Literature DB >> 31192021

Determination of Progestin Residues in Fish by UPLC-Q-TOF/MS Coupled with QuEChERS.

Chunxiu Gu1,2, Yanling Cheng1,2, Xin Zhen1, Xiaoxuan Chen1, Kaowen Zhou1,2.   

Abstract

A novel method was developed for simultaneous determination of 10 progestin residues in fish by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF/MS) combined with a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method. The homogenized samples were dispersed by water, extracted with acetonitrile, and then purified by QuEChERS reagent. The concentrated analytes were detected by UPLC-Q-TOF/MS. High linearities (R 2 > 0.995) and recoveries (85.71-117.08%) at three spiked levels (5, 10, and 20 ng/g) and low relative standard deviation values (<8.83%, n = 7) and limits of detection (0.23-0.66 ng/g) were obtained. This method is simple, rapid, reliable, sensitive, and efficient and can be used for monitoring of progestin residues in fish. This method provides a strong guarantee to deal with food emergencies for the laboratory, provides technical support for the screening and quantitative detection of progesterone in fish, and provides technical support for the food safety of aquatic products.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31192021      PMCID: PMC6525950          DOI: 10.1155/2019/6426958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem        ISSN: 2090-8873            Impact factor:   2.193


1. Introduction

Hormone is a kind of substance produced by organisms to regulate metabolism or physiological functions of the body [1-3]. It is used to promote animal growth and improve the protein conversion rate in aquaculture to achieve the goal of greatly improving economic benefits of animal breeding. Studies have shown that progestin, a class of hormones, can enter animal tissues through feedstuffs and be ingested indirectly by the human body. Residual progestin can interfere with the balance of natural hormones in the human body, cause women to have similar reactions to early pregnancy, breast swelling, and irregular bleeding, affect liver function, cause neonatal malformations, and even cause cancer [4]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a fast and accurate method for detecting progesterone in food. Various methods were applied to determine progestin, including gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [5], high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) [6-9], fluorescent immunoassay [10, 11], and electrochemistry [12, 13]. Generally, derivatization steps are required in GC-MS analysis, which may be time consuming and lead to variety limitation, because most derivative processes are selective for limited groups of target analytes [14]. Compared with GC-MS, HPLC-MS/MS is supposed to show high sensitivity and specificity without additional derivatization and plays a vital role in determining a wide spectrum of compounds. Time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS) can provide structural information of unknown compounds because of its high resolution and high-quality number accuracy [15-21]. It is possible to screen and detect drugs in unknown samples by matching characteristic fragments with accurate mass number. In this work, an improved QuEChERS rapid pretreatment technique combined with UPLC-Q-TOF was used firstly to establish a method for simultaneous determination of 10 progestins in freshwater fish. The precise quality database of aquatic products can provide an efficient and convenient method for the determination of hormones in aquatic products and control the safety risk level of edible aquatic products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemical Substances and Apparatus

Methanol (≥99.9%) and acetonitrile (≥99.9%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). All reagents used were of analytical grade. Anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), sodium chloride (NaCl), primary secondary amine (PSA), and alumina-N were purchased from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). High-purity (least 98% purity) analytical standards were used. Norethisterone, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone, D-methylnorethindrone, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone acetate, megestrol, medroxyprogesterone, chlorprogestone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, melengestrol acetate, and progesterone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). Individual stock standard solutions (1000 mg/L) of each compound were prepared using methanol and stored in the refrigerator at −20°C. The mixed standard solution was prepared by mixing the 10 individual stock standard solutions (100 μL for each) and diluting with methanol to 10 mL in a volumetric flask, and the final concentration of each progestin was 10 mg/L. The mixed standard solutions prepared were stored at 4°C. Acquity ultra-performance liquid chromatography (Waters USA); Synapt G2-Si quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Waters USA); GR22GIII high-speed refrigerated centrifuge (HITACHI Japan); N-EVAPTM 112 nitrogen blowing apparatus (Organomation, USA); and KQ-500DE numerical control ultrasonic cleaner (Kunshan, China).

