Patient consent

The patient consented to the submission and publication of this case report with documentation on file.

Funding

No funding or grant support.

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors have financial disclosures related to this article.

Authorship

All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for Authorship.
  6 in total

1.  Multifocal electroretinography in patients with occult macular dystrophy.

Authors:  S Fujii; M F Escaño; K Ishibashi; H Matsuo; M Yamamoto
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Occult macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Yozo Miyake; Kazushige Tsunoda
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Multimodal imaging of occult macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Seong Joon Ahn; Jeeyun Ahn; Kyu Hyung Park; Se Joon Woo
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in a family with occult macular dystrophy (OMD).

Authors:  Hannes Wildberger; Günter Niemeyer; Armin Junghardt
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Dominant mutations in RP1L1 are responsible for occult macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Masakazu Akahori; Kazushige Tsunoda; Yozo Miyake; Yoko Fukuda; Hiroyuki Ishiura; Shoji Tsuji; Tomoaki Usui; Tetsuhisa Hatase; Makoto Nakamura; Hisao Ohde; Takeshi Itabashi; Haru Okamoto; Yuichiro Takada; Takeshi Iwata
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Parafoveal Photoreceptor Abnormalities in Asymptomatic Patients With RP1L1 Mutations in Families With Occult Macular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Yu Kato; Gen Hanazono; Kaoru Fujinami; Tetsuhisa Hatase; Yuichi Kawamura; Takeshi Iwata; Yozo Miyake; Kazushige Tsunoda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Multimodal imaging evaluation of occult macular dystrophy associated with a novel RP1L1 variant.

Authors:  Lorenzo Bianco; Alessandro Arrigo; Alessio Antropoli; Paola Carrera; Ivana Spiga; Maria Grazia Patricelli; Francesco Bandello; Maurizio Battaglia Parodi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.