| Literature DB >> 31193257 |
Maciej Grzybek1, Aleksandra Cybulska2, Katarzyna Tołkacz3, Mohammed Alsarraf3, Jolanta Behnke-Borowczyk4, Klaudiusz Szczepaniak5, Aneta Strachecka6, Jerzy Paleolog7, Bożena Moskwa2, Jerzy M Behnke8, Anna Bajer3.
Abstract
Rodents play an important role as reservoir hosts of zoonotic diseases. As a component of our long-term programme of monitoring parasitic infections in bank vole populations in three ecologically similar sites in NE Poland, we screened blood samples for signs of a serological response to the presence of Trichinella spp. The overall seroprevalence of Trichinella spp. was 1.52%, but prevalence was largely concentrated in one of our three study sites and confined to the oldest individuals in the study. Seroprevalence of Trichinella spp. did not differ between the sexes. Although a local prevalence of 1.52% may seem low, when this is extrapolated to the national population of bank voles in peak years, perhaps numbering hundreds of millions of animals, the number of infected bank voles on a country wide scale is likely to be huge. Our results suggest that bank voles may be reservoirs of Trichinella spp. However, on the basis of our results we consider their importance as epidemiologically significant hosts for Trichinella spp. to be moderate and their role in this context to require further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Bank voles; Clethrionomys; Extrinsic factors; Intrinsic factors; Long-term approach; Myodes; Poland; Seroprevalence; Sylvatic cycle; Trichinella; Trichinellosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31193257 PMCID: PMC6524169 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.03.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Fig. 1Variation in Trichinella spp. seroprevalence between years (2002–2010) and sites of surveys.
Seroprevalence of Trichinella spp. between 2002 and 2010 by study site and by host age. N – number of animals tested. CL95 – confidence limits.
| Study site | Host age | Seropositive | Seroprevalence % (±CL95) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urwitalt | 1 | 55 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–4.1) |
| 2 | 111 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–2.1) | |
| 3 | 76 | 7 | 10.1 (4.9–19.2) | |
| By site | 242 | 7 | 2.9 (1.6–5.0) | |
| Talty | 1 | 72 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–5.4) |
| 2 | 69 | 1 | 1.5 (0.2–7.5) | |
| 3 | 87 | 1 | 1.2 (0.1–8.3) | |
| By site | 228 | 2 | 0.9 (0.3–2.3) | |
| Pilchy | 1 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–4.5) |
| 2 | 51 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–3.8) | |
| 3 | 75 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–5.6) | |
| By site | 186 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–3.5) | |