2.2. Sample Preparation

Fresh fish samples, i.e., grass carp, silver carp, bream, crucian carp, and catfish, were processed, homogenized, and stored at −20°C. Among these species, grass carp was used as the blank sample matrix for the method development and validation. The 10 progestins were not detected in the grass carp sample. Two grams of crushed homogeneous fish meat was accurately weighed and put in a 50 mL spiral cap centrifugal tube, 2 mL water was added and stirred for 1 minute on the vortex oscillator, 10 mL acetonitrile was added, stirred for 1 minute, and placed on the ultrasonic oscillator for 20 minutes, 2.0 g anhydrous magnesium sulfate and 1.0 g sodium chloride were added, and quickly mixed, stirred, and put it in the ice water bath. The mixture was centrifuged at 5000 r/min for 5 min. The supernatant was removed 8 mL and put into another 15 mL screw cap centrifugal tube. The centrifugal tube was loaded with QuEChERS purification powder (0.5 g anhydrous magnesium sulfate, 0.5 g neutral alumina, and 0.2 g PSA). Centrifugal tubes were swirled 1 min and centrifuged at 5000 r/min for 5 min. The supernatant was accurately removed, dried at 50°C on a nitrogen blower, and dissolved by 1.0 mL methanol-water (1 : 1). After passing through 0.22 μm microporous membrane, the filtrate was ready for use.

2.3. Analysis Conditions

The analytes were separated on a Waters Acquity BEH C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 μm). The mobile phase was 0.1% formic acid solution (A) and methanol (B). The optimized separation conditions were as follows: the column oven temperature was kept at 40°C and the sample injection volume was 10 μL. The elution gradient program was performed as follows: 0–2 min, 60% A; 2–6 min, 40% A; 6–6.5 min, 20% A, 6.5–7.1 min, 0% A; and 7.1–10 min, 60% A. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.3 mL/min. The quantitative analysis of the targeted compounds was performed with the full scan (MSe) mode. Nitrogen gas was used as the drying gas, and argon gas was used as collision gas. The ionization source conditions were used as follows: the flow rate and the temperature of the nitrogen gas was set at 800 L/h and 400°C, the cone voltage was 20 V, the capillary voltage was 2000 V, ion source temperature was 100°C, collision low energy was 6 V, and high energy gradient was 10–50 eV.

2.4. Method Validation

To validate the developed method, limits of detection (LODs), limits of quantification (LOQs), linearity, accuracy, and precision were investigated. The LOD and LOQ values were evaluated to be 3 and 10 times the standard deviation of 7 replicate runs for a fish sample spiked to a concentration level of 1.0 ng/g. Linearity was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2), which was obtained after constructing seven-point calibration curves. Accuracy was evaluated by the recovery of each target analyte at low, medium, and high concentrations (5, 10, and 20 ng/g) in fish samples. The precision was investigated by the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the analytical values obtained when the sample was repeatedly analyzed for 7 times (n = 7).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Optimization of Parameters in QuECHERS

The purification effect of C18 adsorbent and PSA was compared. The results showed that C18 adsorbent could adsorb the tested substance with low recovery. The adsorption efficiency of anhydrous magnesium sulfate and neutral alumina is not ideal when the mass of anhydrous magnesium sulfate and neutral alumina is relatively low. Therefore, the ratio of 0.5 g anhydrous magnesium sulfate, 0.5 g neutral alumina, and 0.2 g PSA is adopted. As an extracting solvent, acetonitrile can denaturate and precipitate the protein in the sample, thus removing the influence of the protein on the sample analysis. Anhydrous magnesium sulfate can remove moisture from the sample. Sodium chloride promotes the separation of residual water in the sample solution from acetonitrile and transfers all the target substances to the acetonitrile layer. Neutral alumina can remove the fat in the sample solution, and PSA can remove the carbohydrates and fatty acids in the sample matrix. After the above treatment, the clarified sample concentrate can be obtained, which is suitable for mass spectrometry analysis.

