| Literature DB >> 31193327 |
Abdel-Naser Zohri1, Mohamed Abdelwahab2, Maysa Ali1, Sara Ibrahim3, Mohamed Abdelazim3.
Abstract
The Scan Electron Microscope Images (SEM), X-ray Diffraction and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) dataset has been outlined investigating morphological features change of native sugarcane bagasse, as an agro-industrial lignocellulosic feedstock waste and a potential for cellulose biopolymer extraction, pretreated by alkali (sodium hydroxide) followed by an acid step (sodium bisulfate) in an exothermic in-situ one step, pretreated by acid (sulfuric acid) followed by residual solid fraction alkali pretreatment (sodium hydroxide) in a two separate individual steps and finally after the enzymatic cellulolysis. Data explained herein helps to extend and add to knowledge regarding the impact unlikeness of two different pretreatment methodologies utilize the same chemicals and relatively same concentrations on the cellulosic fiber morphological features and consequently its enzymatic accessibility. This data are related to Egypt Patent Office application, 1349/2017, entitled "In-situ sodium hydroxide-sodium bisulfate sugarcane bagasse pretreatment for biofuel production",Zohri et al., 2017 [1].Entities:
Keywords: Biofuel; Biomass; Cellulose; Enzymatic hydrolysis; In-situ; Pretreatment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31193327 PMCID: PMC6525299 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1SEM Micrographs of native sugarcane bagasse.
Fig. 2SEM Micrographs of In-situ process pretreated sugarcane bagasse.
Fig. 3SEM Micrographs of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by acid followed by alkali in a two separate steps.
Fig. 4SEM Micrographs of solid residual remained after enzymatic hydrolysis.
Fig. 5X-ray Diffractogram of native bagsse.
Fig. 6X-ray Diffractogram of In-situ pretreated sugarcane bagasse.
Fig. 7X-ray Diffractogram of acid/alkali pretreated sugarcane bagsse in a two separate steps.
Fig. 8FTIR Spectrogram of native bagasse.
Fig. 9FTIR Spectrogram of In-situ pretreated sugarcane bagasse.
Comparison between in-situ and the separate two individual processes.
| In-situ process | Two separate acid/alkali steps | |
|---|---|---|
| Methodology | One-pot | Individual two separate steps |
| Sodium hydroxide conc. | 1.3% | 2% |
| Sulfuric acid conc. | 1.45%, acid assay 98% | 1%, acid assay 98% |
| Water input | 1:12.5 solid to water ratio (overall process) | 1:17 solid to water ratio (overall process) |
| Heat demand | Exothermic, second in-situ step | Endothermic, both two steps |
| Cellulose loss | 5.8% | 33.4% |
| Fiber morphology | Disaggregated, loosen bundles | Aggregated, tight bundles |
| Cellulase enzyme load, Name | 0.12 ml, 12 FPU, Cellic Ctech2 per 1 g substrate. | 0.4 ml, 25 FPU, Accelerase 1500 and 50 FPU, Novozyme 188 per 1 g substrate, [3]. |
| Hydrolysis yield% | 75.4% | 72.3% |
| Hydrolysis time, h. | 48 h. | 72 h. |
Specifications table
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility | |
| Related research |
A convenient alkali-acid in-situ biomass pretreatment. A potential for cellulose-lignin valorization. Applicable to a variety of lignocellulosic feedstocks, rice straw and sweet sorghum. Easily commercialized in case of chemical recovery investigation. Essential for biorefinery concept. High glucose yield employing low cellulytic enzyme load. |