Livia Popa1, Paul Taylor1. 1. The National Clinical FES Centre, Salisbury District Hospital, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This feasibility study investigated the effect of combined upper and lower limb functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHOD: Eleven people with PD and Hoehn and Yahr score 2-3 used FES to assist dorsiflexion and hand opening or fine hand movements for 2 weeks. Outcome measures were the nine-hole peg test, box and block test, 10 m walking test, Tinetti balance scale, modified Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire (PDQL), SPES/SCOPA scale, and compliance. All tests were carried out without FES. Comparisons were tested using the Student paired t-test. RESULTS: Two participants dropped out due to difficulty in using the equipment. Mean walking speed increased by 0.29 m s-1 (p = 0.002), step length by 0.09 m (p = 0.007), and cadence by 19.8 steps min-1 (p = 0.045). Tinetti balance score increased by 2.9 (p = 0.006). There was an increase in the box and block test of 5.1 (p = 0.025). The PD symptoms score of the PDQL improved by 4.9 (p = 0.013) and a reduction in SPES/SCOPA score of 5.7 (p = 0.005) indicated a reduced impact of PD. CONCLUSIONS: FES produced clinically meaningful improvements in gait and upper limb function. Some participants found using both interventions challenging and we would recommend that their introduction be staggered.
OBJECTIVES: This feasibility study investigated the effect of combined upper and lower limb functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHOD: Eleven people with PD and Hoehn and Yahr score 2-3 used FES to assist dorsiflexion and hand opening or fine hand movements for 2 weeks. Outcome measures were the nine-hole peg test, box and block test, 10 m walking test, Tinetti balance scale, modified Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire (PDQL), SPES/SCOPA scale, and compliance. All tests were carried out without FES. Comparisons were tested using the Student paired t-test. RESULTS: Two participants dropped out due to difficulty in using the equipment. Mean walking speed increased by 0.29 m s-1 (p = 0.002), step length by 0.09 m (p = 0.007), and cadence by 19.8 steps min-1 (p = 0.045). Tinetti balance score increased by 2.9 (p = 0.006). There was an increase in the box and block test of 5.1 (p = 0.025). The PD symptoms score of the PDQL improved by 4.9 (p = 0.013) and a reduction in SPES/SCOPA score of 5.7 (p = 0.005) indicated a reduced impact of PD. CONCLUSIONS: FES produced clinically meaningful improvements in gait and upper limb function. Some participants found using both interventions challenging and we would recommend that their introduction be staggered.
Authors: P N Taylor; J H Burridge; A L Dunkerley; D E Wood; J A Norton; C Singleton; I D Swain Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Beth E Fisher; Allan D Wu; George J Salem; Jooeun Song; Chien-Ho Janice Lin; Jeanine Yip; Steven Cen; James Gordon; Michael Jakowec; Giselle Petzinger Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2008-06-13 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Terry Ellis; Cees J de Goede; Robert G Feldman; Erik C Wolters; Gert Kwakkel; Robert C Wagenaar Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: J Marinus; M Visser; A M Stiggelbout; J Martin Rabey; P Martínez-Martín; U Bonuccelli; P H Kraus; J J van Hilten Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 10.154