| Literature DB >> 31189601 |
Da Yin1, Eric S Haag2.
Abstract
The maintenance of males at intermediate frequencies is an important evolutionary problem. Several species of Caenorhabditis nematodes have evolved a mating system in which selfing hermaphrodites and males coexist. While selfing produces XX hermaphrodites, cross-fertilization produces 50% XO male progeny. Thus, male mating success dictates the sex ratio. Here, we focus on the contribution of the male secreted short (mss) gene family to male mating success, sex ratio, and population growth. The mss family is essential for sperm competitiveness in gonochoristic species, but has been lost in parallel in androdioecious species. Using a transgene to restore mss function to the androdioecious Caenorhabditis briggsae, we examined how mating system and population subdivision influence the fitness of the mss + genotype. Consistent with theoretical expectations, when mss+ and mss -null (i.e., wild type) genotypes compete, mss+ is positively selected in both mixed-mating and strictly outcrossing situations, though more strongly in the latter. Thus, while sexual mode alone affects the fitness of mss+, it is insufficient to explain its parallel loss. However, in genetically homogenous androdioecious populations, mss+ both increases male frequency and depresses population growth. We propose that the lack of inbreeding depression and the strong subdivision that characterize natural Caenorhabditis populations impose selection on sex ratio that makes loss of mss adaptive after self-fertility evolves.Entities:
Keywords: androdioecy; nematodes; sex ratio; sperm
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31189601 PMCID: PMC6601293 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1903925116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Relative fitness of mss+ and mss− genotypes in androdioecious and gonochoristic populations. (A) Modeling the competition between mss+ and mss− genotypes in a panmictic population, founded with equal proportions of selfing hermaphrodites and males, half of which are homozygous for each genotype. Over time the mss+ allele frequency (Upper colored dots) increases, but slows as males are eliminated (because α < 2). The expected sum of mss and mss diploid genotype frequencies is also shown (GFP+, thin solid lines) for comparison with experimental data. (B) Modeling the competition between mss+ and mss− genotypes in a panmictic, obligately outcrossing (i.e., male/female) population. The sperm competitiveness factor (C) for mss+ is set at 1, while that for mss− males can vary from 0 (sterility) to 1 (equal to mss+). (C) Experimental evolution scheme for assessing mss+ fitness in androdioecios and gonochoristic population. (D) In a mixed population of C. briggsae WT AF16 (mss−, GFP−) and CP161 (mss+, GFP+), where selfing and outcrossing coexist, GFP+ (sum of mss and mss diploid genotype) frequency increases from 50 to a median of 63.5% over 25 generations. The estimated mean and median mss frequency at the 25th generation, 0.59 and 0.57, are significantly higher than 0.50 (P = 0.0287; one-tailed sign test, n = 14). (E) Competition in a mixed population of C. briggsae she-1(v49); mss−, GFP− and CP164 (she-1(v49); mss+, GFP+), where all XX animals lack self-sperm. Median GFP+ frequency increased to 0.72 at the third generation, and was 0.87 at the 25th generation. The GFP+ frequency distribution at generation 25 is significantly higher than 0.75 (P = 0.0002594; one-tailed sign test, n = 16). Similarly, the mean mss+ allele frequency at the 25th generation is 0.67, significantly higher than the initial 0.50. (P = 7.629e-06; one-tailed sign test, n = 16).
Fig. 2.mss+ C. briggsae produce more males. (A) Modeling the impact of varying fertilization success (α) on sex ratio over time in a genetically homogenous population. Males and hermaphrodites are both at 50% frequency in the first generation. At any value of α < 2 male frequency declines and hermaphrodite frequency increases. (B) Expected impact of α on population growth. At generation one, the population is founded with one mated hermaphrodite. At generation two, population size is determined solely by the fecundity of this hermaphrodite (here we assume each produces 100 eggs). The advantage of low male fertilization success is seen in the substantially larger number of grand-offspring in generation three. (C–E) Experimental examination of male frequency. (C) Schematic of experimental design. Replicated populations of the indicated genotype were started with mated hermaphrodites and subsequently scored for male frequency in the first (F1) or second (F2) generation. (D) In F1 populations (progeny of a single mated hermaphrodite), CP161(mss+) (n = 20) and CP162 (mss+) (n = 22) both have a significantly higher ratio of males compared with AF16 (wild type) (n = 16). The median percentage is 0.448, 0.516, and 0.521 for each strain. (E) In the F2 generation, CP161 (mss+) (n = 12) and CP162 (mss+) (n = 10) again both showed a significantly higher ratio of males compared with AF16 wild type (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). Individual data points represent the frequency of males in each replicate population.
Fig. 3.mss+ populations grow slower. (A) The F1 progeny produced by a single mated hermaphrodite of strains AF16 (n = 16), CP161 (n = 20), and CP162 (n = 21) are not significantly (n.s.) different. (B) The mss+ strains CP161 (n = 12) and CP162 (n = 12) both produced significantly smaller numbers of F2 progeny than the mss− AF16 (n = 16). P value indicated for each comparison is by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. (C) Examples of population size determination by automated worm sorter. Eight replicates with the number of worms closest to the medium value were used to make the scatterplots of extinction (EXT) vs. time-of-flight (TOF) data for individual worms. Data points in gray represent small, translucent embryos, larvae, which are F3 progeny. Data points in red represent animals developed enough to be F2 (or older) after 5 d of growth.