| Literature DB >> 31193221 |
Rihab Borji1, Firas Zghal1, Nidhal Zarrouk1, Vincent Martin2, Sonia Sahli1, Haithem Rebai1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore neuromuscular fatigue and recovery profiles in individuals with intellectual disability (ID) after exhausting submaximal contraction.Entities:
Keywords: Central fatigue; Intellectual disability; Neuromuscular fatigue; Peripheral fatigue; Sustained sub-maximal exercise; Twitch interpolation technique
Year: 2017 PMID: 31193221 PMCID: PMC6523034 DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.03.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Sport Health Sci ISSN: 2213-2961 Impact factor: 7.179
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the experimental protocol. To evaluate exercise-induced fatigue and recovery, 3 and then 12 repeated isometric maximal voluntary contractions (IMVC) superimposed and followed by peripheral nerve electrical stimulation (PNS) were performed before (pre-EX) and after fatiguing exercise (post-EX), respectively.
Baseline values of IMVC, VAL, Ptw, RMS/Mmax for VL, VM, and RF muscles and the time to task failure in both groups.
| Control | Intellectual disability | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| IMVC (N) | 780.94 ± 62.53 | 441.77 ± 132.89 | <0.001 |
| VAL (%) | 87.00 ± 10.46 | 65.78 ± 8.05 | <0.001 |
| Ptw (N) | 188.00 ± 20.28 | 121.68 ± 15.52 | <0.001 |
| RMS/Mmax VL (mV) | 0.07 ± 0.06 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0.28 |
| RMS/Mmax VM (mV) | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.10 |
| RMS/Mmax RF (mV) | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | <0.05 |
| Time to task failure (min) | 13.86 ± 8.34 | 37.97 ± 2.79 | <0.05 |
Abbreviations: IMVC = isometric maximal voluntary contraction; Ptw = potentiated twitch; RF = rectus femoris; RMS/Mmax = root mean square normalized to the maximal peak-to-peak amplitude of the M-wave; VAL = voluntary activation level; VL = vastus lateralis; VM = vastus medialis.
Fig. 2Evolution of the (A) IMVC (%max), (B) VAL (%max), and (C) Ptw (%max) before (pre-EX), immediately after the fatiguing isometric task (post-EX), and during the recovery period (post-EX 3–9, post-EX 12–21, post-EX 24–33) in individuals. *p < 0.05, compared with baseline; †p < 0.05, compared with ID group; ‡p < 0.05, compared with post-Ex; §p < 0.05, compared with post-EX 3–9. ID = intellectual disability; IMVC = isometric maximal voluntary contraction; post-Ex = post-exercise; post-Ex 3–9 = 3 sets performed in the recovery period 3 to 9 min after exercise; post-Ex 12–21 = 4 sets performed from 12 to 21 min after exercise; post-Ex 24–33 = 4 sets performed from 24 to 33 min after exercise; pre-Ex = pre-exercise; Ptw = potentiated twitch; VAL = voluntary activation level.
Evolution of the RMS/Mmax values of the VL, VM, and RF muscles in individuals with ID and control group at Pre-EX, Post-EX, and Post-EX 3–9, Post-EX 12–21, Post-EX 24–33 from the exhausting isometric task.
| ID (%max) | Control (%max) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-EX | Post-EX | Post-EX 3–9 | Post-EX 12–21 | Post-EX 24–33 | Pre-EX | Post-EX | Post-EX 3–9 | Post-EX 12–21 | Post-EX 24–33 | |
| RMS/Mmax VL | 96.03 ± 1.93 | 55.29 ± 24.36 | 69.30 ± 27.35 | 77.92 ± 22.86 | 80.55 ± 22.94 | 95.19 ± 1.94 | 91.80 ± 14.41 | 88.90 ± 18.16 | 93.36 ± 22.06 | 93.28 ± 23.49 |
| RMS/Mmax VM | 96.14 ± 3.21 | 68.08 ± 12.19 | 81.69 ± 14.70 | 83.36 ± 7.02 | 87.97 ± 17.04 | 97.27 ± 1.74 | 82.93 ± 9.95 | 95.57 ± 16.96 | 95.89 ± 16.96 | 101.91 ± 21.81 |
| RMS/Mmax RF | 95.02 ± 4.36 | 68.94 ± 13.87 | 77.80 ± 17.16 | 74.96 ± 12.77 | 76.29 ± 16.32 | 97.74 ± 6.55 | 82.71 ± 13.21 | 99.51 ± 12.19 | 97.63 ± 16.94 | 95.29 ± 16.25 |
Abbreviations: ID = intellectual disability; Post-Ex = post-exercise; Post-Ex 3–9 = 3 sets performed in the recovery period 3 to 9 min after exercise; Post-Ex 12–21 = 4 sets performed from 12 to 21 min after exercise; Post-Ex 24–33 = 4 sets performed from 24 to 33 min after exercise; Pre-Ex = pre-exercise; RF = rectus femoris; RMS/Mmax = root mean square normalized to the maximal peak-to-peak amplitude of the M-wave; VL = vastus lateralis; VM = vastus medialis.
p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, compared with pre-Ex.
p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001, compared with control group.