| Literature DB >> 31192701 |
Zhengpeng Zhu1, Lei Yan1, Shengdi Hu1, Sha An1, Zunzhou Lv1, Zhengguo Wang1, Yueming Wu1, Yutao Zhu1, Min Zhao1, Changsong Gu1, Aoran Zhang1.
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different sources and levels of trace elements on growth performance, carcass composition and mineral excretion levels of broilers. In a completely randomised experimental design, 900 one-day-old male Ross-308 broilers were assigned to 5 treatments, with 6 replicates of 30 birds each. The control group (CITE) was fed with a basal diet containing regular inclusion levels of inorganic trace elements. Treatment groups were supplied with reduced levels (30% and 50% of the regular level) of inorganic (ITE) or organic trace elements (OTE), respectively. Groups 50% ITE, 30% OTE and 50% OTE diets had equivalent average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), feed to gain ratio (F/G ratio) and mortality rate compared with group CITE in any phase. However, compared with group CITE chicks in group 30% ITE have lower ADG and ADFI and higher F/G ratio. The carcass yields were not affected by dietary treatments. Compared with group CITE, in groups 30% ITE, 50% ITE, 30% OTE and 50% OTE the shear force values of the breast muscle were only 71.8%, 83.4%, 63.5% and 59.4% (p < 0.05), respectively. Birds received diets containing reduced levels of trace elements had diminished excretions of Mn and Zn throughout the entire period (p < 0.01). In conclusion, the reduced supplementation of trace elements had no or slightly negative impact on growth performance, carcass yield and meat quality, but decreased faecal mineral excretion. Moreover, the trace element supply as OTE played a limited role on performance and excretion and was only partly beneficial for animal performance in case the trace element supply was reduced to 30%.Entities:
Keywords: Broilers; excretion; mineral excess; mineral supplements; organic salts; performance; pollution; trace elements
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31192701 DOI: 10.1080/1745039X.2019.1620050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Anim Nutr ISSN: 1477-2817 Impact factor: 2.242