Literature DB >> 31189203

Building Usability Knowledge for Health Information Technology: A Usability-Oriented Analysis of Incident Reports.

Romaric Marcilly1, Jessica Schiro1, Marie Catherine Beuscart-Zéphir1, Farah Magrabi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The contribution of usability flaws to patient safety issues is acknowledged but not well-investigated. Free-text descriptions of incident reports may provide useful data to identify the connection between health information technology (HIT) usability flaws and patient safety.
OBJECTIVES: This article examines the feasibility of using incident reports about HIT to learn about the usability flaws that affect patient safety. We posed three questions: (1) To what extent can we gain knowledge about usability issues from incident reports? (2) What types of usability flaws, related usage problems, and negative outcomes are reported in incidents reports? (3) What are the reported usability issues that give rise to patient safety issues?
METHODS: A sample of 359 reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was examined. Descriptions of usability flaws, usage problems, and negative outcomes were extracted and categorized. A supplementary analysis was performed on the incidents which contained the full chain going from a usability flaw up to a patient safety issue to identify the usability issues that gave rise to patient safety incidents.
RESULTS: A total of 249 reports were included. We found that incident reports can provide knowledge about usability flaws, usage problems, and negative outcomes. Thirty-six incidents report how usability flaws affected patient safety (ranging from incidents without consequence, to death) involving electronic patient scales, imaging systems, and HIT for medication management. The most significant class of involved usability flaws is related to the reliability, the understandability, and the availability of the clinical information.
CONCLUSION: Incidents reports involving HIT are an exploitable source of information to learn about usability flaws and their effects on patient safety. Results can be used to convince all stakeholders involved in the HIT system lifecycle that usability should be considered seriously to prevent patient safety incidents. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31189203      PMCID: PMC6561760          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1691841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  32 in total

1.  Beyond blame: cultural barriers to medical incident reporting.

Authors:  Justin J Waring
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Combining usability evaluations to highlight the chain that leads from usability flaws to usage problems and then negative outcomes.

Authors:  Ludivine Watbled; Romaric Marcilly; Sandra Guerlinger; J-M Christian Bastien; Marie-Catherine Beuscart-Zéphir; Régis Beuscart
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mi Ok Kim; Enrico Coiera; Farah Magrabi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.

Authors:  Raj Ratwani; Terry Fairbanks; Erica Savage; Katie Adams; Michael Wittie; Edna Boone; Andrew Hayden; Janey Barnes; Zach Hettinger; Andrew Gettinger
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Technology-related medication errors in a tertiary hospital: a 5-year analysis of reported medication incidents.

Authors:  N R Samaranayake; S T D Cheung; W C M Chui; B M Y Cheung
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Safer healthcare at home: Detecting, correcting and learning from incidents involving infusion devices.

Authors:  Imogen Lyons; Ann Blandford
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems.

Authors:  Farah Magrabi; Mei-Sing Ong; William Runciman; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Empirical studies on usability of mHealth apps: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Belén Cruz Zapata; José Luis Fernández-Alemán; Ali Idri; Ambrosio Toval
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Health IT success and failure: recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop.

Authors:  Bonnie Kaplan; Kimberly D Harris-Salamone
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Patient safety events reported in general practice: a taxonomy.

Authors:  M A B Makeham; S Stromer; C Bridges-Webb; M Mira; D C Saltman; C Cooper; M R Kidd
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  The Effect of Electronic Health Record Usability Redesign on Annual Screening Rates in an Ambulatory Setting.

Authors:  Robert P Pierce; Bernie R Eskridge; LeAnn Rehard; Brandi Ross; Margaret A Day; Jeffery L Belden
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation.

Authors:  Irina Sinabell; Elske Ammenwerth
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.762

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.