| Literature DB >> 31191655 |
Kacharaju Kranthi Raja1,2, Padmini Hari2,3, Melissa Queen Kha Chin2, Kiran Singbal1,2, Ismail M Fareez2,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the color stability of a new organic rice husk nanocomposite as compared to four conventional composites after exposure to commonly consumed beverages in Malaysia.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31191655 PMCID: PMC6525882 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9753431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Composition of methacrylate-based composites investigated in the study.
| Composite | Resin | Filler | Manufacturer | Lot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G-aenial Universal Flo (GUF) | UDMA, Bis-MEPP, TEGDMA | Silicon dioxide (16 nm), strontium glass (200 nm), pigment | GC Dental Products Corporation, Japan | 1503000787 |
| Solare-X (SX) | UDMA, dimethacrylate | Silica nanoparticles, fluoroaluminosilicate glass fillers, prepolymerised fillers (lanthanoid fluoride nanoparticles, silica nanoparticles, and fluoroaluminosilicate glass fillers) | GC Dental Products Corporation, Japan | 1403272 |
| Ceram.X One Universal (CXO) | Methacrylate-modified polysiloxane, dimethacrylate resin | Barium-aluminium-borosilicate glass (1–1.5 | Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Germany | 1503000787 |
| Neofil (NFL) | Bis-GMA | Barium borosilicate glass, silica-zirconia nanoparticle (0.01 microns) | Kerr Corporation, USA | 5296721 |
| Rice husk composite (RHC) | Bis-GMA, TEGDMA | Nanosilica obtained from rice husk, silanized with 6 wt.% | USM, Malaysia | — |
UDMA: diurethane dimethacrylate; Bis-MEPP: bisphenol-A ethoxylate dimethacrylate; TEGDMA: triethylene glycol dimethacrylate; Bis-GMA: bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate; y-MPS: 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate.
Figure 1The disc samples used to evaluate the color stability of rice husk-based composite and four other commercially available methacrylate-based composites (n=5).
Composition of staining solutions investigated in the study.
| Staining solution | Ingredients | Manufacturer | Concentration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coco-based drink (CHO) | Extract of malted barley, maltodextrin, cow milk, sugar, cocoa, palm oil, minerals, vitamin | Milo, Nestlé, Malaysia | 33 g of Milo/200 ml boiling distilled water |
| Coffee (COF) | Sugar, glucose, syrup, hydrogenated palm kernel oil, instant coffee, skimmed milk powder 4% (cow milk), sodium caseinate (milk protein), salt | Nescafé Blend & Brew™, Nestlé, Malaysia | 20 g of Nescafe/180 ml boiling distilled water |
| Chinese tea (CHI) | Pu-erh tea leaves | Pu-erh tea (M) SDN BHD, Malaysia | 2 g of pu-erh tea/40 ml boiling distilled water |
| Milk tea (MT) | Nondairy creamer, sugar, instant tea, stevia leave extract | Teh tarik original, BOH, Malaysia | 27 g of teh tarik/180 ml boiling distilled water |
| Distilled water | — | Hamilton Laboratory Glass Ltd, UK | As supplied |
Figure 2Color changes of composites across four weeks of the immersion period. G-aenial Universal Flo, GUF; Solare-X, SX; Ceram.X One Universal, CXO; Neofil, NFL; rice husk composite, RHC.
Color changes of composites at the end of four weeks.
| Composite | CHO | COF | CHI | MT | Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUF (A) | 1.45 (0.76)a,b | 4.44 (0.61)a | 4.85 (0.34)a | 1.66 (0.17)a | 0.55 (0.33)a |
| SX (C) | 2.83 (1.88)b | 7.70 (1.16)b | 22.89 (0.91)c | 15.73 (3.58)c | 1.06 (0.53)a |
| CXO (A) | 0.80 (0.44)a | 4.65 (0.73)a | 3.29 (1.12)a | 1.21 (0.19)a | 0.56 (0.48)a |
| NFL (C) | 3.78 (0.34)c | 14.38 (0.72)c | 20.43 (1.61)c | 4.80 (0.47)b | 0.50 (0.14)a |
| CX (B) | 3.46 (1.08)c | 12.96 (2.04)c | 13.11 (3.19)b | 2.91 (0.40)a,b | 0.90 (1.26)a |
a–cMean values followed by different superscript letters and composites followed by different uppercase letters in the same column are statistically different according to Tukey's post hoc test (p ≥ 0.05).