| Literature DB >> 31191423 |
Yang Yu1, Hong Sun2, Fengqiang Gao1.
Abstract
Recent studies found that some personality traits (e.g., impulsivity, sensation seeking) are frequently related to Internet addiction. In line with previous studies, this study aimed to determine whether shy students readily develop Internet addiction and to identify the causes of their developing Internet addiction. Specifically, this study examined the mediating roles of cognitive flexibility, self-regulation, and self-inconsistency in linking shyness and Internet addiction. A total of 1301 middle-school students in Shandong Province, East China, completed the relevant scales. Correlation analysis revealed that shyness was positively correlated with self-inconsistency and Internet addiction and negatively correlated with self-regulation and self-inconsistency. Cognitive flexibility, self-regulation, and self-inconsistency played fully mediating roles in the relationship between shyness and Internet addiction. The results indicate the significance of shyness-sensitivity for Internet addiction and suggest that cognitive and coping abilities as well as social adjustment factors should be considered when designing interventions to help shy students overcome Internet addiction.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive flexibility; internet addiction; self-inconsistency; self-regulation; shyness
Year: 2019 PMID: 31191423 PMCID: PMC6549447 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Multiple mediation model for relations among shyness, cognitive flexibility, self-regulation, self-inconsistency, and Internet addiction. path values are the standardized regression coefficients (standard errors), N = 1301, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01.
Demographic variables and frequency distribution.
| Missing value | Sum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Boys | Girls | |||
| 646(49.7%) | 653(50.2%) | 2(0.2%) | |||
| Grade | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | ||
| 654(50.3%) | 450(34.6%) | 197(15.1%) | 0 | ||
| School location | City | Village | |||
| 539(41.4%) | 762(58.6%) | 0 | |||
| Only child | Yes | No | |||
| 538(41.4%) | 736(56.6%) | 27(2.1%) | 1301 | ||
Means (M), standard deviations (SD), and correlations between variables (N = 1301).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Shyness | 34.48 | 8.29 | 1 | |||
| (2) Cognitive flexibility | 42.21 | 7.88 | –0.42** | 1 | ||
| (3) Self-regulation | 95.68 | 13.85 | –0.25** | 0.58** | 1 | |
| (4) Self-inconsistency | 16.73 | 4.62 | 0.36** | –0.29** | –0.28** | 1 |
| (5) Internet addiction | 38.28 | 13.66 | 0.19** | –0.28** | –0.51** | 0.31** |
Bootstrap analysis results for mediating effects.
| Indirect impact path | Average indirect effect | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| lower | upper | ||
| (1) shyness→cognitive flexibility→Internet addiction | –0.03 | –0.06 | –0.005 |
| (2) shyness→cognitive flexibility→self-regulation →Internet addiction | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
| (3) shyness→cognitive flexibility→self-inconsistency →Internet addiction | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
| (4) shyness→cognitive flexibility→self-regulation→self-inconsistency →Internet addiction | 0.01 | 0.004 | 0.01 |
| (5) shyness→self-regulation→Internet addiction | 0.004 | –0.02 | 0.03 |
| (6) shyness→self-regulation→self-inconsistency→Internet addiction | 0.0002 | –0.001 | 0.002 |
| (7) shyness→self-inconsistency→Internet addiction | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.07 |