3.2. Optimization of Conditions for UPLC

This experiment compared the separation effects of three lengths 50 mm, 100 mm, and 150 mm of BEH C18. It is difficult to separate all the tested substances with a 50 mm column. A 150 mm column can completely separate the tested substances, but the separation time is longer than 10 minutes. A 100 mm column can separate the tested substances in 6 minutes, so a 100 mm column is selected.

3.3. Optimization of Conditions for TOF/MS

The low-energy channel acts as the first-order mass spectrometry, and the high-energy channel is used as the second-order mass spectrometry. The quasimolecular ion peaks of ten progestins were formed by the first-order mass spectrometry, and two daughter ions with high abundance were selected by the second-order mass spectrometry under the above conditions. The chromatographic retention time, quasimolecular ion peaks, and secondary ions of the compounds were used as identification characteristics. The optimized results are shown in Table 1. Figure 1 is the TOF mass spectra of 10 progesterone matrix standard solutions.
Table 1

TOF parameters of 10 progestins.

CompoundsFormulaExact massMother ions (m/z)Daughter ions (m/z)RT (min)
NorethisteroneC20H26O2298.1933299.1981231.1714, 281.18764.15
17α-hydroxyprogesteroneC21H30O3330.2195331.2245313.2140, 295.2004.64
D-methylnorethindroneC21H28O2312.2089313.2142245.1871, 295.20294.76
17α-hydroxyprogesterone acetateC23H32O4372.2301373.2391313.2151, 271.20954.87
MegestrolC22H30O3342.2195343.2242325.2208, 267.17885.00
MedroxyprogesteroneC22H32O3344.2351345.2393123.0765, 327.22945.28
Chlorprogestone acetateC23H29ClO4404.1754405.1806309.1852, 267.17045.43
Medroxyprogesterone acetateC24H34O4386.2454387.2521327.2306, 123.08205.50
Melengestrol acetateC25H32O4396.2301397.2343279.1719, 337.22005.59
ProgesteroneC21H30O2314.2246315.2287109.0609, 297.21795.64
Figure 1

TOF mass spectrogram of 10 progestin standard solutions.

3.4. Method Validation

Because of the complexity of the sample matrix, matrix effect exists in sample matrix, which can inhibit mass spectrometry signal. Standard solution can be diluted by matrix blank solution to eliminate matrix interference. Taking the concentration of hormone as abscissa and the peak area of hormone as ordinate, the standard curve was drawn, and the linear equation and correlation coefficient were obtained. The linear range of the standard curve is 10–500 ng/mL. As can be seen from Table 2, good linear determination coefficients (R2 > 0.995) of the calibration curves were obtained for all the analytes, and low LOD and LOQ values were achieved in range of 0.23–0.66 ng/g and 0.77–2.20 ng/g for selected analytes, respectively.
Table 2

Regression equations, correlation coefficients (R2), LOD, and LOQ of 10 progestins.

CompoundsLinear equations R 2 LOD (ng/g)LOQ (ng/g)
Norethisterone y = 184.1x + 21650.9950.230.77
17α-hydroxyprogesterone y = 135.3x + 439.80.99904031.77
D-methylnorethindrone y = 156.6x + 14250.9950.521.72
17α-hydroxyprogesterone acetate y = 152.3x + 17070.9970.341.12
Megestrol y = 185.8x + 418.20.9990.662.20
Medroxyprogesterone y = 158.9x + 439.70.9990.270.91
Chlorprogestone acetate y = 77.1x + 6980.9970.321.05
Medroxyprogesterone acetate y = 198.7x + 14680.9980.371.22
Melengestrol acetate y = 137.3x + 11130.9980.521.73
Progesterone y = 168.9x + 12660.9990.280.92
The blank grass carp meat was used as the substrate, and 5 ng/g, 10 ng/g, and 20 ng/g were added to the weighted substrate, respectively. Seven parallel tests were conducted at each level to determine the recovery and precision of the standard addition. The results are shown in Table 3. The recovery rate is 85.71–117.08%, and the relative standard deviation is 2.66–8.83%. At the same time, the quality control sample recovery rate and other indicators all reach the analysis requirements, indicating that the results are accurate and reliable.
Table 3

Recoveries and relative standard deviations (%) of 10 progestins in fish (n = 7).

