Literature DB >> 31192367

The number needed to benefit: estimating the value of predictive analytics in healthcare.

Vincent X Liu1, David W Bates2, Jenna Wiens3, Nigam H Shah4.   

Abstract

Predictive analytics in health care has generated increasing enthusiasm recently, as reflected in a rapidly growing body of predictive models reported in literature and in real-time embedded models using electronic health record data. However, estimating the benefit of applying any single model to a specific clinical problem remains challenging today. Developing a shared framework for estimating model value is therefore critical to facilitate the effective, safe, and sustainable use of predictive tools into the future. We highlight key concepts within the prediction-action dyad that together are expected to impact model benefit. These include factors relevant to model prediction (including the number needed to screen) as well as those relevant to the subsequent action (number needed to treat). In the simplest terms, a number needed to benefit contextualizes the numbers needed to screen and treat, offering an opportunity to estimate the value of a clinical predictive model in action.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  EHR; cost-benefit analysis; implementation science; predictive analytics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31192367      PMCID: PMC6857505          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  45 in total

1.  Selection bias and treatment heterogeneity in clinical trials.

Authors:  N T Longford
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jim Nuovo; Joy Melnikow; Denise Chang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Assessment of claims of improved prediction beyond the Framingham risk score.

Authors:  Ioanna Tzoulaki; George Liberopoulos; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Learning from big health care data.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success.

Authors:  Kensaku Kawamoto; Caitlin A Houlihan; E Andrew Balas; David F Lobach
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-14

6.  Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine - Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations.

Authors:  Jonathan H Chen; Steven M Asch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia and the Use of Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Joshua W Knowles; Daniel J Rader; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Incorporating an Early Detection System Into Routine Clinical Practice in Two Community Hospitals.

Authors:  B Alex Dummett; Carmen Adams; Elizabeth Scruth; Vincent Liu; Margaret Guo; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.960

9.  Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients.

Authors:  David W Bates; Suchi Saria; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Anand Shah; Gabriel Escobar
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Design and implementation of a standardized framework to generate and evaluate patient-level prediction models using observational healthcare data.

Authors:  Jenna M Reps; Martijn J Schuemie; Marc A Suchard; Patrick B Ryan; Peter R Rijnbeek
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  15 in total

1.  Predicting preventable hospital readmissions with causal machine learning.

Authors:  Ben J Marafino; Alejandro Schuler; Vincent X Liu; Gabriel J Escobar; Mike Baiocchi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Evaluation of Incident 7-Day Infection and Sepsis Hospitalizations in an Integrated Health System.

Authors:  Vincent X Liu; Raj N Manickam; John D Greene; Alejandro Schuler; Patricia Kipnis; Meghana Bhimarao; Fernando Barreda; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-05

3.  Systematic Review of Approaches to Preserve Machine Learning Performance in the Presence of Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine.

Authors:  Lin Lawrence Guo; Stephen R Pfohl; Jason Fries; Jose Posada; Scott Lanyon Fleming; Catherine Aftandilian; Nigam Shah; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Rethinking PICO in the Machine Learning Era: ML-PICO.

Authors:  Xinran Liu; James Anstey; Ron Li; Chethan Sarabu; Reiri Sono; Atul J Butte
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  A framework for making predictive models useful in practice.

Authors:  Kenneth Jung; Sehj Kashyap; Anand Avati; Stephanie Harman; Heather Shaw; Ron Li; Margaret Smith; Kenny Shum; Jacob Javitz; Yohan Vetteth; Tina Seto; Steven C Bagley; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  A Simulated Prospective Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Clinical Deterioration Among Ward Patients.

Authors:  Parth K Shah; Jennifer C Ginestra; Lyle H Ungar; Paul Junker; Jeff I Rohrbach; Neil O Fishman; Gary E Weissman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 9.296

7.  Comparison of Early Warning Scoring Systems for Hospitalized Patients With and Without Infection at Risk for In-Hospital Mortality and Transfer to the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Vincent X Liu; Yun Lu; Kyle A Carey; Emily R Gilbert; Majid Afshar; Mary Akel; Nirav S Shah; John Dolan; Christopher Winslow; Patricia Kipnis; Dana P Edelson; Gabriel J Escobar; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 8.  Review of Clinical Research Informatics.

Authors:  Anthony Solomonides
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2020-08-21

Review 9.  Algorithmic prognostication in critical care: a promising but unproven technology for supporting difficult decisions.

Authors:  Gary E Weissman; Vincent X Liu
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.359

10.  Expected clinical utility of automatable prediction models for improving palliative and end-of-life care outcomes: Toward routine decision analysis before implementation.

Authors:  Ryeyan Taseen; Jean-François Ethier
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.