| Literature DB >> 31191992 |
Yijing Yang1,2,3, Ying Deng1, Ye Tian1, Zhen Yao1,3, Yasha Zhou1, Ying Wang4, Qinghua Peng1,2,3, Jun Peng3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the characteristics of blood in nonsyndromic retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and reveal the pathogenesis of blood cells involved in blood stasis in RP.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31191992 PMCID: PMC6525908 DOI: 10.1155/2019/1902915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Comparison of RBC indicators between the normal and RP group.
| Parameters | Normal group ( | RP group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RBC (mean (SD)), ×109·L−1 | 4.76 (0.52) | 4.38 (0.49) | <0.01a |
| HGB (mean (SD)), g/L | 145.28 (14.65) | 133.97 (14.94) | <0.01a |
| HCT (mean (SD)), % | 42.88 (4.04) | 39.51 (4.17) | <0.01a |
| MCV (mean (SD)), fL | 89.85 (3.45) | 90.67 (4.41) | >0.05a |
| MCH (mean (SD)), pg | 30.35 (1.56) | 30.72 (1.87) | >0.05a |
| MCHC (mean (SD)), g/L | 338.90 (9.64) | 337.84 (13.04) | >0.05a |
| RDW-cv (mean (SD)) | 12.58 (0.57) | 12.87 (0.66) | <0.01a |
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; p < 0.01 was considered statistically very significant; aT test was used to analyze the data.
Figure 1Comparison of RBC indicators between the normal and RP group. All data were in accordance with the normal distribution, and two independent samples t-tests were performed for comparison. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; p < 0.01 was considered statistically very significant.
Comparison of WBC indicators between the normal and RP group.
| Parameters (×109·L−1) | Normal group ( | RP group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (mean (SD))— | 6.17 (1.27) | 6.17 (1.61) | >0.05a |
| NEU (mean (SD))— | 3.65 (0.93) | 3.54 (1.14) | >0.05a |
| LYM (mean (SD))— | 1.97 (0.50) | 2.01 (0.92)# | >0.05b |
| MON (median (interquartile))— | 0.35 (0.19) | 0.36 (0.15) | >0.05b |
| EOS (median (interquartile))— | 0.12 (0.11) | 0.11 (0.10) | >0.05b |
| BAS (median (interquartile))— | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.02) | <0.01b |
#Data were expressed as median (interquartile); p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; p < 0.01 was considered statistically very significant; aT-test was used to analyze the samples; brank sum test was used to analyze the samples.
Figure 2Comparison of WBC indicators between the normal and RP group. Two independent samples T-tests were performed for comparing data of WBC and NEU counts. Two independent samples rank sum test was performed for other data. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. p < 0.01 was considered statistically very significant.
Comparison of PLT indicators between the normal and RP group.
| Parameters | Normal group ( | RP group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTs (mean (SD)), (×109·L−1) | 241.97 (53.98) | 202.75 (47.06) | <0.01a |
| MPV (median (interquartile)), fL | 11.00 (1.50) | 10.9 (1.50) | >0.05b |
| PCT (median (interquartile)), % | 0.26 (0.07) | 0.22 (0.06) | <0.01b |
| PDW (median (interquartile)), fL | 12.1 (2.65) | 13.20 (3.10) | <0.01b |
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; p < 0.01 was considered statistically very significant; aT test was used to analyze the data; brank sum test was used to analyze the samples.
Figure 3Comparison of PLT indicators between the normal and RP group. Two independent samples T-tests were performed for comparing the data of PLT. Two independent samples rank sum test was performed for the other data. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. p < 0.01 was considered statistically very significant.