Spiked level compounds5 ng/g10 ng/g20 ng/g
RecoveriesRSDsRecoveriesRSDsRecoveriesRSDs
Norethisterone88.555.4985.854.1287.975.25
17α-hydroxyprogesterone88.155.0285.716.81102.437.95
D-methylnorethindrone105.445.6888.404.3090.166.48
17α-hydroxyprogesterone acetate91.733.8395.714.01108.966.18
Megestrol88.667.6086.586.8887.796.60
Medroxyprogesterone104.844.69103.813.4089.776.30
Chlorprogestone acetate96.427.95109.652.6697.187.59
Medroxyprogesterone acetate87.978.3091.247.31107.596.33
Melengestrol acetate89.568.5999.977.2291.408.83
Progesterone106.368.2891.584.63117.087.76

4. Conclusions

The improved QuEChERS method was used for sample pretreatment and ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS) for the determination of 10 kinds of progesterone. The method was rapid and stable and could be used for the simultaneous determination of 10 kinds of progesterone in fish meat. This method provides a strong guarantee to deal with food emergencies for the laboratory, provides technical support for the screening and quantitative detection of progesterone in freshwater fish, and provides technical support for the food safety of aquatic products.
  15 in total

1.  Analytical methodology for the electro-catalytic determination of estradiol and progesterone based on graphene quantum dots and poly(sulfosalicylic acid) co-modified electrode.

Authors:  Majid Arvand; Shiva Hemmati
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.057

Review 2.  Evolution of thyroid hormone signaling in animals: Non-genomic and genomic modes of action.

Authors:  Elias Taylor; Andreas Heyland
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.102

3.  Determination of two progestin metabolites (17α-hydroxypregnanolone and pregnanediol) and different classes of steroids (androgens, estrogens, corticosteroids, progestins) in rivers and wastewaters by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS).

Authors:  Kun Zhang; Karl Fent
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Trace analysis of 61 natural and synthetic progestins in river water and sewage effluents by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Shen; Hong Chang; Dezhi Sun; Linxia Wang; Fengchang Wu
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Effect of Progesterone and Synthetic Progestins on Whole Blood Clot Formation and Erythrocyte Structure.

Authors:  Albe C Swanepoel; Odette Emmerson; Etheresia Pretorius
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.127

6.  Combining sorption experiments and Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) to study the adsorption of propranolol onto environmental solid matrices - Influence of copper(II).

Authors:  Rose-Michelle Smith; Stéphanie Sayen; Nicolas Nuns; Elise Berrier; Emmanuel Guillon
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Determination and surveillance of hydrocortisone and progesterone in livestock products by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Takayuki Nakajima; Yumi Tsuruoka; Maki Kanda; Hiroshi Hayashi; Tsuneo Hashimoto; Youko Matsushima; Souichi Yoshikawa; Chieko Nagano; Yuki Okutomi; Ichiro Takano
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2015-09-18

8.  Monitoring the contents of six steroidal and phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in chicken, fish and aquaculture pond water samples using pre-column derivatization and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with the aid of experimental design methodology.

Authors:  Hongliang Wu; Guoliang Li; Shucheng Liu; Na Hu; Dandan Geng; Guang Chen; Zhiwei Sun; Xianen Zhao; Lian Xia; Jinmao You
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 7.514

9.  Elevated stress hormone levels and antidepressant treatment starting before pregnancy affect maternal care and litter characteristics in an animal model of depression.

Authors:  J M Kott; S M Mooney-Leber; J Li; S Brummelte
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Establishing an Animal Model of Secondary Osteoporosis by Using a Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist.

Authors:  Nur-Vaizura Mohamad; Muhammad Afiq Amani Che Zulkepli; Krystine May Theseira; Norain Zulkifli; Nur Quraisha Shahrom; Nurul Amni Mohamad Ridzuan; Nor Aini Jamil; Ima-Nirwana Soelaiman; Kok-Yong Chin
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.